Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study

Background. Bilateral arm training (BAT) has shown promise in expediting progress toward upper limb recovery in chronic stroke patients, but its neural correlates are poorly understood. Objective. To evaluate changes in upper limb function and EEG power after a robot-assisted BAT in chronic stroke p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marialuisa Gandolfi, Emanuela Formaggio, Christian Geroin, Silvia Francesca Storti, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo, Marta Bortolami, Leopold Saltuari, Alessandro Picelli, Andreas Waldner, Paolo Manganotti, Nicola Smania
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8105480
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558952080998400
author Marialuisa Gandolfi
Emanuela Formaggio
Christian Geroin
Silvia Francesca Storti
Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo
Marta Bortolami
Leopold Saltuari
Alessandro Picelli
Andreas Waldner
Paolo Manganotti
Nicola Smania
author_facet Marialuisa Gandolfi
Emanuela Formaggio
Christian Geroin
Silvia Francesca Storti
Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo
Marta Bortolami
Leopold Saltuari
Alessandro Picelli
Andreas Waldner
Paolo Manganotti
Nicola Smania
author_sort Marialuisa Gandolfi
collection DOAJ
description Background. Bilateral arm training (BAT) has shown promise in expediting progress toward upper limb recovery in chronic stroke patients, but its neural correlates are poorly understood. Objective. To evaluate changes in upper limb function and EEG power after a robot-assisted BAT in chronic stroke patients. Methods. In a within-subject design, seven right-handed chronic stroke patients with upper limb paresis received 21 sessions (3 days/week) of the robot-assisted BAT. The outcomes were changes in score on the upper limb section of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FM), Motricity Index (MI), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluated at the baseline (T0), posttraining (T1), and 1-month follow-up (T2). Event-related desynchronization/synchronization were calculated in the upper alpha and the beta frequency ranges. Results. Significant improvement in all outcomes was measured over the course of the study. Changes in FM were significant at T2, and in MAS at T1 and T2. After training, desynchronization on the ipsilesional sensorimotor areas increased during passive and active movement, as compared with T0. Conclusions. A repetitive robotic-assisted BAT program may improve upper limb motor function and reduce spasticity in the chronically impaired paretic arm. Effects on spasticity were associated with EEG changes over the ipsilesional sensorimotor network.
format Article
id doaj-art-b0be6ff479da488fae0217823b64f61f
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neural Plasticity
spelling doaj-art-b0be6ff479da488fae0217823b64f61f2025-02-03T01:31:14ZengWileyNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432018-01-01201810.1155/2018/81054808105480Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot StudyMarialuisa Gandolfi0Emanuela Formaggio1Christian Geroin2Silvia Francesca Storti3Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo4Marta Bortolami5Leopold Saltuari6Alessandro Picelli7Andreas Waldner8Paolo Manganotti9Nicola Smania10Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, ItalySan Camillo Hospital IRCCS, Venice, ItalyNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Hochzirl Hospital, 6170 Zirl, AustriaNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyResearch Unit for Neurorehabilitation South Tyrol, 39100 Bolzano, ItalyClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital and Health Services of Trieste, University of Trieste, Trieste, ItalyNeuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyBackground. Bilateral arm training (BAT) has shown promise in expediting progress toward upper limb recovery in chronic stroke patients, but its neural correlates are poorly understood. Objective. To evaluate changes in upper limb function and EEG power after a robot-assisted BAT in chronic stroke patients. Methods. In a within-subject design, seven right-handed chronic stroke patients with upper limb paresis received 21 sessions (3 days/week) of the robot-assisted BAT. The outcomes were changes in score on the upper limb section of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FM), Motricity Index (MI), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluated at the baseline (T0), posttraining (T1), and 1-month follow-up (T2). Event-related desynchronization/synchronization were calculated in the upper alpha and the beta frequency ranges. Results. Significant improvement in all outcomes was measured over the course of the study. Changes in FM were significant at T2, and in MAS at T1 and T2. After training, desynchronization on the ipsilesional sensorimotor areas increased during passive and active movement, as compared with T0. Conclusions. A repetitive robotic-assisted BAT program may improve upper limb motor function and reduce spasticity in the chronically impaired paretic arm. Effects on spasticity were associated with EEG changes over the ipsilesional sensorimotor network.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8105480
spellingShingle Marialuisa Gandolfi
Emanuela Formaggio
Christian Geroin
Silvia Francesca Storti
Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo
Marta Bortolami
Leopold Saltuari
Alessandro Picelli
Andreas Waldner
Paolo Manganotti
Nicola Smania
Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study
Neural Plasticity
title Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study
title_full Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study
title_fullStr Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study
title_short Quantification of Upper Limb Motor Recovery and EEG Power Changes after Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study
title_sort quantification of upper limb motor recovery and eeg power changes after robot assisted bilateral arm training in chronic stroke patients a prospective pilot study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8105480
work_keys_str_mv AT marialuisagandolfi quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT emanuelaformaggio quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT christiangeroin quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT silviafrancescastorti quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT ilariaboscologalazzo quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT martabortolami quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT leopoldsaltuari quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT alessandropicelli quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT andreaswaldner quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT paolomanganotti quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy
AT nicolasmania quantificationofupperlimbmotorrecoveryandeegpowerchangesafterrobotassistedbilateralarmtraininginchronicstrokepatientsaprospectivepilotstudy