Exploring Age and Gender Differences in ICT Cybersecurity Behaviour

Known age differences exist in relation to information and communication technology (ICT) use, attitudes, access, and literacy. Less is known about age differences in relation to cybersecurity risks and associated cybersecurity behaviours. Using an online survey, this study analyses data from 579 pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dawn Branley-Bell, Lynne Coventry, Matt Dixon, Adam Joinson, Pam Briggs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2693080
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549056107249664
author Dawn Branley-Bell
Lynne Coventry
Matt Dixon
Adam Joinson
Pam Briggs
author_facet Dawn Branley-Bell
Lynne Coventry
Matt Dixon
Adam Joinson
Pam Briggs
author_sort Dawn Branley-Bell
collection DOAJ
description Known age differences exist in relation to information and communication technology (ICT) use, attitudes, access, and literacy. Less is known about age differences in relation to cybersecurity risks and associated cybersecurity behaviours. Using an online survey, this study analyses data from 579 participants to investigate age differences across four key cybersecurity behaviours: device securement, password generation, proactive checking, and software updating. Significant age differences were found; however, this is not a straightforward relationship. Older users appear less likely to secure their devices compared to younger users; however, the reverse was found for the other behaviours, with older users appearing more likely to generate secure passwords and show proactive risk awareness and regularly install updates. Gender was not a significant predictor of security behaviour (although males scored higher for self-reported computer self-efficacy and general resilience). Self-efficacy was identified as a mediator between age and three of the cybersecurity behaviours (password generation, proactive checking, and updating). General resilience was also a significant mediator for device securement, password generation, and updating; however, resilience acted as a moderator for proactive checking. Implications of these findings are twofold: firstly, helping to guide the development of training and interventions tailored to different cybersecurity behaviours and secondly informing cybersecurity policy development.
format Article
id doaj-art-b1cafd6de1754d30b0cf68c9daa933c0
institution Kabale University
issn 2578-1863
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
spelling doaj-art-b1cafd6de1754d30b0cf68c9daa933c02025-02-03T06:12:25ZengWileyHuman Behavior and Emerging Technologies2578-18632022-01-01202210.1155/2022/2693080Exploring Age and Gender Differences in ICT Cybersecurity BehaviourDawn Branley-Bell0Lynne Coventry1Matt Dixon2Adam Joinson3Pam Briggs4Department of PsychologyDepartment of PsychologyDepartment of PsychologySchool of ManagementDepartment of PsychologyKnown age differences exist in relation to information and communication technology (ICT) use, attitudes, access, and literacy. Less is known about age differences in relation to cybersecurity risks and associated cybersecurity behaviours. Using an online survey, this study analyses data from 579 participants to investigate age differences across four key cybersecurity behaviours: device securement, password generation, proactive checking, and software updating. Significant age differences were found; however, this is not a straightforward relationship. Older users appear less likely to secure their devices compared to younger users; however, the reverse was found for the other behaviours, with older users appearing more likely to generate secure passwords and show proactive risk awareness and regularly install updates. Gender was not a significant predictor of security behaviour (although males scored higher for self-reported computer self-efficacy and general resilience). Self-efficacy was identified as a mediator between age and three of the cybersecurity behaviours (password generation, proactive checking, and updating). General resilience was also a significant mediator for device securement, password generation, and updating; however, resilience acted as a moderator for proactive checking. Implications of these findings are twofold: firstly, helping to guide the development of training and interventions tailored to different cybersecurity behaviours and secondly informing cybersecurity policy development.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2693080
spellingShingle Dawn Branley-Bell
Lynne Coventry
Matt Dixon
Adam Joinson
Pam Briggs
Exploring Age and Gender Differences in ICT Cybersecurity Behaviour
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
title Exploring Age and Gender Differences in ICT Cybersecurity Behaviour
title_full Exploring Age and Gender Differences in ICT Cybersecurity Behaviour
title_fullStr Exploring Age and Gender Differences in ICT Cybersecurity Behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Age and Gender Differences in ICT Cybersecurity Behaviour
title_short Exploring Age and Gender Differences in ICT Cybersecurity Behaviour
title_sort exploring age and gender differences in ict cybersecurity behaviour
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2693080
work_keys_str_mv AT dawnbranleybell exploringageandgenderdifferencesinictcybersecuritybehaviour
AT lynnecoventry exploringageandgenderdifferencesinictcybersecuritybehaviour
AT mattdixon exploringageandgenderdifferencesinictcybersecuritybehaviour
AT adamjoinson exploringageandgenderdifferencesinictcybersecuritybehaviour
AT pambriggs exploringageandgenderdifferencesinictcybersecuritybehaviour