Motion - Colonoscopic Surveillance is more Cost Effective than Colectomy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Arguments Against the Motion
There are insufficient data upon which to base recommendations about surveillance colonoscopy and prophylactic colectomy for the prevention of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis. Case series, analyses of intermediate results and extrapolations from other patient groups do not cons...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Anders Ekbom |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2003-01-01
|
Series: | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/149259 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Motion – Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Is More Cost-Effective than Oral PPI Administration: Arguments against the Motion
by: Amnon Sonnenberg
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Motion – Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Is More Cost Effective Than Oral PPI Administration: Arguments for the Motion
by: Lee L Swanström
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Motion – The Available Treatments for Hepatitis C Are Cost Effective: Arguments against the Motion
by: W Ray Kim
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Severe and Extensive Enteritis following Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
by: Greg Rosenfeld, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Motion – Helicobacter pylori Causes or Worsens GERD: Arguments against the Motion
by: Kenneth EL McColl
Published: (2002-01-01)