To what theories of laws of nature B. Faul’s argument is applicable?
The derivative argument of the consequences is aimed at proving the incompatibility of certain theories of the laws of nature in conjunction with physicalism and the existence of moral responsibility. In this text, it is outlined the applicability of this argument to the most famous theories of t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/69-71%20%D0%94%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%20%D0%A2.%20%D0%A1..pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The derivative argument of the consequences is aimed at proving the incompatibility
of certain theories of the laws of nature in conjunction with physicalism and the
existence of moral responsibility. In this text, it is outlined the applicability of this
argument to the most famous theories of the laws of nature. The argument can
only be directed to those theories that are pinched by realism regarding the laws
of nature. This text demonstrates that the most promising targets for the argument
are Armstrong’s theory as well as some of the nonreductive theories of the laws
of nature |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2542-0488 2541-7983 |