Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
<h4>Background</h4>A meta-analysis as part of a systematic review aims to provide a thorough, comprehensive and unbiased statistical summary of data from the literature. However, relevant study results could be missing from a meta-analysis because of selective publication and inadequate...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Christine M Schmucker, Anette Blümle, Lisa K Schell, Guido Schwarzer, Patrick Oeller, Laura Cabrera, Erik von Elm, Matthias Briel, Joerg J Meerpohl, OPEN consortium |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176210 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Unclear Predication in the Construction
by: Christopher DESURMONT
Published: (2012-03-01) -
Clear, Unclear and Non-media − an Attempt at Conceptualisation
by: János Tóth, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
How Much Participant Outcome Data Is Missing from Sight: Findings from a Cohort of Trials Submitted to a German Research Ethics Committee.
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Arterial Thromboembolism in a Patient With Cancer With Unclear Etiology
by: Taylor A. Hopper, et al.
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study
by: Joerg J Meerpohl, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)