On derivative consequence argument
The article gives critical remarks to the derivative consequence argument proposed by Bogdan Faul. The first critical remark concerns the ontological status of the laws of nature, the second remark deals with the term «physicalism». It is demonstrated that conceptual vagueness of the terms used b...
Saved in:
Main Author: | D. N. Razeev |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/66-68%20%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%94.%20%D0%9D..pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Are pure mental states conceivable?
by: D. N. Razeev
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Physicalism and moral responsibility: presentation of derivative consequence argument
by: B. V. Faul
Published: (2020-12-01) -
New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
by: B. V. Faul
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Conditional analysis of free will and consequence argument
by: M. A. Sekatskaya
Published: (2020-12-01) -
To what theories of laws of nature B. Faul’s argument is applicable?
by: T. S. Demin
Published: (2020-12-01)