Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer

ObjectiveTo compare different intestinal reconstruction methods after intestinal resection for advanced ovarian malignancy.MethodsRetrospective data of patients with advanced ovarian malignancy were collected and then assigned into three groups: primary intestinal anastomosis, protective enterostomy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huimin Wang, Xiaocen Li, Ying Jiang, Jinxin Chen, Rong Cao, Jingru Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1500042/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585087555731456
author Huimin Wang
Xiaocen Li
Ying Jiang
Jinxin Chen
Rong Cao
Jingru Zhang
author_facet Huimin Wang
Xiaocen Li
Ying Jiang
Jinxin Chen
Rong Cao
Jingru Zhang
author_sort Huimin Wang
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo compare different intestinal reconstruction methods after intestinal resection for advanced ovarian malignancy.MethodsRetrospective data of patients with advanced ovarian malignancy were collected and then assigned into three groups: primary intestinal anastomosis, protective enterostomy and colostomy. General clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings and postoperative outcomes were compared between the three groups.ResultsA total of 530 cases were included for final analysis. The colostomy group had a lower serum albumin level, larger volume of ascites, higher likelihood of multiple intestinal resections and lower likelihood of rectal resection, lower peritoneal cancer index, more intraoperative blood loss, transfusions and infusions, lower likelihood of optimal cytoreductive surgery and shorter interval time to chemotherapy than the other two groups (p < 0.05). The primary intestinal anastomosis group exhibited a larger blood transfusion volume, higher incidence rates of anastomotic leak and electrolyte disturbance, and longer times to first flatus, first feeding and drain removal than the other two groups (p < 0.05).ConclusionsColostomy can be adopted for advanced ovarian cancer patients with a large ascites volume, hypoproteinemia, large intraoperative blood and fluid loss volumes, multiple intestinal resections, anastomoses located below the peritoneal reflection, high PCI and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery. For patients with good intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, one anastomosis, an anastomosis located above the peritoneal reflection, low PCI or optimal cytoreductive surgery, intestinal anastomosis can be carried out to restore the normal physiological function of the intestine. For patients with a large volume of ascites (≥500 mL), multiple anastomoses or an anastomosis located below the peritoneal reflection, intestinal anastomosis combined with protective enterostomy has an advantage over intestinal anastomosis alone.
format Article
id doaj-art-ad214900bc1d47f9ae9669b9d8e911ef
institution Kabale University
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj-art-ad214900bc1d47f9ae9669b9d8e911ef2025-01-27T05:14:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2025-01-011510.3389/fonc.2025.15000421500042Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancerHuimin WangXiaocen LiYing JiangJinxin ChenRong CaoJingru ZhangObjectiveTo compare different intestinal reconstruction methods after intestinal resection for advanced ovarian malignancy.MethodsRetrospective data of patients with advanced ovarian malignancy were collected and then assigned into three groups: primary intestinal anastomosis, protective enterostomy and colostomy. General clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings and postoperative outcomes were compared between the three groups.ResultsA total of 530 cases were included for final analysis. The colostomy group had a lower serum albumin level, larger volume of ascites, higher likelihood of multiple intestinal resections and lower likelihood of rectal resection, lower peritoneal cancer index, more intraoperative blood loss, transfusions and infusions, lower likelihood of optimal cytoreductive surgery and shorter interval time to chemotherapy than the other two groups (p < 0.05). The primary intestinal anastomosis group exhibited a larger blood transfusion volume, higher incidence rates of anastomotic leak and electrolyte disturbance, and longer times to first flatus, first feeding and drain removal than the other two groups (p < 0.05).ConclusionsColostomy can be adopted for advanced ovarian cancer patients with a large ascites volume, hypoproteinemia, large intraoperative blood and fluid loss volumes, multiple intestinal resections, anastomoses located below the peritoneal reflection, high PCI and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery. For patients with good intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, one anastomosis, an anastomosis located above the peritoneal reflection, low PCI or optimal cytoreductive surgery, intestinal anastomosis can be carried out to restore the normal physiological function of the intestine. For patients with a large volume of ascites (≥500 mL), multiple anastomoses or an anastomosis located below the peritoneal reflection, intestinal anastomosis combined with protective enterostomy has an advantage over intestinal anastomosis alone.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1500042/fulladvanced ovarian cancerintestinal resectionintestinal reconstructionprotective enterostomyanastomotic leak
spellingShingle Huimin Wang
Xiaocen Li
Ying Jiang
Jinxin Chen
Rong Cao
Jingru Zhang
Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer
Frontiers in Oncology
advanced ovarian cancer
intestinal resection
intestinal reconstruction
protective enterostomy
anastomotic leak
title Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer
title_full Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer
title_short Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer
title_sort clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer
topic advanced ovarian cancer
intestinal resection
intestinal reconstruction
protective enterostomy
anastomotic leak
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1500042/full
work_keys_str_mv AT huiminwang clinicalanalysisofdifferentintestinalreconstructionmethodsafterprimarycytoreductivesurgerycombinedwithrectalresectionforadvancedovariancancer
AT xiaocenli clinicalanalysisofdifferentintestinalreconstructionmethodsafterprimarycytoreductivesurgerycombinedwithrectalresectionforadvancedovariancancer
AT yingjiang clinicalanalysisofdifferentintestinalreconstructionmethodsafterprimarycytoreductivesurgerycombinedwithrectalresectionforadvancedovariancancer
AT jinxinchen clinicalanalysisofdifferentintestinalreconstructionmethodsafterprimarycytoreductivesurgerycombinedwithrectalresectionforadvancedovariancancer
AT rongcao clinicalanalysisofdifferentintestinalreconstructionmethodsafterprimarycytoreductivesurgerycombinedwithrectalresectionforadvancedovariancancer
AT jingruzhang clinicalanalysisofdifferentintestinalreconstructionmethodsafterprimarycytoreductivesurgerycombinedwithrectalresectionforadvancedovariancancer