Testing a Conceptual Lumped Model in Karst Area, Southwest China

Karst aquifers are known for their heterogeneous physical properties and irregular complex flow patterns which make it a challenge to describe the hydrological behavior and to quantitatively define the distribution of river flow components using hydrologic models. In this paper, a conceptual lumped...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peng Shi, Mi Zhou, Simin Qu, Xi Chen, Xueyuan Qiao, Zhicai Zhang, Xinxin Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Applied Mathematics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/827980
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849395605591293952
author Peng Shi
Mi Zhou
Simin Qu
Xi Chen
Xueyuan Qiao
Zhicai Zhang
Xinxin Ma
author_facet Peng Shi
Mi Zhou
Simin Qu
Xi Chen
Xueyuan Qiao
Zhicai Zhang
Xinxin Ma
author_sort Peng Shi
collection DOAJ
description Karst aquifers are known for their heterogeneous physical properties and irregular complex flow patterns which make it a challenge to describe the hydrological behavior and to quantitatively define the distribution of river flow components using hydrologic models. In this paper, a conceptual lumped hydrologic model, Xin’anjiang model (XAJ), was applied in Sancha River, which is a karst basin in southwest China, for the simulation of streamflow. The performance of XAJ model was evaluated based on the model’s ability to reproduce the streamflow and baseflow. Percentage of bias (PBIAS), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and standard deviation (RSR) were calculated between the simulated and measured flow for both calibration and validation period. The low PBIAS and RSR (2.7% and 0.367 for calibration period, 1.3% and 0.376 for validation period) and the high NSE and R2 (0.866 and 0.866 for calibration period, 0.858 and 0.860 for validation period) indicate that the model structure and parameters are of reasonable validity. Furthermore, streamflow was separated to baseflow and surface flow using the “baseflow programme,” and the calculated results indicate that the model could also reproduce the response of baseflow in such karst system.
format Article
id doaj-art-aa34855030f44d73b3d6b24e8bc3e1e7
institution Kabale University
issn 1110-757X
1687-0042
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Mathematics
spelling doaj-art-aa34855030f44d73b3d6b24e8bc3e1e72025-08-20T03:39:32ZengWileyJournal of Applied Mathematics1110-757X1687-00422013-01-01201310.1155/2013/827980827980Testing a Conceptual Lumped Model in Karst Area, Southwest ChinaPeng Shi0Mi Zhou1Simin Qu2Xi Chen3Xueyuan Qiao4Zhicai Zhang5Xinxin Ma6State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydrology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydrology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydrology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydrology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Hydrology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaKarst aquifers are known for their heterogeneous physical properties and irregular complex flow patterns which make it a challenge to describe the hydrological behavior and to quantitatively define the distribution of river flow components using hydrologic models. In this paper, a conceptual lumped hydrologic model, Xin’anjiang model (XAJ), was applied in Sancha River, which is a karst basin in southwest China, for the simulation of streamflow. The performance of XAJ model was evaluated based on the model’s ability to reproduce the streamflow and baseflow. Percentage of bias (PBIAS), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and standard deviation (RSR) were calculated between the simulated and measured flow for both calibration and validation period. The low PBIAS and RSR (2.7% and 0.367 for calibration period, 1.3% and 0.376 for validation period) and the high NSE and R2 (0.866 and 0.866 for calibration period, 0.858 and 0.860 for validation period) indicate that the model structure and parameters are of reasonable validity. Furthermore, streamflow was separated to baseflow and surface flow using the “baseflow programme,” and the calculated results indicate that the model could also reproduce the response of baseflow in such karst system.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/827980
spellingShingle Peng Shi
Mi Zhou
Simin Qu
Xi Chen
Xueyuan Qiao
Zhicai Zhang
Xinxin Ma
Testing a Conceptual Lumped Model in Karst Area, Southwest China
Journal of Applied Mathematics
title Testing a Conceptual Lumped Model in Karst Area, Southwest China
title_full Testing a Conceptual Lumped Model in Karst Area, Southwest China
title_fullStr Testing a Conceptual Lumped Model in Karst Area, Southwest China
title_full_unstemmed Testing a Conceptual Lumped Model in Karst Area, Southwest China
title_short Testing a Conceptual Lumped Model in Karst Area, Southwest China
title_sort testing a conceptual lumped model in karst area southwest china
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/827980
work_keys_str_mv AT pengshi testingaconceptuallumpedmodelinkarstareasouthwestchina
AT mizhou testingaconceptuallumpedmodelinkarstareasouthwestchina
AT siminqu testingaconceptuallumpedmodelinkarstareasouthwestchina
AT xichen testingaconceptuallumpedmodelinkarstareasouthwestchina
AT xueyuanqiao testingaconceptuallumpedmodelinkarstareasouthwestchina
AT zhicaizhang testingaconceptuallumpedmodelinkarstareasouthwestchina
AT xinxinma testingaconceptuallumpedmodelinkarstareasouthwestchina