Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach

Background: Living donor nephrectomies (LDN) at our institution transitioned from open access to laparoscopic and, more recently, to a minimally invasive robotic surgical approach between 2019 and 2022. Concurrently, postoperative analgesia transitioned from regional anesthesia to intravenous patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amer Majeed, Noon E. Abdelgadir, Areej A.G. AlFattani, Bilal Tufail, Muhammad Shabbir, Sajjad Rasool, Basel A. Jobeir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/sja.sja_425_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087046585319424
author Amer Majeed
Noon E. Abdelgadir
Areej A.G. AlFattani
Bilal Tufail
Muhammad Shabbir
Sajjad Rasool
Basel A. Jobeir
author_facet Amer Majeed
Noon E. Abdelgadir
Areej A.G. AlFattani
Bilal Tufail
Muhammad Shabbir
Sajjad Rasool
Basel A. Jobeir
author_sort Amer Majeed
collection DOAJ
description Background: Living donor nephrectomies (LDN) at our institution transitioned from open access to laparoscopic and, more recently, to a minimally invasive robotic surgical approach between 2019 and 2022. Concurrently, postoperative analgesia transitioned from regional anesthesia to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and eventually to simple analgesics with additional rescue analgesic agents, as needed, in accordance with individual physicians’ preferences. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the impact of these changes on surgical practice on the analgesic requirements and effectiveness of postoperative pain management. Methods: Electronic records of all LDN cases operated between January 2019 and March 2022 were accessed, and a comparative analysis of patient demographics, surgical approach, duration of surgery, postoperative pain scores, and the analgesics administered within the first 48 h was performed. Results: LDN (n = 527) was performed via laparoscopic (n = 432, 82%), robotic (n = 87, 17%), and open (n = 8, 2%) approaches. All patients were administered regular paracetamol 1 g 6 hourly. IV PCA was used in 85% of cases, predominantly in the laparoscopic (99%) and open (75%) groups (LG and OG, respectively); in contrast, the robotic group (RG) was mostly treated without PCA (81.7%). A variety of analgesic techniques were employed for the remaining patients, including epidural (25% of OG) and rectus sheath/transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block (2% of LG). Additional rescue analgesics were administered to 98% of the patients; 92% of LG needed 1–3 analgesic agents, whereas all of the OG and 37% of RG needed 1–2 rescue analgesics. No correlation was found between patient demographics and surgery duration on pain scores or analgesic requirements. Conclusions: Robotic surgery was associated with the lowest postoperative pain scores and analgesic demand; laparoscopic resection was the most painful of all.
format Article
id doaj-art-acc3dab8b89f4c329946ec73ea11f5bc
institution Kabale University
issn 1658-354X
0975-3125
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj-art-acc3dab8b89f4c329946ec73ea11f5bc2025-02-06T07:24:16ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia1658-354X0975-31252025-01-01191394410.4103/sja.sja_425_24Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approachAmer MajeedNoon E. AbdelgadirAreej A.G. AlFattaniBilal TufailMuhammad ShabbirSajjad RasoolBasel A. JobeirBackground: Living donor nephrectomies (LDN) at our institution transitioned from open access to laparoscopic and, more recently, to a minimally invasive robotic surgical approach between 2019 and 2022. Concurrently, postoperative analgesia transitioned from regional anesthesia to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and eventually to simple analgesics with additional rescue analgesic agents, as needed, in accordance with individual physicians’ preferences. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the impact of these changes on surgical practice on the analgesic requirements and effectiveness of postoperative pain management. Methods: Electronic records of all LDN cases operated between January 2019 and March 2022 were accessed, and a comparative analysis of patient demographics, surgical approach, duration of surgery, postoperative pain scores, and the analgesics administered within the first 48 h was performed. Results: LDN (n = 527) was performed via laparoscopic (n = 432, 82%), robotic (n = 87, 17%), and open (n = 8, 2%) approaches. All patients were administered regular paracetamol 1 g 6 hourly. IV PCA was used in 85% of cases, predominantly in the laparoscopic (99%) and open (75%) groups (LG and OG, respectively); in contrast, the robotic group (RG) was mostly treated without PCA (81.7%). A variety of analgesic techniques were employed for the remaining patients, including epidural (25% of OG) and rectus sheath/transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block (2% of LG). Additional rescue analgesics were administered to 98% of the patients; 92% of LG needed 1–3 analgesic agents, whereas all of the OG and 37% of RG needed 1–2 rescue analgesics. No correlation was found between patient demographics and surgery duration on pain scores or analgesic requirements. Conclusions: Robotic surgery was associated with the lowest postoperative pain scores and analgesic demand; laparoscopic resection was the most painful of all.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/sja.sja_425_24laparoscopyliving donor nephrectomypatient-controlled analgesiapostoperative painrobotic surgical procedures
spellingShingle Amer Majeed
Noon E. Abdelgadir
Areej A.G. AlFattani
Bilal Tufail
Muhammad Shabbir
Sajjad Rasool
Basel A. Jobeir
Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
laparoscopy
living donor nephrectomy
patient-controlled analgesia
postoperative pain
robotic surgical procedures
title Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach
title_full Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach
title_fullStr Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach
title_short Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach
title_sort evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach
topic laparoscopy
living donor nephrectomy
patient-controlled analgesia
postoperative pain
robotic surgical procedures
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/sja.sja_425_24
work_keys_str_mv AT amermajeed evaluationofacutepostoperativepainmanagementafterlivingdonornephrectomyduringthetransitionfromopenaccesstolaparoscopicandminimallyinvasiveroboticsurgicalapproach
AT nooneabdelgadir evaluationofacutepostoperativepainmanagementafterlivingdonornephrectomyduringthetransitionfromopenaccesstolaparoscopicandminimallyinvasiveroboticsurgicalapproach
AT areejagalfattani evaluationofacutepostoperativepainmanagementafterlivingdonornephrectomyduringthetransitionfromopenaccesstolaparoscopicandminimallyinvasiveroboticsurgicalapproach
AT bilaltufail evaluationofacutepostoperativepainmanagementafterlivingdonornephrectomyduringthetransitionfromopenaccesstolaparoscopicandminimallyinvasiveroboticsurgicalapproach
AT muhammadshabbir evaluationofacutepostoperativepainmanagementafterlivingdonornephrectomyduringthetransitionfromopenaccesstolaparoscopicandminimallyinvasiveroboticsurgicalapproach
AT sajjadrasool evaluationofacutepostoperativepainmanagementafterlivingdonornephrectomyduringthetransitionfromopenaccesstolaparoscopicandminimallyinvasiveroboticsurgicalapproach
AT baselajobeir evaluationofacutepostoperativepainmanagementafterlivingdonornephrectomyduringthetransitionfromopenaccesstolaparoscopicandminimallyinvasiveroboticsurgicalapproach