Automated Measurements of Tooth Size and Arch Widths on Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography and Scan Images of Plaster Dental Models
Measurements of tooth size for estimating inter-arch tooth size discrepancies and inter-tooth distances, essential for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment, are primarily done using traditional methods involving plaster models and calipers. These methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, requir...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Bioengineering |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/22 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Measurements of tooth size for estimating inter-arch tooth size discrepancies and inter-tooth distances, essential for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment, are primarily done using traditional methods involving plaster models and calipers. These methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, requiring multiple steps. With advances in cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning technology, these processes can now be automated through computer analyses. This study proposes a multi-step computational method for measuring mesiodistal tooth widths and inter-tooth distances, applicable to both CBCT and scan images of plaster models. The first step involves 3D segmentation of the upper and lower teeth using CBCT, combining results from sagittal and panoramic views. For intraoral scans, teeth are segmented from the gums. The second step identifies the teeth based on an adaptively estimated jaw midline using maximum intensity projection. The third step uses a decentralized convolutional neural network to calculate key points representing the parameters. The proposed method was validated against manual measurements by orthodontists using plaster models, achieving an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.967 and a mean absolute error of less than 1 mm for all tooth types. An analysis of variance test confirmed the statistical consistency between the method’s measurements and those of human experts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2306-5354 |