Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy

Abstract Studies have demonstrated overall prognostic benefits of ICD implantation in patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, results are inconsistent in certain subgroups. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of comorbidities on ICD outcomes and compare trend...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabienne Kreimer, Marie Lewenhardt, Ibrahim El-Battrawy, Arash Haghikia, Michael Gotzmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86022-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585939237470208
author Fabienne Kreimer
Marie Lewenhardt
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Arash Haghikia
Michael Gotzmann
author_facet Fabienne Kreimer
Marie Lewenhardt
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Arash Haghikia
Michael Gotzmann
author_sort Fabienne Kreimer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Studies have demonstrated overall prognostic benefits of ICD implantation in patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, results are inconsistent in certain subgroups. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of comorbidities on ICD outcomes and compare trends in patient selection and outcomes over a decade-long inclusion period. This study analysed 422 patients undergoing ICD implantation between 2011 and 2020. The study endpoint “no-benefit” was characterized by death from any cause occurring without prior appropriate ICD therapy. Benefit of ICD implantation was defined as either receiving appropriate ICD therapy before death or surviving until the end of the observation period. During a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 3.0 years, no-benefit of ICD implantation was observed in 84 patients (20%). Independent risk factors for no-benefit were age ≥ 68 years (HR 4.599, p < 0.001), anemia (HR 2.549, p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (HR 2.066, p = 0.007), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.939, p = 0.014). Subgroup analysis by age < 68 years and ≥ 68 years demonstrated that the risk of no-benefit increases with age and comorbidities. When comparing patients with ICD implantation in 2011–2015 with those in 2016–2020, there were no significant differences in one-, two- and three-year-no-benefit rates. Different comorbidities were associated with no-benefit in the early and late implantation groups. Risk factors such as older age and specific comorbidities are associated with a higher likelihood of no-benefit from ICD implantation. A careful patient selection and consideration of individual risk factors besides advanced age is important.
format Article
id doaj-art-af4140ab46da4811a30844e3bc236902
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-af4140ab46da4811a30844e3bc2369022025-01-26T12:24:12ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111110.1038/s41598-025-86022-xRisk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapyFabienne Kreimer0Marie Lewenhardt1Ibrahim El-Battrawy2Arash Haghikia3Michael Gotzmann4Department of Cardiology II – Rhythmology, University Hospital MünsterDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University BochumDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University BochumDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University BochumDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, St. Josef-Hospital of the Ruhr University BochumAbstract Studies have demonstrated overall prognostic benefits of ICD implantation in patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, results are inconsistent in certain subgroups. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of comorbidities on ICD outcomes and compare trends in patient selection and outcomes over a decade-long inclusion period. This study analysed 422 patients undergoing ICD implantation between 2011 and 2020. The study endpoint “no-benefit” was characterized by death from any cause occurring without prior appropriate ICD therapy. Benefit of ICD implantation was defined as either receiving appropriate ICD therapy before death or surviving until the end of the observation period. During a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 3.0 years, no-benefit of ICD implantation was observed in 84 patients (20%). Independent risk factors for no-benefit were age ≥ 68 years (HR 4.599, p < 0.001), anemia (HR 2.549, p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (HR 2.066, p = 0.007), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.939, p = 0.014). Subgroup analysis by age < 68 years and ≥ 68 years demonstrated that the risk of no-benefit increases with age and comorbidities. When comparing patients with ICD implantation in 2011–2015 with those in 2016–2020, there were no significant differences in one-, two- and three-year-no-benefit rates. Different comorbidities were associated with no-benefit in the early and late implantation groups. Risk factors such as older age and specific comorbidities are associated with a higher likelihood of no-benefit from ICD implantation. A careful patient selection and consideration of individual risk factors besides advanced age is important.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86022-xImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorBenefitNon-benefitRisk factorsComorbiditiesAge
spellingShingle Fabienne Kreimer
Marie Lewenhardt
Ibrahim El-Battrawy
Arash Haghikia
Michael Gotzmann
Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
Scientific Reports
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Benefit
Non-benefit
Risk factors
Comorbidities
Age
title Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
title_full Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
title_fullStr Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
title_short Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
title_sort risk factors for non benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
topic Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Benefit
Non-benefit
Risk factors
Comorbidities
Age
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86022-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiennekreimer riskfactorsfornonbenefitofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT marielewenhardt riskfactorsfornonbenefitofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT ibrahimelbattrawy riskfactorsfornonbenefitofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT arashhaghikia riskfactorsfornonbenefitofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT michaelgotzmann riskfactorsfornonbenefitofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy