Evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems.

The contrast between the value placed on discriminatory power in discussions of indexing and classification and on the transformation of a query into a set of relevant records dominant in information retrieval research has not been fully explored. Subsidiary concepts and measures (relevance and prec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Julian Warner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Borås 1999-01-01
Series:Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://informationr.net/ir/4-4/paper62.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568865164361728
author Julian Warner
author_facet Julian Warner
author_sort Julian Warner
collection DOAJ
description The contrast between the value placed on discriminatory power in discussions of indexing and classification and on the transformation of a query into a set of relevant records dominant in information retrieval research has not been fully explored. Subsidiary concepts and measures (relevance and precision and recall) have been increasingly subjected to critiques. An enhanced capacity for informed choice is advocated as an alternative principle for system evaluation and design. This broadly corresponds to: the exploratory capability discussed in recent information retrieval research; the value of discriminatory power in classification and indexing; Giambattista Vicos critique of the unproductivity of Aristotelian methods of categorisation as routes to new knowledge; and, most significantly, to ordinary discourse conceptions of the value of information retrieval systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-af9e45dd386d464cb1952f543ef9acea
institution Kabale University
issn 1368-1613
language English
publishDate 1999-01-01
publisher University of Borås
record_format Article
series Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
spelling doaj-art-af9e45dd386d464cb1952f543ef9acea2025-02-03T00:19:55ZengUniversity of BoråsInformation Research: An International Electronic Journal1368-16131999-01-014462Evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems.Julian WarnerThe contrast between the value placed on discriminatory power in discussions of indexing and classification and on the transformation of a query into a set of relevant records dominant in information retrieval research has not been fully explored. Subsidiary concepts and measures (relevance and precision and recall) have been increasingly subjected to critiques. An enhanced capacity for informed choice is advocated as an alternative principle for system evaluation and design. This broadly corresponds to: the exploratory capability discussed in recent information retrieval research; the value of discriminatory power in classification and indexing; Giambattista Vicos critique of the unproductivity of Aristotelian methods of categorisation as routes to new knowledge; and, most significantly, to ordinary discourse conceptions of the value of information retrieval systems.http://informationr.net/ir/4-4/paper62.htmlinformation retrievalIRevaluation
spellingShingle Julian Warner
Evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems.
Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
information retrieval
IR
evaluation
title Evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems.
title_full Evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems.
title_fullStr Evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems.
title_short Evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems.
title_sort evaluation criteria for information retrieval systems
topic information retrieval
IR
evaluation
url http://informationr.net/ir/4-4/paper62.html
work_keys_str_mv AT julianwarner evaluationcriteriaforinformationretrievalsystems