Association of Digital Health Interventions With Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundGestational weight gain (GWG) is crucial to maternal and neonatal health, yet many women fail to meet recommended guidelines, increasing the risk of complications. Digital health interventions offer promising solutions, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. Thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianing Wang, Nu Tang, Congcong Jin, Jianxue Yang, Xiangpeng Zheng, Qiujing Jiang, Shengping Li, Nian Xiao, Xiaojun Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-03-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e66580
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BackgroundGestational weight gain (GWG) is crucial to maternal and neonatal health, yet many women fail to meet recommended guidelines, increasing the risk of complications. Digital health interventions offer promising solutions, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This study evaluates the impact of such interventions on GWG and other maternal and neonatal outcomes. ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effect of digital health interventions among pregnant women and newborns. MethodsA total of 2 independent researchers performed electronic literature searches in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies published from their inception until February 2024; an updated search was conducted in August 2024. The studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used to examine the risk of publication bias. Stata (version 15.1; StataCorp) was used to analyze the data. ResultsWe incorporated 42 pertinent RCTs involving 148,866 participants. In comparison to the routine care group, GWG was markedly reduced in the intervention group (standardized mean difference–0.19, 95% CI –0.25 to –0.13; P<.001). A significant reduction was observed in the proportion of women with excessive weight gain (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91; P=.001), along with an increase in the proportion of women with adequate weight gain (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.64; P=.003). Although no significant difference was reported for the proportion of individuals below standardized weight gain, there is a significant reduction in the risk of miscarriage (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.95; P=.03), preterm birth (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.75-0.86; P<.001), as well as complex neonatal outcomes (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99; P=.02). Other maternal and fetal outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups (all P>.05). ConclusionsThe findings corroborate our hypothesis that digitally facilitated health care can enhance certain facets of maternal and neonatal outcomes, particularly by mitigating excessive weight and maintaining individuals within a reasonable weight gain range. Therefore, encouraging women to join the digital health team sounds feasible and helpful. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42024564331; https://tinyurl.com/5n6bshjt
ISSN:1438-8871