Performance Comparison of Doppler Scale Estimation Methods for Underwater Acoustic OFDM

Doppler scale estimation is one critical step needed by the resampling operation in acoustic communication receivers. In this paper, we compare different Doppler scale estimation methods using either cyclic-prefixed (CP) or zero-padded (ZP) orthogonal-frequency division-multiplexing (OFDM) waveforms...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Wan, Zhaohui Wang, Shengli Zhou, T. C. Yang, Zhijie Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/703243
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555556019109888
author Lei Wan
Zhaohui Wang
Shengli Zhou
T. C. Yang
Zhijie Shi
author_facet Lei Wan
Zhaohui Wang
Shengli Zhou
T. C. Yang
Zhijie Shi
author_sort Lei Wan
collection DOAJ
description Doppler scale estimation is one critical step needed by the resampling operation in acoustic communication receivers. In this paper, we compare different Doppler scale estimation methods using either cyclic-prefixed (CP) or zero-padded (ZP) orthogonal-frequency division-multiplexing (OFDM) waveforms. For a CP-OFDM preamble, a self-correlation method allows for blind Doppler scale estimation based on an embedded repetition structure while a cross-correlation method is available with the knowledge of the waveform. For each received ZP-OFDM block, the existence of null subcarriers allows for blind Doppler scale estimation. In addition, a pilot-aided method and a decision-aided method are applicable based on cross-correlation with templates constructed from symbols on pilot subcarriers only and from symbols on all subcarriers after data decoding, respectively. This paper carries out extensive comparisons among these methods using both simulated and real experimental data. Further, the applicabilities of these methods to distributed multiuser systems are investigated.
format Article
id doaj-art-ad1f3d79dd1149ebb64608d9b8ee6cd1
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0147
2090-0155
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
spelling doaj-art-ad1f3d79dd1149ebb64608d9b8ee6cd12025-02-03T05:47:52ZengWileyJournal of Electrical and Computer Engineering2090-01472090-01552012-01-01201210.1155/2012/703243703243Performance Comparison of Doppler Scale Estimation Methods for Underwater Acoustic OFDMLei Wan0Zhaohui Wang1Shengli Zhou2T. C. Yang3Zhijie Shi4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, 371 Fairfield Way U-2157, Storrs, CT 06269, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, 371 Fairfield Way U-2157, Storrs, CT 06269, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, 371 Fairfield Way U-2157, Storrs, CT 06269, USANational Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 371 Fairfield Way U-2155, Storrs, CT 06269, USADoppler scale estimation is one critical step needed by the resampling operation in acoustic communication receivers. In this paper, we compare different Doppler scale estimation methods using either cyclic-prefixed (CP) or zero-padded (ZP) orthogonal-frequency division-multiplexing (OFDM) waveforms. For a CP-OFDM preamble, a self-correlation method allows for blind Doppler scale estimation based on an embedded repetition structure while a cross-correlation method is available with the knowledge of the waveform. For each received ZP-OFDM block, the existence of null subcarriers allows for blind Doppler scale estimation. In addition, a pilot-aided method and a decision-aided method are applicable based on cross-correlation with templates constructed from symbols on pilot subcarriers only and from symbols on all subcarriers after data decoding, respectively. This paper carries out extensive comparisons among these methods using both simulated and real experimental data. Further, the applicabilities of these methods to distributed multiuser systems are investigated.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/703243
spellingShingle Lei Wan
Zhaohui Wang
Shengli Zhou
T. C. Yang
Zhijie Shi
Performance Comparison of Doppler Scale Estimation Methods for Underwater Acoustic OFDM
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
title Performance Comparison of Doppler Scale Estimation Methods for Underwater Acoustic OFDM
title_full Performance Comparison of Doppler Scale Estimation Methods for Underwater Acoustic OFDM
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Doppler Scale Estimation Methods for Underwater Acoustic OFDM
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Doppler Scale Estimation Methods for Underwater Acoustic OFDM
title_short Performance Comparison of Doppler Scale Estimation Methods for Underwater Acoustic OFDM
title_sort performance comparison of doppler scale estimation methods for underwater acoustic ofdm
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/703243
work_keys_str_mv AT leiwan performancecomparisonofdopplerscaleestimationmethodsforunderwateracousticofdm
AT zhaohuiwang performancecomparisonofdopplerscaleestimationmethodsforunderwateracousticofdm
AT shenglizhou performancecomparisonofdopplerscaleestimationmethodsforunderwateracousticofdm
AT tcyang performancecomparisonofdopplerscaleestimationmethodsforunderwateracousticofdm
AT zhijieshi performancecomparisonofdopplerscaleestimationmethodsforunderwateracousticofdm