Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization

Kasamon Aramvanitch,1 Sittichok Leela-Amornsin,2 Welawat Tienpratarn,1 Promphet Nuanprom,1 Supassorn Aussavanodom,1 Chaiyaporn Yuksen,1 Sirinapa Boonsri,1 Natcha Boonjarus,1 Somchoak Sanepim1 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aramvanitch K, Leela-Amornsin S, Tienpratarn W, Nuanprom P, Aussavanodom S, Yuksen C, Boonsri S, Boonjarus N, Sanepim S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2025-01-01
Series:Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/video-laryngoscopy-for-endotracheal-intubation-a-consideration-for-man-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TCRM
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584088222957568
author Aramvanitch K
Leela-Amornsin S
Tienpratarn W
Nuanprom P
Aussavanodom S
Yuksen C
Boonsri S
Boonjarus N
Sanepim S
author_facet Aramvanitch K
Leela-Amornsin S
Tienpratarn W
Nuanprom P
Aussavanodom S
Yuksen C
Boonsri S
Boonjarus N
Sanepim S
author_sort Aramvanitch K
collection DOAJ
description Kasamon Aramvanitch,1 Sittichok Leela-Amornsin,2 Welawat Tienpratarn,1 Promphet Nuanprom,1 Supassorn Aussavanodom,1 Chaiyaporn Yuksen,1 Sirinapa Boonsri,1 Natcha Boonjarus,1 Somchoak Sanepim1 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; 2Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, ThailandCorrespondence: Sittichok Leela-Amornsin, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand, Email sittichok.lee@mahidol.ac.thIntroduction: Traumatic patients with cervical spine motion restriction have difficulty with endotracheal intubation (ETI) due to the limitations of neck movement and mouth opening. Nevertheless, the removal of the cervical collar for ETI in a prehospital setting may lead to a deterioration in neurological outcomes. This study compares the success rate of ETI utilizing a video laryngoscope (VL) on a manikin, contrasting manual in-line stabilization (MILS) without a cervical hard collar against full immobilization.Methods: A randomized, non-crossover study was conducted involving 56 paramedic students assigned by SNOSE to utilize various box sizes for VL intubation with MILS without a cervical hard collar or full immobilization technique on a manikin. The primary outcome was the intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included attempts, time for successful intubation, and Cormack-Lehane classification.Results: Fifty-six participants were evaluated; 28 were in the full immobilization group, and another 28 were in the MILS without cervical hard collar group. Baseline characteristics showed no difference between both groups. The success rate of VL intubation showed no difference between the full immobilization group and the MILS without a cervical hard collar group (28 [100%] vs 28 [100%]; 24 [85.71%] vs 27 [96.43%] on first attempt; 4 [14.29%] vs 1 [3.57%] on second attempt; p-value 0.352). Time required to perform successful intubation (median [IQR] 17.20 [12.53, 24.40] vs 17.53 [14.06, 23.73], p-value 0.694) and Cormack-Lehane classification (11 [39.29%] vs 10 [35.71%] in grade I; 16 [57.14%] vs 17 [60.71%] in grade II; 1 [3.57%] vs 1 [3.57%] in grade III, p-value 1.000) showed no statistical difference between the two groups.Conclusion: It is unnecessary to remove the cervical hard collar when performing endotracheal intubation while using a video laryngoscope.Keywords: video laryngoscope, full immobilization, success rate, endotracheal intubation
format Article
id doaj-art-af7b23ab950f4abe986ec37d025cf1c2
institution Kabale University
issn 1178-203X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
spelling doaj-art-af7b23ab950f4abe986ec37d025cf1c22025-01-27T18:05:34ZengDove Medical PressTherapeutics and Clinical Risk Management1178-203X2025-01-01Volume 2110310999630Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full ImmobilizationAramvanitch KLeela-Amornsin STienpratarn WNuanprom PAussavanodom SYuksen CBoonsri SBoonjarus NSanepim SKasamon Aramvanitch,1 Sittichok Leela-Amornsin,2 Welawat Tienpratarn,1 Promphet Nuanprom,1 Supassorn Aussavanodom,1 Chaiyaporn Yuksen,1 Sirinapa Boonsri,1 Natcha Boonjarus,1 Somchoak Sanepim1 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; 2Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, ThailandCorrespondence: Sittichok Leela-Amornsin, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand, Email sittichok.lee@mahidol.ac.thIntroduction: Traumatic patients with cervical spine motion restriction have difficulty with endotracheal intubation (ETI) due to the limitations of neck movement and mouth opening. Nevertheless, the removal of the cervical collar for ETI in a prehospital setting may lead to a deterioration in neurological outcomes. This study compares the success rate of ETI utilizing a video laryngoscope (VL) on a manikin, contrasting manual in-line stabilization (MILS) without a cervical hard collar against full immobilization.Methods: A randomized, non-crossover study was conducted involving 56 paramedic students assigned by SNOSE to utilize various box sizes for VL intubation with MILS without a cervical hard collar or full immobilization technique on a manikin. The primary outcome was the intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included attempts, time for successful intubation, and Cormack-Lehane classification.Results: Fifty-six participants were evaluated; 28 were in the full immobilization group, and another 28 were in the MILS without cervical hard collar group. Baseline characteristics showed no difference between both groups. The success rate of VL intubation showed no difference between the full immobilization group and the MILS without a cervical hard collar group (28 [100%] vs 28 [100%]; 24 [85.71%] vs 27 [96.43%] on first attempt; 4 [14.29%] vs 1 [3.57%] on second attempt; p-value 0.352). Time required to perform successful intubation (median [IQR] 17.20 [12.53, 24.40] vs 17.53 [14.06, 23.73], p-value 0.694) and Cormack-Lehane classification (11 [39.29%] vs 10 [35.71%] in grade I; 16 [57.14%] vs 17 [60.71%] in grade II; 1 [3.57%] vs 1 [3.57%] in grade III, p-value 1.000) showed no statistical difference between the two groups.Conclusion: It is unnecessary to remove the cervical hard collar when performing endotracheal intubation while using a video laryngoscope.Keywords: video laryngoscope, full immobilization, success rate, endotracheal intubationhttps://www.dovepress.com/video-laryngoscopy-for-endotracheal-intubation-a-consideration-for-man-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TCRMvideo laryngoscopefull immobilizationsuccess rateendotracheal intubation
spellingShingle Aramvanitch K
Leela-Amornsin S
Tienpratarn W
Nuanprom P
Aussavanodom S
Yuksen C
Boonsri S
Boonjarus N
Sanepim S
Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
video laryngoscope
full immobilization
success rate
endotracheal intubation
title Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization
title_full Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization
title_fullStr Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization
title_full_unstemmed Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization
title_short Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization
title_sort video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation a consideration for manual in line stabilization without cervical collar versus full immobilization
topic video laryngoscope
full immobilization
success rate
endotracheal intubation
url https://www.dovepress.com/video-laryngoscopy-for-endotracheal-intubation-a-consideration-for-man-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-TCRM
work_keys_str_mv AT aramvanitchk videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization
AT leelaamornsins videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization
AT tienpratarnw videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization
AT nuanpromp videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization
AT aussavanodoms videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization
AT yuksenc videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization
AT boonsris videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization
AT boonjarusn videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization
AT sanepims videolaryngoscopyforendotrachealintubationaconsiderationformanualinlinestabilizationwithoutcervicalcollarversusfullimmobilization