Filozofie analytická vs. kontinentální: na obranu dělení

In his On the Very Analytic-Continental Division in Philosophy, Šebela presents three objections against dividing contemporary philosophy into analytic and continental. He calls them a factual objection, a methodological objection, and a power objection. In this paper, I will scrutinize the three o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ivo Dragoun
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Institute of Philosophy SAS, v.v.i. 2025-05-01
Series:Filozofia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.savba.sk/index.php/filozofia/article/view/3775
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In his On the Very Analytic-Continental Division in Philosophy, Šebela presents three objections against dividing contemporary philosophy into analytic and continental. He calls them a factual objection, a methodological objection, and a power objection. In this paper, I will scrutinize the three objections and show that each of them ultimately fails. My motivation is to clear the theoretical path for those who wish to explore and reflect on the fascinating methodological presuppositions that constitute the division of contemporary philosophy into analytic and continental.
ISSN:0046-385X
2585-7061