Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply system

Abstract To achieve the UK net‐zero emissions target by 2050, transformations to decarbonise the energy system will be essential. A transition from generating electricity by burning fossil fuel to renewable energy sources (RESs) is one of the most effective ways, in addition to customer transformati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nakaret Kano, Zhongbei Tian, Nutthaka Chinomi, Stuart Hillmansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-09-01
Series:IET Electrical Systems in Transportation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/els2.12048
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559645927931904
author Nakaret Kano
Zhongbei Tian
Nutthaka Chinomi
Stuart Hillmansen
author_facet Nakaret Kano
Zhongbei Tian
Nutthaka Chinomi
Stuart Hillmansen
author_sort Nakaret Kano
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To achieve the UK net‐zero emissions target by 2050, transformations to decarbonise the energy system will be essential. A transition from generating electricity by burning fossil fuel to renewable energy sources (RESs) is one of the most effective ways, in addition to customer transformation, in which people are willing to participate to reduce energy consumption. The railway sector accounts for 0.5% of carbon emissions in the United Kingdom. In order to meet the net‐zero goal, more railway routes must be electrified, as only 38% of railway routes are electrified at present. Furthermore, clean energy is necessary. Therefore, schemes for integrating RESs into the AC high‐speed railway power supply system are proposed and simulated in a case study. Power losses in the power system are comprehensively studied and compared. Owing to the fluctuation of traction load, the power quality issue is inevitable. Thus, the voltage unbalance factor is adopted to measure the severity of the imbalance. The results from the case study demonstrate that the proposed scheme in which the RES is connected to a three‐phase railway power network generates the smallest power losses among all proposed schemes. Moreover, it also requires lower investment expenditure and provides the most significant cost saving in the long run. The results also reveal that the VUFs of all schemes based on a 400 kV transmission system are below the United Kingdom's stringent limit of 1.5%. Furthermore, the CO2 emissions are reduced significantly with RES integration by half for the case study with the 120 MW RES. Although the other proposed schemes had higher losses and lifetime costs, the differences are not significant. Each scheme has its advantages and disadvantages. Several factors need to be considered to choose the suitable scheme, such as the size of land available etc.
format Article
id doaj-art-affea627e5f64fa59c05f793e37efcb5
institution Kabale University
issn 2042-9738
2042-9746
language English
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series IET Electrical Systems in Transportation
spelling doaj-art-affea627e5f64fa59c05f793e37efcb52025-02-03T01:29:38ZengWileyIET Electrical Systems in Transportation2042-97382042-97462022-09-0112320922210.1049/els2.12048Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply systemNakaret Kano0Zhongbei Tian1Nutthaka Chinomi2Stuart Hillmansen3Electronic, Electrical and Systems Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UKElectrical Engineering and Electronics University of Liverpool Liverpool UKElectrical Engineering and Electronics University of Liverpool Liverpool UKElectronic, Electrical and Systems Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UKAbstract To achieve the UK net‐zero emissions target by 2050, transformations to decarbonise the energy system will be essential. A transition from generating electricity by burning fossil fuel to renewable energy sources (RESs) is one of the most effective ways, in addition to customer transformation, in which people are willing to participate to reduce energy consumption. The railway sector accounts for 0.5% of carbon emissions in the United Kingdom. In order to meet the net‐zero goal, more railway routes must be electrified, as only 38% of railway routes are electrified at present. Furthermore, clean energy is necessary. Therefore, schemes for integrating RESs into the AC high‐speed railway power supply system are proposed and simulated in a case study. Power losses in the power system are comprehensively studied and compared. Owing to the fluctuation of traction load, the power quality issue is inevitable. Thus, the voltage unbalance factor is adopted to measure the severity of the imbalance. The results from the case study demonstrate that the proposed scheme in which the RES is connected to a three‐phase railway power network generates the smallest power losses among all proposed schemes. Moreover, it also requires lower investment expenditure and provides the most significant cost saving in the long run. The results also reveal that the VUFs of all schemes based on a 400 kV transmission system are below the United Kingdom's stringent limit of 1.5%. Furthermore, the CO2 emissions are reduced significantly with RES integration by half for the case study with the 120 MW RES. Although the other proposed schemes had higher losses and lifetime costs, the differences are not significant. Each scheme has its advantages and disadvantages. Several factors need to be considered to choose the suitable scheme, such as the size of land available etc.https://doi.org/10.1049/els2.12048carbon emissionhigh‐speed trainpower lossespower systemrailway power systemrenewable energy
spellingShingle Nakaret Kano
Zhongbei Tian
Nutthaka Chinomi
Stuart Hillmansen
Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply system
IET Electrical Systems in Transportation
carbon emission
high‐speed train
power losses
power system
railway power system
renewable energy
title Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply system
title_full Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply system
title_fullStr Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply system
title_short Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply system
title_sort comparison of renewable integration schemes for ac railway power supply system
topic carbon emission
high‐speed train
power losses
power system
railway power system
renewable energy
url https://doi.org/10.1049/els2.12048
work_keys_str_mv AT nakaretkano comparisonofrenewableintegrationschemesforacrailwaypowersupplysystem
AT zhongbeitian comparisonofrenewableintegrationschemesforacrailwaypowersupplysystem
AT nutthakachinomi comparisonofrenewableintegrationschemesforacrailwaypowersupplysystem
AT stuarthillmansen comparisonofrenewableintegrationschemesforacrailwaypowersupplysystem