Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate new software (Unfold AI) in the estimation of prostate tumour volume (TV) and prediction of focal therapy outcomes. Subjects/patients and methods Subjects were 204 men with prostate cancer (PCa) of grade groups 2–4 (GG ≥ 2), who were enrolled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wayne G. Brisbane, Alan M. Priester, Anissa V. Nguyen, Mark Topoozian, Sakina Mota, Merdie K. Delfin, Samantha Gonzalez, Kyla P. Grunden, Shannon Richardson, Shyam Natarajan, Leonard S. Marks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:BJUI Compass
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.456
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576707327950848
author Wayne G. Brisbane
Alan M. Priester
Anissa V. Nguyen
Mark Topoozian
Sakina Mota
Merdie K. Delfin
Samantha Gonzalez
Kyla P. Grunden
Shannon Richardson
Shyam Natarajan
Leonard S. Marks
author_facet Wayne G. Brisbane
Alan M. Priester
Anissa V. Nguyen
Mark Topoozian
Sakina Mota
Merdie K. Delfin
Samantha Gonzalez
Kyla P. Grunden
Shannon Richardson
Shyam Natarajan
Leonard S. Marks
author_sort Wayne G. Brisbane
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate new software (Unfold AI) in the estimation of prostate tumour volume (TV) and prediction of focal therapy outcomes. Subjects/patients and methods Subjects were 204 men with prostate cancer (PCa) of grade groups 2–4 (GG ≥ 2), who were enrolled in a trial of partial gland cryoablation (PGA) at UCLA from 2017 to 2022. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐guided biopsy (MRGB) was performed at diagnosis and at 6 and 18 months following PGA. Utilising Unfold AI (FDA‐cleared 2022), which generates a 3D map of GG ≥ 2 PCa margins, we retrospectively estimated TV for each patient. TV was compared against conventional baseline variables as a correlate of a successful primary outcome—defined here as the absence of GG ≥ 2 on follow‐up MRGB at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were MRGB at 18 months and failure‐free survival, that is, lack of metastasis or salvage whole gland therapy. Receiver operating curves and multivariate analysis were used to determine significance. Results A successful primary outcome was observed in 77.7% of patients. Significant correlates of a successful ablation were percent pattern 4 and TV; areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.60 and 0.73, respectively. GG was not a correlate of success (AUC = 0.51). A TV of 1.5 cc provided the optimal combination of sensitivity (55.8%) and specificity (85.7%) at 6 months. TV was also significantly associated with secondary outcomes. In multivariate analysis, TV was the variable most associated with 6‐ and 18‐month biopsy success (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] were 6.1 and 4.2). Utilising TV ≤ 1.5 cc as a PGA criterion would have prevented 72% of failures at the cost of 42% of successes. Conclusion The AI‐based software Unfold AI estimates TV, which is significantly associated with biopsy outcomes after focal cryoablation. The rate of treatment success is inversely related to TV.
format Article
id doaj-art-abf17c4c9c5d426b94a753fb2cf59e44
institution Kabale University
issn 2688-4526
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj-art-abf17c4c9c5d426b94a753fb2cf59e442025-01-31T00:14:32ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262025-01-0161n/an/a10.1002/bco2.456Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomesWayne G. Brisbane0Alan M. Priester1Anissa V. Nguyen2Mark Topoozian3Sakina Mota4Merdie K. Delfin5Samantha Gonzalez6Kyla P. Grunden7Shannon Richardson8Shyam Natarajan9Leonard S. Marks10Department of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USAAvenda Health Culver City California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USADepartment of Urology, Institute of Urologic Oncology UCLA Los Angeles California USAAbstract Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate new software (Unfold AI) in the estimation of prostate tumour volume (TV) and prediction of focal therapy outcomes. Subjects/patients and methods Subjects were 204 men with prostate cancer (PCa) of grade groups 2–4 (GG ≥ 2), who were enrolled in a trial of partial gland cryoablation (PGA) at UCLA from 2017 to 2022. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐guided biopsy (MRGB) was performed at diagnosis and at 6 and 18 months following PGA. Utilising Unfold AI (FDA‐cleared 2022), which generates a 3D map of GG ≥ 2 PCa margins, we retrospectively estimated TV for each patient. TV was compared against conventional baseline variables as a correlate of a successful primary outcome—defined here as the absence of GG ≥ 2 on follow‐up MRGB at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were MRGB at 18 months and failure‐free survival, that is, lack of metastasis or salvage whole gland therapy. Receiver operating curves and multivariate analysis were used to determine significance. Results A successful primary outcome was observed in 77.7% of patients. Significant correlates of a successful ablation were percent pattern 4 and TV; areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.60 and 0.73, respectively. GG was not a correlate of success (AUC = 0.51). A TV of 1.5 cc provided the optimal combination of sensitivity (55.8%) and specificity (85.7%) at 6 months. TV was also significantly associated with secondary outcomes. In multivariate analysis, TV was the variable most associated with 6‐ and 18‐month biopsy success (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] were 6.1 and 4.2). Utilising TV ≤ 1.5 cc as a PGA criterion would have prevented 72% of failures at the cost of 42% of successes. Conclusion The AI‐based software Unfold AI estimates TV, which is significantly associated with biopsy outcomes after focal cryoablation. The rate of treatment success is inversely related to TV.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.456artificial intelligencefocal therapyMRIprostate cancertumour volume
spellingShingle Wayne G. Brisbane
Alan M. Priester
Anissa V. Nguyen
Mark Topoozian
Sakina Mota
Merdie K. Delfin
Samantha Gonzalez
Kyla P. Grunden
Shannon Richardson
Shyam Natarajan
Leonard S. Marks
Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes
BJUI Compass
artificial intelligence
focal therapy
MRI
prostate cancer
tumour volume
title Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes
title_full Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes
title_fullStr Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes
title_short Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes
title_sort focal therapy of prostate cancer use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes
topic artificial intelligence
focal therapy
MRI
prostate cancer
tumour volume
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.456
work_keys_str_mv AT waynegbrisbane focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT alanmpriester focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT anissavnguyen focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT marktopoozian focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT sakinamota focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT merdiekdelfin focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT samanthagonzalez focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT kylapgrunden focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT shannonrichardson focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT shyamnatarajan focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes
AT leonardsmarks focaltherapyofprostatecanceruseofartificialintelligencetodefinetumourvolumeandpredicttreatmentoutcomes