Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molar after Extraction of Impacted Third Molar

Objective. To evaluate the efficiency of low-level laser therapy on the distal osseous defects of the mandibular second molar (M2) after the adjacent impacted third molar (M3) extraction. Methods. A total of 59 clinic cases were screened out, whose M3 were impacted and the distal alveolar bone of M2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ling-Yu Li, Jie Chen, Ming Yu, Yue-Ling Li, Gang Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9900146
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562554565558272
author Ling-Yu Li
Jie Chen
Ming Yu
Yue-Ling Li
Gang Zhou
author_facet Ling-Yu Li
Jie Chen
Ming Yu
Yue-Ling Li
Gang Zhou
author_sort Ling-Yu Li
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To evaluate the efficiency of low-level laser therapy on the distal osseous defects of the mandibular second molar (M2) after the adjacent impacted third molar (M3) extraction. Methods. A total of 59 clinic cases were screened out, whose M3 were impacted and the distal alveolar bone of M2 had been destroyed horizontally. They were randomly divided into 2 groups based on whether they would have laser irradiation or not after M3 extraction. Then, postoperative complications of the 2 groups were compared. The alveolar bone level distal to M2 was established before and 3 to 6 months after M3 extraction by radiographic evaluation, which was compared between two groups. Results. The incidence of severe pain and mouth-opening limitation was significantly lower in the LLLT group than that in the control group. The amount of bone formation in the LLLT group was higher than that in the control group 3 months after the operation, and the difference was statistically significant. But the difference was not statistically significant 6 months after surgery. Conclusion. LLLT may alleviate postoperative complications and improve early osteogenesis. It is a viable option for use in the treatment of osseous defects distal to mandibular second molars following extraction of impacted third molars.
format Article
id doaj-art-b0a7954d3bb647e2907f89fbd43fc440
institution Kabale University
issn 1754-2103
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
spelling doaj-art-b0a7954d3bb647e2907f89fbd43fc4402025-02-03T01:22:25ZengWileyApplied Bionics and Biomechanics1754-21032022-01-01202210.1155/2022/9900146Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molar after Extraction of Impacted Third MolarLing-Yu Li0Jie Chen1Ming Yu2Yue-Ling Li3Gang Zhou4Dental Comprehensive DepartmentOral and Maxillofacial SurgeryOral and Maxillofacial SurgeryOral and Maxillofacial SurgeryOral and Maxillofacial SurgeryObjective. To evaluate the efficiency of low-level laser therapy on the distal osseous defects of the mandibular second molar (M2) after the adjacent impacted third molar (M3) extraction. Methods. A total of 59 clinic cases were screened out, whose M3 were impacted and the distal alveolar bone of M2 had been destroyed horizontally. They were randomly divided into 2 groups based on whether they would have laser irradiation or not after M3 extraction. Then, postoperative complications of the 2 groups were compared. The alveolar bone level distal to M2 was established before and 3 to 6 months after M3 extraction by radiographic evaluation, which was compared between two groups. Results. The incidence of severe pain and mouth-opening limitation was significantly lower in the LLLT group than that in the control group. The amount of bone formation in the LLLT group was higher than that in the control group 3 months after the operation, and the difference was statistically significant. But the difference was not statistically significant 6 months after surgery. Conclusion. LLLT may alleviate postoperative complications and improve early osteogenesis. It is a viable option for use in the treatment of osseous defects distal to mandibular second molars following extraction of impacted third molars.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9900146
spellingShingle Ling-Yu Li
Jie Chen
Ming Yu
Yue-Ling Li
Gang Zhou
Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molar after Extraction of Impacted Third Molar
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
title Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molar after Extraction of Impacted Third Molar
title_full Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molar after Extraction of Impacted Third Molar
title_fullStr Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molar after Extraction of Impacted Third Molar
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molar after Extraction of Impacted Third Molar
title_short Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molar after Extraction of Impacted Third Molar
title_sort effects of low level laser therapy on osseous defects distal to mandibular second molar after extraction of impacted third molar
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9900146
work_keys_str_mv AT lingyuli effectsoflowlevellasertherapyonosseousdefectsdistaltomandibularsecondmolarafterextractionofimpactedthirdmolar
AT jiechen effectsoflowlevellasertherapyonosseousdefectsdistaltomandibularsecondmolarafterextractionofimpactedthirdmolar
AT mingyu effectsoflowlevellasertherapyonosseousdefectsdistaltomandibularsecondmolarafterextractionofimpactedthirdmolar
AT yuelingli effectsoflowlevellasertherapyonosseousdefectsdistaltomandibularsecondmolarafterextractionofimpactedthirdmolar
AT gangzhou effectsoflowlevellasertherapyonosseousdefectsdistaltomandibularsecondmolarafterextractionofimpactedthirdmolar