Voluntary Spatial Attention has Different Effects on Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades

Although numerous studies have investigated the relationship between saccadic eye movements and spatial attention, one fundamental issue remains controversial. Some studies have suggested that spatial attention facilitates saccades, whereas others have claimed that eye movements are actually inhibit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie K. Seidlits, Tammie Reza, Kevin A. Briand, Anne B. Sereno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2003-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.72
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550370057912320
author Stephanie K. Seidlits
Tammie Reza
Kevin A. Briand
Anne B. Sereno
author_facet Stephanie K. Seidlits
Tammie Reza
Kevin A. Briand
Anne B. Sereno
author_sort Stephanie K. Seidlits
collection DOAJ
description Although numerous studies have investigated the relationship between saccadic eye movements and spatial attention, one fundamental issue remains controversial. Some studies have suggested that spatial attention facilitates saccades, whereas others have claimed that eye movements are actually inhibited when spatial attention is engaged. However, these discrepancies may be because previous research has neglected to separate and specify the effects of attention for two distinct types of saccades, namely reflexive (stimulus-directed) and voluntary (antisaccades). The present study explored the effects of voluntary spatial attention on both voluntary and reflexive saccades. Results indicate that voluntary spatial attention has different effects on the two types of saccades. Antisaccades were always greatly facilitated following the engagement of spatial attention by symbolic cues (arrows) informing the subject where the upcoming saccade should be directed. Reflexive saccades showed little or no cueing effects and exhibited significant facilitation only when these cues were randomly intermixed with uncued trials. In addition, the present study tested the effects of fixation condition (gap, step, and overlap) on attentional modulation. Cueing effects did not vary due to fixation condition. Thus, voluntary spatial attention consistently showed different effects on voluntary and reflexive saccades, and there was no evidence in these studies that voluntary cues inhibit reflexive saccades, even in a gap paradigm.
format Article
id doaj-art-a9b53d389ea54aff9b6490a32841da1b
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2003-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-a9b53d389ea54aff9b6490a32841da1b2025-02-03T06:06:58ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2003-01-01388190210.1100/tsw.2003.72Voluntary Spatial Attention has Different Effects on Voluntary and Reflexive SaccadesStephanie K. Seidlits0Tammie Reza1Kevin A. Briand2Anne B. Sereno3Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy and the Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy and the Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy and the Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy and the Keck Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USAAlthough numerous studies have investigated the relationship between saccadic eye movements and spatial attention, one fundamental issue remains controversial. Some studies have suggested that spatial attention facilitates saccades, whereas others have claimed that eye movements are actually inhibited when spatial attention is engaged. However, these discrepancies may be because previous research has neglected to separate and specify the effects of attention for two distinct types of saccades, namely reflexive (stimulus-directed) and voluntary (antisaccades). The present study explored the effects of voluntary spatial attention on both voluntary and reflexive saccades. Results indicate that voluntary spatial attention has different effects on the two types of saccades. Antisaccades were always greatly facilitated following the engagement of spatial attention by symbolic cues (arrows) informing the subject where the upcoming saccade should be directed. Reflexive saccades showed little or no cueing effects and exhibited significant facilitation only when these cues were randomly intermixed with uncued trials. In addition, the present study tested the effects of fixation condition (gap, step, and overlap) on attentional modulation. Cueing effects did not vary due to fixation condition. Thus, voluntary spatial attention consistently showed different effects on voluntary and reflexive saccades, and there was no evidence in these studies that voluntary cues inhibit reflexive saccades, even in a gap paradigm.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.72
spellingShingle Stephanie K. Seidlits
Tammie Reza
Kevin A. Briand
Anne B. Sereno
Voluntary Spatial Attention has Different Effects on Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades
The Scientific World Journal
title Voluntary Spatial Attention has Different Effects on Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades
title_full Voluntary Spatial Attention has Different Effects on Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades
title_fullStr Voluntary Spatial Attention has Different Effects on Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades
title_full_unstemmed Voluntary Spatial Attention has Different Effects on Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades
title_short Voluntary Spatial Attention has Different Effects on Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades
title_sort voluntary spatial attention has different effects on voluntary and reflexive saccades
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2003.72
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniekseidlits voluntaryspatialattentionhasdifferenteffectsonvoluntaryandreflexivesaccades
AT tammiereza voluntaryspatialattentionhasdifferenteffectsonvoluntaryandreflexivesaccades
AT kevinabriand voluntaryspatialattentionhasdifferenteffectsonvoluntaryandreflexivesaccades
AT annebsereno voluntaryspatialattentionhasdifferenteffectsonvoluntaryandreflexivesaccades