‘Modern gardeners’ with Rustic Ideals: Fruitful Congruencies between John Ruskin and William Robinson

William Robinson, a gardener and magazine editor, is usually celebrated as the originator of the wild garden and the English flower garden, aesthetic forms that flourished in the second half of the nineteenth century in England. He greatly admired John Ruskin and made his the latter’s ‘definition of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aurélien Wasilewski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée 2020-06-01
Series:Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/cve/7346
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581255086997504
author Aurélien Wasilewski
author_facet Aurélien Wasilewski
author_sort Aurélien Wasilewski
collection DOAJ
description William Robinson, a gardener and magazine editor, is usually celebrated as the originator of the wild garden and the English flower garden, aesthetic forms that flourished in the second half of the nineteenth century in England. He greatly admired John Ruskin and made his the latter’s ‘definition of the vegetable kingdom [which] is quite different from the definition of botanists generally, but perhaps not on that account less true. ‘Corn for the granary, timber for the builder’s yard, flowers for the bride’s chamber, and moss for the grave’. In a word, food, shelter, and beauty for all of us, living or dead, are the sum total of a world’s vegetation’. This short quote from ‘Ruskin’s garden at Denmark Hill’, published in the December 11 issue of The Garden, 1886, sums up the extent of what William Robinson shared with John Ruskin, from his aesthetic theories to his social commitments, spiritual stance or environmental conscience. In fact, it appears that William Robinson read Ruskin extensively, but rather exclusively from the point of view of the gardener and we would argue that William Robinson considered John Ruskin’s work as an inspirational matrix on which he could base his aesthetic choices, new gardening practices, and even editorial and literary enterprises. In an attempt at mapping the numerous outcrops of Ruskin’s body of work in Robinson’s garden publishing, this paper will endeavour to untangle the ties between the two Victorian gardeners. To what extent were the views of those ‘modern gardeners’ on ‘flora and the vegetable kingdom’ congruent? What stylistic and formal developments did such elective affinities entail in their respective gardens and theories? What ethical considerations underlie such new gardens and practices?
format Article
id doaj-art-ad6a174da77f46d6ad45abd5187d9c08
institution Kabale University
issn 0220-5610
2271-6149
language English
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée
record_format Article
series Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
spelling doaj-art-ad6a174da77f46d6ad45abd5187d9c082025-01-30T10:22:13ZengPresses Universitaires de la MéditerranéeCahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens0220-56102271-61492020-06-019110.4000/cve.7346‘Modern gardeners’ with Rustic Ideals: Fruitful Congruencies between John Ruskin and William RobinsonAurélien WasilewskiWilliam Robinson, a gardener and magazine editor, is usually celebrated as the originator of the wild garden and the English flower garden, aesthetic forms that flourished in the second half of the nineteenth century in England. He greatly admired John Ruskin and made his the latter’s ‘definition of the vegetable kingdom [which] is quite different from the definition of botanists generally, but perhaps not on that account less true. ‘Corn for the granary, timber for the builder’s yard, flowers for the bride’s chamber, and moss for the grave’. In a word, food, shelter, and beauty for all of us, living or dead, are the sum total of a world’s vegetation’. This short quote from ‘Ruskin’s garden at Denmark Hill’, published in the December 11 issue of The Garden, 1886, sums up the extent of what William Robinson shared with John Ruskin, from his aesthetic theories to his social commitments, spiritual stance or environmental conscience. In fact, it appears that William Robinson read Ruskin extensively, but rather exclusively from the point of view of the gardener and we would argue that William Robinson considered John Ruskin’s work as an inspirational matrix on which he could base his aesthetic choices, new gardening practices, and even editorial and literary enterprises. In an attempt at mapping the numerous outcrops of Ruskin’s body of work in Robinson’s garden publishing, this paper will endeavour to untangle the ties between the two Victorian gardeners. To what extent were the views of those ‘modern gardeners’ on ‘flora and the vegetable kingdom’ congruent? What stylistic and formal developments did such elective affinities entail in their respective gardens and theories? What ethical considerations underlie such new gardens and practices?https://journals.openedition.org/cve/7346natureaestheticsethicsRuskin (John)Robinson (William)alpine garden
spellingShingle Aurélien Wasilewski
‘Modern gardeners’ with Rustic Ideals: Fruitful Congruencies between John Ruskin and William Robinson
Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
nature
aesthetics
ethics
Ruskin (John)
Robinson (William)
alpine garden
title ‘Modern gardeners’ with Rustic Ideals: Fruitful Congruencies between John Ruskin and William Robinson
title_full ‘Modern gardeners’ with Rustic Ideals: Fruitful Congruencies between John Ruskin and William Robinson
title_fullStr ‘Modern gardeners’ with Rustic Ideals: Fruitful Congruencies between John Ruskin and William Robinson
title_full_unstemmed ‘Modern gardeners’ with Rustic Ideals: Fruitful Congruencies between John Ruskin and William Robinson
title_short ‘Modern gardeners’ with Rustic Ideals: Fruitful Congruencies between John Ruskin and William Robinson
title_sort modern gardeners with rustic ideals fruitful congruencies between john ruskin and william robinson
topic nature
aesthetics
ethics
Ruskin (John)
Robinson (William)
alpine garden
url https://journals.openedition.org/cve/7346
work_keys_str_mv AT aurelienwasilewski moderngardenerswithrusticidealsfruitfulcongruenciesbetweenjohnruskinandwilliamrobinson