To what theories of laws of nature B. Faul’s argument is applicable?
The derivative argument of the consequences is aimed at proving the incompatibility of certain theories of the laws of nature in conjunction with physicalism and the existence of moral responsibility. In this text, it is outlined the applicability of this argument to the most famous theories of t...
Saved in:
Main Author: | T. S. Demin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/69-71%20%D0%94%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%20%D0%A2.%20%D0%A1..pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
by: B. V. Faul
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Physicalism and moral responsibility: presentation of derivative consequence argument
by: B. V. Faul
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Deficit of conceivability: response to Bogdan Faul’s article «Minimal dualism and epistemic approach»
by: T. S. Demin
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Conditional analysis of free will and consequence argument
by: M. A. Sekatskaya
Published: (2020-12-01) -
L’argumentation et les descriptions définies
by: Kohei Kida
Published: (2019-12-01)