Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT

Background and Objectives: Lung cancer screening is critical for early detection and management, particularly through the use of computed tomography (CT). This study aims to compare the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) Version 2022 with the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudiu Avram, Alexandru Ovidiu Mederle, Adelina Mavrea, Paula Irina Barata, Raul Patrascu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Life
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/14
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588154344833024
author Claudiu Avram
Alexandru Ovidiu Mederle
Adelina Mavrea
Paula Irina Barata
Raul Patrascu
author_facet Claudiu Avram
Alexandru Ovidiu Mederle
Adelina Mavrea
Paula Irina Barata
Raul Patrascu
author_sort Claudiu Avram
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objectives: Lung cancer screening is critical for early detection and management, particularly through the use of computed tomography (CT). This study aims to compare the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) Version 2022 with the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines in classifying solid pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening CT examinations. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 224 patients who underwent lung cancer screening CT between 2016 and 2022 and had a reported solid pulmonary nodule. A fellowship-trained thoracic radiologist reviewed the CT images, characterizing nodules by size, location, margins, attenuation, calcification, growth at follow-up, and final pathologic diagnosis if malignant. The sensitivity and specificity of Lung-RADS Version 2022 in detecting malignant nodules were compared with those of the BTS guidelines using the McNemar test. Results: Of the 224 patients, 198 (88%) had nodules deemed benign, while 26 (12%) had malignant nodules. The Lung-RADS Version 2022 resulted in higher specificity than the BTS guidelines (85% vs. 65%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), without sacrificing sensitivity (92% for both). Nodules larger than 8 mm, spiculated margins, upper lobe location, and interval growth were associated with higher malignancy risk (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Conclusions: Compared with the BTS guidelines, Lung-RADS Version 2022 reduces the number of false-positive screening CT examinations while maintaining high sensitivity for detecting malignant solid pulmonary nodules.
format Article
id doaj-art-ae165809f7804e12bf79fe6b0ef4c1ff
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-1729
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Life
spelling doaj-art-ae165809f7804e12bf79fe6b0ef4c1ff2025-01-24T13:38:27ZengMDPI AGLife2075-17292024-12-011511410.3390/life15010014Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CTClaudiu Avram0Alexandru Ovidiu Mederle1Adelina Mavrea2Paula Irina Barata3Raul Patrascu4Doctoral School, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, RomaniaDepartment of Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, RomaniaDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology Clinic, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, RomaniaCenter for Research and Innovation in Precision Medicine of Respiratory Diseases, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, RomaniaDepartment of Functional Science, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, RomaniaBackground and Objectives: Lung cancer screening is critical for early detection and management, particularly through the use of computed tomography (CT). This study aims to compare the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) Version 2022 with the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines in classifying solid pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening CT examinations. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 224 patients who underwent lung cancer screening CT between 2016 and 2022 and had a reported solid pulmonary nodule. A fellowship-trained thoracic radiologist reviewed the CT images, characterizing nodules by size, location, margins, attenuation, calcification, growth at follow-up, and final pathologic diagnosis if malignant. The sensitivity and specificity of Lung-RADS Version 2022 in detecting malignant nodules were compared with those of the BTS guidelines using the McNemar test. Results: Of the 224 patients, 198 (88%) had nodules deemed benign, while 26 (12%) had malignant nodules. The Lung-RADS Version 2022 resulted in higher specificity than the BTS guidelines (85% vs. 65%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), without sacrificing sensitivity (92% for both). Nodules larger than 8 mm, spiculated margins, upper lobe location, and interval growth were associated with higher malignancy risk (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Conclusions: Compared with the BTS guidelines, Lung-RADS Version 2022 reduces the number of false-positive screening CT examinations while maintaining high sensitivity for detecting malignant solid pulmonary nodules.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/14CTlung cancer screeninglung-RADSpulmonary noduleBTS guidelinessolid nodules
spellingShingle Claudiu Avram
Alexandru Ovidiu Mederle
Adelina Mavrea
Paula Irina Barata
Raul Patrascu
Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT
Life
CT
lung cancer screening
lung-RADS
pulmonary nodule
BTS guidelines
solid nodules
title Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT
title_full Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT
title_fullStr Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT
title_short Comparison of Lung-RADS Version 2022 and British Thoracic Society Guidelines in Classifying Solid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at Lung Cancer Screening CT
title_sort comparison of lung rads version 2022 and british thoracic society guidelines in classifying solid pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening ct
topic CT
lung cancer screening
lung-RADS
pulmonary nodule
BTS guidelines
solid nodules
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/14
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiuavram comparisonoflungradsversion2022andbritishthoracicsocietyguidelinesinclassifyingsolidpulmonarynodulesdetectedatlungcancerscreeningct
AT alexandruovidiumederle comparisonoflungradsversion2022andbritishthoracicsocietyguidelinesinclassifyingsolidpulmonarynodulesdetectedatlungcancerscreeningct
AT adelinamavrea comparisonoflungradsversion2022andbritishthoracicsocietyguidelinesinclassifyingsolidpulmonarynodulesdetectedatlungcancerscreeningct
AT paulairinabarata comparisonoflungradsversion2022andbritishthoracicsocietyguidelinesinclassifyingsolidpulmonarynodulesdetectedatlungcancerscreeningct
AT raulpatrascu comparisonoflungradsversion2022andbritishthoracicsocietyguidelinesinclassifyingsolidpulmonarynodulesdetectedatlungcancerscreeningct