Las nominaciones de Dios en el argumento del Proslogion

Saint Anselm of Canterbury was a Benedictine monk who wrote the Proslogion argument in the 11th century. The nominations or names of God, are the different ways by which Saint Anselm explained the divine attributes. From a reinterpretation of Ricardo O. Díez’s study ¿Si hay Dios, quién es? an identi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: José Luis Gaona Carrillo
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Instituto de Estudos Medievais 2022-01-01
Series:Medievalista
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/medievalista/5149
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832580490599596032
author José Luis Gaona Carrillo
author_facet José Luis Gaona Carrillo
author_sort José Luis Gaona Carrillo
collection DOAJ
description Saint Anselm of Canterbury was a Benedictine monk who wrote the Proslogion argument in the 11th century. The nominations or names of God, are the different ways by which Saint Anselm explained the divine attributes. From a reinterpretation of Ricardo O. Díez’s study ¿Si hay Dios, quién es? an identity between the being and the truth of God is proposed, thus implying a mutual relationship between these attributes with the Anselmian definition of truth. The sentence fides quaerens intellectum will represent a methodology or model through which the thought is oriented in the rational clarification of these divine nominations. However, the same intellectual search will recognize a rational limitation against what it believes by faith. The nominations of the Proslogion and the definition of the truth of the De Veritate allow us to think of an identity that relates both works of Anselmian thought, identity that this article wanted to propose.
format Article
id doaj-art-ab302a199ca1405fa4c8dbe66d950d2f
institution Kabale University
issn 1646-740X
language deu
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Instituto de Estudos Medievais
record_format Article
series Medievalista
spelling doaj-art-ab302a199ca1405fa4c8dbe66d950d2f2025-01-30T10:52:53ZdeuInstituto de Estudos MedievaisMedievalista1646-740X2022-01-013110.4000/medievalista.5149Las nominaciones de Dios en el argumento del ProslogionJosé Luis Gaona CarrilloSaint Anselm of Canterbury was a Benedictine monk who wrote the Proslogion argument in the 11th century. The nominations or names of God, are the different ways by which Saint Anselm explained the divine attributes. From a reinterpretation of Ricardo O. Díez’s study ¿Si hay Dios, quién es? an identity between the being and the truth of God is proposed, thus implying a mutual relationship between these attributes with the Anselmian definition of truth. The sentence fides quaerens intellectum will represent a methodology or model through which the thought is oriented in the rational clarification of these divine nominations. However, the same intellectual search will recognize a rational limitation against what it believes by faith. The nominations of the Proslogion and the definition of the truth of the De Veritate allow us to think of an identity that relates both works of Anselmian thought, identity that this article wanted to propose.https://journals.openedition.org/medievalista/5149identitySaint AnselmProslogionDe Veritatefides quaerens intellectum
spellingShingle José Luis Gaona Carrillo
Las nominaciones de Dios en el argumento del Proslogion
Medievalista
identity
Saint Anselm
Proslogion
De Veritate
fides quaerens intellectum
title Las nominaciones de Dios en el argumento del Proslogion
title_full Las nominaciones de Dios en el argumento del Proslogion
title_fullStr Las nominaciones de Dios en el argumento del Proslogion
title_full_unstemmed Las nominaciones de Dios en el argumento del Proslogion
title_short Las nominaciones de Dios en el argumento del Proslogion
title_sort las nominaciones de dios en el argumento del proslogion
topic identity
Saint Anselm
Proslogion
De Veritate
fides quaerens intellectum
url https://journals.openedition.org/medievalista/5149
work_keys_str_mv AT joseluisgaonacarrillo lasnominacionesdediosenelargumentodelproslogion