Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR

Abstract We study the energy–momentum characteristics of the rotating black hole–Kerr solution of general relativity in the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) and the symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (STEGR). The previously constructed spacetime-covariant and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. D. Emtsova, A. N. Petrov, A. V. Toporensky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-01-01
Series:European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13718-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594500952784896
author E. D. Emtsova
A. N. Petrov
A. V. Toporensky
author_facet E. D. Emtsova
A. N. Petrov
A. V. Toporensky
author_sort E. D. Emtsova
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We study the energy–momentum characteristics of the rotating black hole–Kerr solution of general relativity in the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) and the symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (STEGR). The previously constructed spacetime-covariant and Lorentz-invariant expressions for conserved Noether currents, superpotentials, and charges are used. The Noether charges describe the total energy, momentum, or angular momentum of a gravitational system depending on the choice of displacement vector $$\xi $$ ξ . To define the covariant and invariant conserved quantities in both TEGR and STEGR, one needs to use external fields which are flat teleparallel connections. To determine the non-dynamical connections in TEGR and STEGR, we use the unified “turning-off” gravity principle. In addition, to analyze the Noether conserved quantities in these theories, we use the concept of “gauges.” Changes in the gauge can affect the Noether conserved quantities. We highlight two ways to turn off gravity—by $$M \rightarrow 0$$ M → 0 and by $$M \rightarrow 0, ~ a \rightarrow 0$$ M → 0 , a → 0 —which give us different gauges in TEGR and STEGR. In both kinds of gauges, we obtain the expected values of black hole mass and angular momentum. Our attempts to find gauges which could lead to a correspondence to Einstein’s equivalence principle for the Kerr solution were unsuccessful in both TEGR and STEGR. However, these exercises helped us to find a related gauge for the Schwarzschild solution in STEGR that is a novel finding.
format Article
id doaj-art-aa188e6285854822901b114a756a763a
institution Kabale University
issn 1434-6052
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
spelling doaj-art-aa188e6285854822901b114a756a763a2025-01-19T12:36:40ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60522025-01-0185111710.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13718-1Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGRE. D. Emtsova0A. N. Petrov1A. V. Toporensky2Physics Department, Ariel UniversitySternberg Astronomical Institute, MV Lomonosov State UniversitySternberg Astronomical Institute, MV Lomonosov State UniversityAbstract We study the energy–momentum characteristics of the rotating black hole–Kerr solution of general relativity in the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) and the symmetric teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (STEGR). The previously constructed spacetime-covariant and Lorentz-invariant expressions for conserved Noether currents, superpotentials, and charges are used. The Noether charges describe the total energy, momentum, or angular momentum of a gravitational system depending on the choice of displacement vector $$\xi $$ ξ . To define the covariant and invariant conserved quantities in both TEGR and STEGR, one needs to use external fields which are flat teleparallel connections. To determine the non-dynamical connections in TEGR and STEGR, we use the unified “turning-off” gravity principle. In addition, to analyze the Noether conserved quantities in these theories, we use the concept of “gauges.” Changes in the gauge can affect the Noether conserved quantities. We highlight two ways to turn off gravity—by $$M \rightarrow 0$$ M → 0 and by $$M \rightarrow 0, ~ a \rightarrow 0$$ M → 0 , a → 0 —which give us different gauges in TEGR and STEGR. In both kinds of gauges, we obtain the expected values of black hole mass and angular momentum. Our attempts to find gauges which could lead to a correspondence to Einstein’s equivalence principle for the Kerr solution were unsuccessful in both TEGR and STEGR. However, these exercises helped us to find a related gauge for the Schwarzschild solution in STEGR that is a novel finding.https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13718-1
spellingShingle E. D. Emtsova
A. N. Petrov
A. V. Toporensky
Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
title Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR
title_full Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR
title_fullStr Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR
title_full_unstemmed Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR
title_short Mass and angular momentum for the Kerr black hole in TEGR and STEGR
title_sort mass and angular momentum for the kerr black hole in tegr and stegr
url https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13718-1
work_keys_str_mv AT edemtsova massandangularmomentumforthekerrblackholeintegrandstegr
AT anpetrov massandangularmomentumforthekerrblackholeintegrandstegr
AT avtoporensky massandangularmomentumforthekerrblackholeintegrandstegr