A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes.
<h4>Introduction</h4>User designed Automated Insulin Delivery systems (AID), termed Do-It-Yourself (DIY) AID include; AndroidAPS, OpenAPS and Loop. These unregulated systems provide challenges for healthcare providers worldwide, with potential legal and ethical barriers to supporting the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271096&type=printable |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832540065340850176 |
---|---|
author | Amy E Morrison Kimberley Chong Peter A Senior Anna Lam |
author_facet | Amy E Morrison Kimberley Chong Peter A Senior Anna Lam |
author_sort | Amy E Morrison |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Introduction</h4>User designed Automated Insulin Delivery systems (AID), termed Do-It-Yourself (DIY) AID include; AndroidAPS, OpenAPS and Loop. These unregulated systems provide challenges for healthcare providers worldwide, with potential legal and ethical barriers to supporting their use. We performed a scoping review of the currently available literature surrounding DIY AID systems, specifically to highlight the evidence available to facilitate healthcare providers to support persons with diabetes who may benefit from DIY AID.<h4>Methods</h4>Studies relating to DIY AID systems were searched in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Proquest and Cochrane library until 31st December 2021. Publications were screened through title and abstract to identify study type and AID system type described. A thematic synthesis methodology was used for analysis of studies of DIY AID use due to the heterogeneity in study designs (case reports, qualitative, cross-sectional and cohort studies), with similarity in outcome themes.<h4>Results</h4>Following implementation of the search strategy, 38 relevant full texts were identified; comprising 12 case reports, 9 qualitative studies and 17 cohort studies, and data was also available from 24 relevant conference abstracts. No randomized studies were identified. Common themes were identified in the outcomes across the studies; glycemic variability, safety, quality of life, healthcare provider attitudes and social media.<h4>Conclusion</h4>There is extensive real-world data, but a lack of randomized control trial evidence supporting DIY AID system use, due to the user-driven, unregulated nature of these systems. Healthcare providers report a lack of understanding surrounding, and confidence in supporting, DIY AID despite impressive observational and user self-reported improvements in glycemic variability, without any reported safety compromises. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-b1b26ce7973d4d7393049e0056a32a00 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj-art-b1b26ce7973d4d7393049e0056a32a002025-02-05T05:32:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01178e027109610.1371/journal.pone.0271096A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes.Amy E MorrisonKimberley ChongPeter A SeniorAnna Lam<h4>Introduction</h4>User designed Automated Insulin Delivery systems (AID), termed Do-It-Yourself (DIY) AID include; AndroidAPS, OpenAPS and Loop. These unregulated systems provide challenges for healthcare providers worldwide, with potential legal and ethical barriers to supporting their use. We performed a scoping review of the currently available literature surrounding DIY AID systems, specifically to highlight the evidence available to facilitate healthcare providers to support persons with diabetes who may benefit from DIY AID.<h4>Methods</h4>Studies relating to DIY AID systems were searched in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Proquest and Cochrane library until 31st December 2021. Publications were screened through title and abstract to identify study type and AID system type described. A thematic synthesis methodology was used for analysis of studies of DIY AID use due to the heterogeneity in study designs (case reports, qualitative, cross-sectional and cohort studies), with similarity in outcome themes.<h4>Results</h4>Following implementation of the search strategy, 38 relevant full texts were identified; comprising 12 case reports, 9 qualitative studies and 17 cohort studies, and data was also available from 24 relevant conference abstracts. No randomized studies were identified. Common themes were identified in the outcomes across the studies; glycemic variability, safety, quality of life, healthcare provider attitudes and social media.<h4>Conclusion</h4>There is extensive real-world data, but a lack of randomized control trial evidence supporting DIY AID system use, due to the user-driven, unregulated nature of these systems. Healthcare providers report a lack of understanding surrounding, and confidence in supporting, DIY AID despite impressive observational and user self-reported improvements in glycemic variability, without any reported safety compromises.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271096&type=printable |
spellingShingle | Amy E Morrison Kimberley Chong Peter A Senior Anna Lam A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE |
title | A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes. |
title_full | A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes. |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes. |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes. |
title_short | A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes. |
title_sort | scoping review of do it yourself automated insulin delivery system diy aid use in people with type 1 diabetes |
url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271096&type=printable |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amyemorrison ascopingreviewofdoityourselfautomatedinsulindeliverysystemdiyaiduseinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT kimberleychong ascopingreviewofdoityourselfautomatedinsulindeliverysystemdiyaiduseinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT peterasenior ascopingreviewofdoityourselfautomatedinsulindeliverysystemdiyaiduseinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT annalam ascopingreviewofdoityourselfautomatedinsulindeliverysystemdiyaiduseinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT amyemorrison scopingreviewofdoityourselfautomatedinsulindeliverysystemdiyaiduseinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT kimberleychong scopingreviewofdoityourselfautomatedinsulindeliverysystemdiyaiduseinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT peterasenior scopingreviewofdoityourselfautomatedinsulindeliverysystemdiyaiduseinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT annalam scopingreviewofdoityourselfautomatedinsulindeliverysystemdiyaiduseinpeoplewithtype1diabetes |