Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan

Abstract Background This study investigates the relationships between resilience dimensions, coping strategies, and prior disaster experience, focusing on disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors in Taiwan. Methods A total of 550 participants were surveyed, with 57.82% being female and the majo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Ling Wu, Tsai-Wen Lin, Jason Lam, Samuel S. C. Wang, Herman H. M. Lo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21361-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594358579232768
author Yi-Ling Wu
Tsai-Wen Lin
Jason Lam
Samuel S. C. Wang
Herman H. M. Lo
author_facet Yi-Ling Wu
Tsai-Wen Lin
Jason Lam
Samuel S. C. Wang
Herman H. M. Lo
author_sort Yi-Ling Wu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study investigates the relationships between resilience dimensions, coping strategies, and prior disaster experience, focusing on disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors in Taiwan. Methods A total of 550 participants were surveyed, with 57.82% being female and the majority aged between 21 and 40 years. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis, we examined six resilience dimensions, which include problem-solving, social support, negative emotion regulation, stable interpersonal relationships, assertiveness, and self-regulation, as predictors of disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors. Results The models accounted for 41.83–44.83% of the variance in preparedness and 5.43–10.74% of the variance in denial/avoidance. Across all models, problem-solving, assertiveness, and living with family consistently predicted higher preparedness, while income consistently predicted lower denial and avoidance behaviors. Notably, flood experience significantly moderated the relationship between social support and denial/avoidance (β = 0.21, p = .017), indicating that participants with stronger social support who had experienced floods were more likely to engage in denial and avoidance behaviors. Additionally, flood experience negatively moderated the relationship between negative emotion regulation and both preparedness (β = − 0.18, p = .035) and denial/avoidance (β = − 0.23, p = .030), suggesting that individuals with higher emotional regulation were less likely to prepare or deny disaster risks after flood exposure. Conclusion These findings highlight the importance of addressing individual resilience capacities and the complexities of prior disaster experiences in disaster preparedness interventions, with particular attention to vulnerable populations.
format Article
id doaj-art-b18bccbdc87f4474af12e18faaa233c2
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-b18bccbdc87f4474af12e18faaa233c22025-01-19T12:42:09ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-01-0125111510.1186/s12889-025-21361-yResilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in TaiwanYi-Ling Wu0Tsai-Wen Lin1Jason Lam2Samuel S. C. Wang3Herman H. M. Lo4Master’s Program of Transition and Leisure Education for Individuals with Disabilities, University of TaipeiNational Academy for Education ResearchUniversity of SouthamptonDepartment of Health and Welfare, University of TaipeiDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityAbstract Background This study investigates the relationships between resilience dimensions, coping strategies, and prior disaster experience, focusing on disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors in Taiwan. Methods A total of 550 participants were surveyed, with 57.82% being female and the majority aged between 21 and 40 years. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis, we examined six resilience dimensions, which include problem-solving, social support, negative emotion regulation, stable interpersonal relationships, assertiveness, and self-regulation, as predictors of disaster preparedness and avoidance behaviors. Results The models accounted for 41.83–44.83% of the variance in preparedness and 5.43–10.74% of the variance in denial/avoidance. Across all models, problem-solving, assertiveness, and living with family consistently predicted higher preparedness, while income consistently predicted lower denial and avoidance behaviors. Notably, flood experience significantly moderated the relationship between social support and denial/avoidance (β = 0.21, p = .017), indicating that participants with stronger social support who had experienced floods were more likely to engage in denial and avoidance behaviors. Additionally, flood experience negatively moderated the relationship between negative emotion regulation and both preparedness (β = − 0.18, p = .035) and denial/avoidance (β = − 0.23, p = .030), suggesting that individuals with higher emotional regulation were less likely to prepare or deny disaster risks after flood exposure. Conclusion These findings highlight the importance of addressing individual resilience capacities and the complexities of prior disaster experiences in disaster preparedness interventions, with particular attention to vulnerable populations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21361-yResilienceCoping strategiesDisaster preparednessDisaster avoidancePrior disaster experienceTaiwan
spellingShingle Yi-Ling Wu
Tsai-Wen Lin
Jason Lam
Samuel S. C. Wang
Herman H. M. Lo
Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan
BMC Public Health
Resilience
Coping strategies
Disaster preparedness
Disaster avoidance
Prior disaster experience
Taiwan
title Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan
title_full Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan
title_fullStr Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan
title_short Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan
title_sort resilience coping strategies and disaster experience a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in taiwan
topic Resilience
Coping strategies
Disaster preparedness
Disaster avoidance
Prior disaster experience
Taiwan
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21361-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yilingwu resiliencecopingstrategiesanddisasterexperienceapathanalysisofpreparednessandavoidanceintaiwan
AT tsaiwenlin resiliencecopingstrategiesanddisasterexperienceapathanalysisofpreparednessandavoidanceintaiwan
AT jasonlam resiliencecopingstrategiesanddisasterexperienceapathanalysisofpreparednessandavoidanceintaiwan
AT samuelscwang resiliencecopingstrategiesanddisasterexperienceapathanalysisofpreparednessandavoidanceintaiwan
AT hermanhmlo resiliencecopingstrategiesanddisasterexperienceapathanalysisofpreparednessandavoidanceintaiwan