Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study

Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa, Dejene Beyene, Million Ebba, Goshu Kenea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567748816797696
author Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa
Dejene Beyene
Million Ebba
Goshu Kenea
author_facet Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa
Dejene Beyene
Million Ebba
Goshu Kenea
author_sort Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa
collection DOAJ
description Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process (MOAEC). The Moringa Oleifera, EC process, and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process are effective mechanisms for the removal of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), phosphate, TSS (Total Suspended Solids), and color from surface water. Different operating parameters such as pH (5–11), the dosage of coagulant (0.2–0.5 g), contact time or reaction time (20–50 minutes), current (0.2–0.5 A), and settling time (5–20 minutes) were considered. The maximum removal efficiency using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process was COD (85.48%), BOD (78.50%), TDS (84.5%), phosphate (95.70%), TSS (93.90%), color (94.50%), and COD (90.50%), BOD (87%), TDS (97.50%), phosphate (89.10%), TSS (95.80%), and color (96.15%), respectively. Similarly, with the application of MOAEC, 91.47%, 89.35%, 97.0%, 90.20%, 9.10%, and 95.70% of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were removed, respectively. The EC process and MOAEC were more effective in the removal of COD, BOD, TDS, TSS, and color than using MO. More phosphate was removed using MO than the EC process and MOAEC. Additionally, the effects of different operating parameters were studied on the removal efficiency.
format Article
id doaj-art-b015490d4dd84a49b6b54f76a6c61a2f
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8779
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-b015490d4dd84a49b6b54f76a6c61a2f2025-02-03T01:00:45ZengWileyInternational Journal of Analytical Chemistry1687-87792022-01-01202210.1155/2022/4640927Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison StudyTofik Gali Aba Lulesa0Dejene Beyene1Million Ebba2Goshu Kenea3Department of Water Supply and Environmental EngineeringDepartment of Water Supply and Environmental EngineeringDepartment of Water Supply and Environmental EngineeringDepartment of Civil EngineeringWater treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process (MOAEC). The Moringa Oleifera, EC process, and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process are effective mechanisms for the removal of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), phosphate, TSS (Total Suspended Solids), and color from surface water. Different operating parameters such as pH (5–11), the dosage of coagulant (0.2–0.5 g), contact time or reaction time (20–50 minutes), current (0.2–0.5 A), and settling time (5–20 minutes) were considered. The maximum removal efficiency using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process was COD (85.48%), BOD (78.50%), TDS (84.5%), phosphate (95.70%), TSS (93.90%), color (94.50%), and COD (90.50%), BOD (87%), TDS (97.50%), phosphate (89.10%), TSS (95.80%), and color (96.15%), respectively. Similarly, with the application of MOAEC, 91.47%, 89.35%, 97.0%, 90.20%, 9.10%, and 95.70% of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were removed, respectively. The EC process and MOAEC were more effective in the removal of COD, BOD, TDS, TSS, and color than using MO. More phosphate was removed using MO than the EC process and MOAEC. Additionally, the effects of different operating parameters were studied on the removal efficiency.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927
spellingShingle Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa
Dejene Beyene
Million Ebba
Goshu Kenea
Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
title Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_full Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_fullStr Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_short Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_sort water treatment using natural coagulant and electrocoagulation process a comparison study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927
work_keys_str_mv AT tofikgaliabalulesa watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy
AT dejenebeyene watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy
AT millionebba watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy
AT goshukenea watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy