Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control

Aim. The aim of this study is to compare dental and skeletal effects produced by an acrylic splint Herbst with and without skeletal anchorage for correction of dental class II malocclusion. Methods. The test group was formed by 14 patients that were treated with an acrylic splint miniscrew-Herbst; m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Manni, Marco Pasini, Laura Mazzotta, Sabrina Mutinelli, Claudio Nuzzo, Felice Roberto Grassi, Mauro Cozzani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/173187
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548563409698816
author Antonio Manni
Marco Pasini
Laura Mazzotta
Sabrina Mutinelli
Claudio Nuzzo
Felice Roberto Grassi
Mauro Cozzani
author_facet Antonio Manni
Marco Pasini
Laura Mazzotta
Sabrina Mutinelli
Claudio Nuzzo
Felice Roberto Grassi
Mauro Cozzani
author_sort Antonio Manni
collection DOAJ
description Aim. The aim of this study is to compare dental and skeletal effects produced by an acrylic splint Herbst with and without skeletal anchorage for correction of dental class II malocclusion. Methods. The test group was formed by 14 patients that were treated with an acrylic splint miniscrew-Herbst; miniscrews were placed between mandibular second premolars and first molars; controls also consisted of 14 subjects that were treated with an acrylic splint Herbst and no miniscrews. Cephalometric measurements before and after Herbst treatment were compared. The value of α for significance was set at 0.05. Results. All subjects from both groups were successfully treated to a bilateral Class I relationship; mean treatment time was 8,1 months in the test group and 7.8 in the controls. Several variables did not have a statistical significant difference between the two groups. Some of the variables, instead, presented a significant difference such as incisor flaring, mandibular bone base position, and skeletal discrepancy. Conclusions. This study showed that the Herbst appliance associated to miniscrews allowed a better control of the incisor flaring with a greater mandibular skeletal effect.
format Article
id doaj-art-b16bf6536c1b4e589c2ece2d60d10af4
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-b16bf6536c1b4e589c2ece2d60d10af42025-02-03T06:13:48ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362014-01-01201410.1155/2014/173187173187Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination ControlAntonio Manni0Marco Pasini1Laura Mazzotta2Sabrina Mutinelli3Claudio Nuzzo4Felice Roberto Grassi5Mauro Cozzani6Private Practice Lecce, Via Giacobina, 6 Racale, 73055 Lecce, ItalyPrivate Practice Massa, Viale Roma 213, 54100 Massa, ItalyOrthodontic Department, Cagliari University, via Binaghi 4, 09121 Cagliari, ItalyPrivate Practice Trento, Viale Roma 20, 38066 Riva del Garda, ItalyHospital Vito Fazzi, Piazza F. Muratore Snc, 73100 Lecce, ItalyInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Università Aldo Moro, Piazza Umberto I, 70121 Bari, ItalyUO Odontoiatria (Istituto Giannina Gaslini), Private Practice, Via Fontevivo 21N, 19125 La Spezia, ItalyAim. The aim of this study is to compare dental and skeletal effects produced by an acrylic splint Herbst with and without skeletal anchorage for correction of dental class II malocclusion. Methods. The test group was formed by 14 patients that were treated with an acrylic splint miniscrew-Herbst; miniscrews were placed between mandibular second premolars and first molars; controls also consisted of 14 subjects that were treated with an acrylic splint Herbst and no miniscrews. Cephalometric measurements before and after Herbst treatment were compared. The value of α for significance was set at 0.05. Results. All subjects from both groups were successfully treated to a bilateral Class I relationship; mean treatment time was 8,1 months in the test group and 7.8 in the controls. Several variables did not have a statistical significant difference between the two groups. Some of the variables, instead, presented a significant difference such as incisor flaring, mandibular bone base position, and skeletal discrepancy. Conclusions. This study showed that the Herbst appliance associated to miniscrews allowed a better control of the incisor flaring with a greater mandibular skeletal effect.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/173187
spellingShingle Antonio Manni
Marco Pasini
Laura Mazzotta
Sabrina Mutinelli
Claudio Nuzzo
Felice Roberto Grassi
Mauro Cozzani
Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control
International Journal of Dentistry
title Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control
title_full Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control
title_fullStr Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control
title_short Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control
title_sort comparison between an acrylic splint herbst and an acrylic splint miniscrew herbst for mandibular incisors proclination control
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/173187
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniomanni comparisonbetweenanacrylicsplintherbstandanacrylicsplintminiscrewherbstformandibularincisorsproclinationcontrol
AT marcopasini comparisonbetweenanacrylicsplintherbstandanacrylicsplintminiscrewherbstformandibularincisorsproclinationcontrol
AT lauramazzotta comparisonbetweenanacrylicsplintherbstandanacrylicsplintminiscrewherbstformandibularincisorsproclinationcontrol
AT sabrinamutinelli comparisonbetweenanacrylicsplintherbstandanacrylicsplintminiscrewherbstformandibularincisorsproclinationcontrol
AT claudionuzzo comparisonbetweenanacrylicsplintherbstandanacrylicsplintminiscrewherbstformandibularincisorsproclinationcontrol
AT felicerobertograssi comparisonbetweenanacrylicsplintherbstandanacrylicsplintminiscrewherbstformandibularincisorsproclinationcontrol
AT maurocozzani comparisonbetweenanacrylicsplintherbstandanacrylicsplintminiscrewherbstformandibularincisorsproclinationcontrol