Silences and Vulnerabilities

In 1999, Sweden introduced legislation that prohibits and criminalises the purchase of sex – while continuing to decriminalise the selling of sex. Referred to as the ‘Swedish model’, or the ‘Nordic model’ after neighbouring countries followed suit, this legal framework is built on an understanding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suruchi Thapar-Björkert, Marion Stevens, Åsa Eriksson, Johanna Gondouin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Johannesburg 2023-06-01
Series:The Thinker
Online Access:https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/2518
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583671863836672
author Suruchi Thapar-Björkert
Marion Stevens
Åsa Eriksson
Johanna Gondouin
author_facet Suruchi Thapar-Björkert
Marion Stevens
Åsa Eriksson
Johanna Gondouin
author_sort Suruchi Thapar-Björkert
collection DOAJ
description In 1999, Sweden introduced legislation that prohibits and criminalises the purchase of sex – while continuing to decriminalise the selling of sex. Referred to as the ‘Swedish model’, or the ‘Nordic model’ after neighbouring countries followed suit, this legal framework is built on an understanding of ‘prostitution’ as exploitation and a form of violence against women. Examined through this lens, the selling of sex can never be regarded as work. Through its feminist foreign policy platform (in place between 2014 and 2022), Sweden declared that it would engage in ‘persistent and robust commitment and agency’ to encourage other countries to adopt similar legal frameworks. Yet, evidence of the presumed success of the Swedish model is scant at best, with recent research raising concerns over how the Sex Purchase Act in conjunction with immigration law and third-party regulation has contributed to increased vulnerability of migrant sex workers – who make up the majority of people selling sex in the Nordic region (Vuolajärvi, 2019). In South Africa, both the selling and buying of sex is criminalised, in spite of the country being party to several international treaties that recognise the right to free choice of work. As decriminalisation of sex work in South Africa is currently high on the public agenda, and the ‘Swedish model’ is one of the alternatives discussed, critically examining the possible consequences of adopting this model is crucial. In this paper, we draw on research and activist interventions in Sweden and South Africa to examine the possible implications of the adoption of the ‘Swedish model’ in South Africa – a country with markedly different historical and demographic trajectories, migratory patterns, and a much less extensive and supported social welfare system. We caution that such a move may not achieve the aim of reducing sex workers’ vulnerability and exposure to violence. Furthermore, framing the selling of sex as violence rather than work may risk silencing causes for social justice by stripping sex workers of their agency and autonomy, while simultaneously casting them as victims.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab72606251d94037a7e87abfcffc8c1a
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-2458
2616-907X
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher University of Johannesburg
record_format Article
series The Thinker
spelling doaj-art-ab72606251d94037a7e87abfcffc8c1a2025-01-28T09:01:57ZengUniversity of JohannesburgThe Thinker2075-24582616-907X2023-06-0195210.36615/the_thinker.v95i2.2518Silences and VulnerabilitiesSuruchi Thapar-BjörkertMarion StevensÅsa ErikssonJohanna Gondouin In 1999, Sweden introduced legislation that prohibits and criminalises the purchase of sex – while continuing to decriminalise the selling of sex. Referred to as the ‘Swedish model’, or the ‘Nordic model’ after neighbouring countries followed suit, this legal framework is built on an understanding of ‘prostitution’ as exploitation and a form of violence against women. Examined through this lens, the selling of sex can never be regarded as work. Through its feminist foreign policy platform (in place between 2014 and 2022), Sweden declared that it would engage in ‘persistent and robust commitment and agency’ to encourage other countries to adopt similar legal frameworks. Yet, evidence of the presumed success of the Swedish model is scant at best, with recent research raising concerns over how the Sex Purchase Act in conjunction with immigration law and third-party regulation has contributed to increased vulnerability of migrant sex workers – who make up the majority of people selling sex in the Nordic region (Vuolajärvi, 2019). In South Africa, both the selling and buying of sex is criminalised, in spite of the country being party to several international treaties that recognise the right to free choice of work. As decriminalisation of sex work in South Africa is currently high on the public agenda, and the ‘Swedish model’ is one of the alternatives discussed, critically examining the possible consequences of adopting this model is crucial. In this paper, we draw on research and activist interventions in Sweden and South Africa to examine the possible implications of the adoption of the ‘Swedish model’ in South Africa – a country with markedly different historical and demographic trajectories, migratory patterns, and a much less extensive and supported social welfare system. We caution that such a move may not achieve the aim of reducing sex workers’ vulnerability and exposure to violence. Furthermore, framing the selling of sex as violence rather than work may risk silencing causes for social justice by stripping sex workers of their agency and autonomy, while simultaneously casting them as victims. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/2518
spellingShingle Suruchi Thapar-Björkert
Marion Stevens
Åsa Eriksson
Johanna Gondouin
Silences and Vulnerabilities
The Thinker
title Silences and Vulnerabilities
title_full Silences and Vulnerabilities
title_fullStr Silences and Vulnerabilities
title_full_unstemmed Silences and Vulnerabilities
title_short Silences and Vulnerabilities
title_sort silences and vulnerabilities
url https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/2518
work_keys_str_mv AT suruchithaparbjorkert silencesandvulnerabilities
AT marionstevens silencesandvulnerabilities
AT asaeriksson silencesandvulnerabilities
AT johannagondouin silencesandvulnerabilities