Sonographic Assessment of Intravascular Fluid Estimate (SAFE) Score by Using Bedside Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit

Objective. The objective of the study was to use an ultrasound-based numerical scoring system for assessment of intravascular fluid estimate (SAFE) and test its validity. Methods. A prospective, observational study was carried out in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of an urban tertiary care t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keith Killu, Victor Coba, Dionne Blyden, Semeret Munie, Darlene Dereczyk, Pridvi Kandagatla, Amy Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Critical Care Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9719751
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550999165763584
author Keith Killu
Victor Coba
Dionne Blyden
Semeret Munie
Darlene Dereczyk
Pridvi Kandagatla
Amy Tang
author_facet Keith Killu
Victor Coba
Dionne Blyden
Semeret Munie
Darlene Dereczyk
Pridvi Kandagatla
Amy Tang
author_sort Keith Killu
collection DOAJ
description Objective. The objective of the study was to use an ultrasound-based numerical scoring system for assessment of intravascular fluid estimate (SAFE) and test its validity. Methods. A prospective, observational study was carried out in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of an urban tertiary care teaching hospital. Patient’s intravascular volume status was assessed using the standard methods of heart rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output, lactate and saturation of venous oxygen, and others. This was compared with assessment using bedside ultrasound evaluation of the cardiac function, inferior vena cava, lungs, and the internal jugular vein. Applying a numerical scoring system was evaluated by Fisher’s exact testing and multinomial logistic model to predict the volume status based on ultrasound scores and the classification accuracy. Results. 61 patients in the ICU were evaluated. 21 (34.4% of total) patients diagnosed with hypovolemia, and their ultrasound volume score was −4 in 14 (66.7%) patients, −3 in 5 (23.8%) patients, and 0 in 2 (9.5%) patients (p<0.001). 18 (29.5% of total) patients diagnosed with euvolemia, and their ultrasound volume score was 0 in 11 (61.1%) patients, +1 in 4 (22.2%) patients, and −1 in 1 (5.6%) patient (p<0.001). 22 (36.1% of total) patients diagnosed with hypervolemia, and their ultrasound volume score was +4 in 4 (18.2%) patients, +3 in 15 (68.2%) patients, and  + 1 in 1 (4.6%) patient (p<0.001). We found a strong association between standard measures and the ultrasound score (p<0.001). Conclusion. Using the SAFE scoring system to identify the IVV status in critically ill patients significantly correlates with the standard measures. A SAFE score of −4 to −2 more likely represents hypovolemia, −1 to +1 more likely represents euvolemia, and +2 to +4 more likely to be hypervolemia.
format Article
id doaj-art-ad48125dc5454c8099a38d7d470405ed
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1305
2090-1313
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Critical Care Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-ad48125dc5454c8099a38d7d470405ed2025-02-03T06:05:13ZengWileyCritical Care Research and Practice2090-13052090-13132020-01-01202010.1155/2020/97197519719751Sonographic Assessment of Intravascular Fluid Estimate (SAFE) Score by Using Bedside Ultrasound in the Intensive Care UnitKeith Killu0Victor Coba1Dionne Blyden2Semeret Munie3Darlene Dereczyk4Pridvi Kandagatla5Amy Tang6Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USADepartment of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USADepartment of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USAMedical College of Wisconsin, Department of Minimally Invasive and General Surgery, Wauwatosa, WI, USADepartment of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USADepartment of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USADepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USAObjective. The objective of the study was to use an ultrasound-based numerical scoring system for assessment of intravascular fluid estimate (SAFE) and test its validity. Methods. A prospective, observational study was carried out in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of an urban tertiary care teaching hospital. Patient’s intravascular volume status was assessed using the standard methods of heart rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output, lactate and saturation of venous oxygen, and others. This was compared with assessment using bedside ultrasound evaluation of the cardiac function, inferior vena cava, lungs, and the internal jugular vein. Applying a numerical scoring system was evaluated by Fisher’s exact testing and multinomial logistic model to predict the volume status based on ultrasound scores and the classification accuracy. Results. 61 patients in the ICU were evaluated. 21 (34.4% of total) patients diagnosed with hypovolemia, and their ultrasound volume score was −4 in 14 (66.7%) patients, −3 in 5 (23.8%) patients, and 0 in 2 (9.5%) patients (p<0.001). 18 (29.5% of total) patients diagnosed with euvolemia, and their ultrasound volume score was 0 in 11 (61.1%) patients, +1 in 4 (22.2%) patients, and −1 in 1 (5.6%) patient (p<0.001). 22 (36.1% of total) patients diagnosed with hypervolemia, and their ultrasound volume score was +4 in 4 (18.2%) patients, +3 in 15 (68.2%) patients, and  + 1 in 1 (4.6%) patient (p<0.001). We found a strong association between standard measures and the ultrasound score (p<0.001). Conclusion. Using the SAFE scoring system to identify the IVV status in critically ill patients significantly correlates with the standard measures. A SAFE score of −4 to −2 more likely represents hypovolemia, −1 to +1 more likely represents euvolemia, and +2 to +4 more likely to be hypervolemia.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9719751
spellingShingle Keith Killu
Victor Coba
Dionne Blyden
Semeret Munie
Darlene Dereczyk
Pridvi Kandagatla
Amy Tang
Sonographic Assessment of Intravascular Fluid Estimate (SAFE) Score by Using Bedside Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit
Critical Care Research and Practice
title Sonographic Assessment of Intravascular Fluid Estimate (SAFE) Score by Using Bedside Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit
title_full Sonographic Assessment of Intravascular Fluid Estimate (SAFE) Score by Using Bedside Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr Sonographic Assessment of Intravascular Fluid Estimate (SAFE) Score by Using Bedside Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed Sonographic Assessment of Intravascular Fluid Estimate (SAFE) Score by Using Bedside Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit
title_short Sonographic Assessment of Intravascular Fluid Estimate (SAFE) Score by Using Bedside Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit
title_sort sonographic assessment of intravascular fluid estimate safe score by using bedside ultrasound in the intensive care unit
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9719751
work_keys_str_mv AT keithkillu sonographicassessmentofintravascularfluidestimatesafescorebyusingbedsideultrasoundintheintensivecareunit
AT victorcoba sonographicassessmentofintravascularfluidestimatesafescorebyusingbedsideultrasoundintheintensivecareunit
AT dionneblyden sonographicassessmentofintravascularfluidestimatesafescorebyusingbedsideultrasoundintheintensivecareunit
AT semeretmunie sonographicassessmentofintravascularfluidestimatesafescorebyusingbedsideultrasoundintheintensivecareunit
AT darlenedereczyk sonographicassessmentofintravascularfluidestimatesafescorebyusingbedsideultrasoundintheintensivecareunit
AT pridvikandagatla sonographicassessmentofintravascularfluidestimatesafescorebyusingbedsideultrasoundintheintensivecareunit
AT amytang sonographicassessmentofintravascularfluidestimatesafescorebyusingbedsideultrasoundintheintensivecareunit