Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device
Purpose. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on the glottic opening area during general anesthesia using remifentanil. Methods. Ninety patients undergoing hand and upper limb surgery combined with brachial plexus block under general anesthesia we...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Anesthesiology Research and Practice |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1302898 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832555124641234944 |
---|---|
author | Takashi Kondo Hiromichi Izumi Makiko Kitagawa |
author_facet | Takashi Kondo Hiromichi Izumi Makiko Kitagawa |
author_sort | Takashi Kondo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on the glottic opening area during general anesthesia using remifentanil. Methods. Ninety patients undergoing hand and upper limb surgery combined with brachial plexus block under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into three groups to receive desflurane (group D), sevoflurane (group S), or propofol (group P) for maintenance of anesthesia. Following induction of general anesthesia with remifentanil, continuous fiberoptic video recording around the glottis via an i-gel™ supraglottic device was started after establishing mechanical ventilation. Desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol was administrated after video recording was started. The changes in normalized glottic opening area (n-GOA) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during surgery were compared between the three groups. Results. Intraoperative changes of n-GOA in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (−0.0656 ± 0.0772 vs. −0.0076 ± 0.0499 and +0.0269 ± 0.0809, P=0.005 and P<0.0001). The changes of PIP in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (+3.7 ± 3.4 cmH2O vs. +1.0 ± 1.3 cmH2O and −0.3 ± 3.6 cmH2O, P=0.002 and P<0.0001). Four cases of relapsed glottic stenosis in group D were improved by changing desflurane to propofol. Conclusions. Desflurane narrowed the n-GOA and increased the PIP compared to sevoflurane and propofol during general anesthesia with remifentanil. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of glottic stenosis during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia when the airway is secured by a supraglottic airway device without the use of neuromuscular blockade. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-ac26c4c85f0a49e7a2a7941762071ccf |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-6962 1687-6970 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Anesthesiology Research and Practice |
spelling | doaj-art-ac26c4c85f0a49e7a2a7941762071ccf2025-02-03T05:49:34ZengWileyAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702020-01-01202010.1155/2020/13028981302898Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway DeviceTakashi Kondo0Hiromichi Izumi1Makiko Kitagawa2Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, JapanDepartment of Anesthesia, Akane Foundation Tsuchiya General Hospital, Hiroshima, JapanDepartment of Anesthesia, Akane Foundation Tsuchiya General Hospital, Hiroshima, JapanPurpose. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol on the glottic opening area during general anesthesia using remifentanil. Methods. Ninety patients undergoing hand and upper limb surgery combined with brachial plexus block under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into three groups to receive desflurane (group D), sevoflurane (group S), or propofol (group P) for maintenance of anesthesia. Following induction of general anesthesia with remifentanil, continuous fiberoptic video recording around the glottis via an i-gel™ supraglottic device was started after establishing mechanical ventilation. Desflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol was administrated after video recording was started. The changes in normalized glottic opening area (n-GOA) and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during surgery were compared between the three groups. Results. Intraoperative changes of n-GOA in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (−0.0656 ± 0.0772 vs. −0.0076 ± 0.0499 and +0.0269 ± 0.0809, P=0.005 and P<0.0001). The changes of PIP in group D showed significant differences compared with group S and group P (+3.7 ± 3.4 cmH2O vs. +1.0 ± 1.3 cmH2O and −0.3 ± 3.6 cmH2O, P=0.002 and P<0.0001). Four cases of relapsed glottic stenosis in group D were improved by changing desflurane to propofol. Conclusions. Desflurane narrowed the n-GOA and increased the PIP compared to sevoflurane and propofol during general anesthesia with remifentanil. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of glottic stenosis during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia when the airway is secured by a supraglottic airway device without the use of neuromuscular blockade.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1302898 |
spellingShingle | Takashi Kondo Hiromichi Izumi Makiko Kitagawa Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device Anesthesiology Research and Practice |
title | Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device |
title_full | Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device |
title_short | Comparison of the Effects of Desflurane, Sevoflurane, and Propofol on the Glottic Opening Area during Remifentanil-Based General Anesthesia Using a Supraglottic Airway Device |
title_sort | comparison of the effects of desflurane sevoflurane and propofol on the glottic opening area during remifentanil based general anesthesia using a supraglottic airway device |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1302898 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takashikondo comparisonoftheeffectsofdesfluranesevofluraneandpropofolontheglotticopeningareaduringremifentanilbasedgeneralanesthesiausingasupraglotticairwaydevice AT hiromichiizumi comparisonoftheeffectsofdesfluranesevofluraneandpropofolontheglotticopeningareaduringremifentanilbasedgeneralanesthesiausingasupraglotticairwaydevice AT makikokitagawa comparisonoftheeffectsofdesfluranesevofluraneandpropofolontheglotticopeningareaduringremifentanilbasedgeneralanesthesiausingasupraglotticairwaydevice |