Comparison of the Visibility Grading Forecast Method Based on Meteorological Factors and Environmental Factors
The main visibility forecast factors were identified with the support of data from routine meteorological observations from the Mianyang Airport and the Mianyang Environmental Monitoring Station from 2015 to 2018, and a visibility grading forecast model was established and tested by dint of the mult...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Advances in Meteorology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5847787 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832546621835968512 |
|---|---|
| author | Yanyan Long Fei Li Wenjun Sang |
| author_facet | Yanyan Long Fei Li Wenjun Sang |
| author_sort | Yanyan Long |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The main visibility forecast factors were identified with the support of data from routine meteorological observations from the Mianyang Airport and the Mianyang Environmental Monitoring Station from 2015 to 2018, and a visibility grading forecast model was established and tested by dint of the multiple linear regression and the KNN algorithm based on big data mining technology, and the variation characteristics of visibility in winter at the Mianyang Airport were studied. The results showed that (1) in addition to having a significant positive correlation with wind speed, the visibility in winter at the Mianyang Airport has a significant negative correlation with relative humidity, dew point temperature, AQI, PM2.5 concentration, PM10 concentration, and CO, and it has the strongest correlation with relative humidity, and the correlation coefficient is −0.76. (2) The multivariate linear regression model and the KNN model were adopted for grading forecasting experiments on visibility, and the results revealed that both models could be used for visibility grading forecasts. The multiple regression model secures an accuracy of over 70% for forecasts of level 1–5 visibility. In terms of the KNN model, the forecast accuracy is the best when K = 3 or K = 5, notably for level-2, level-4, and level-5 visibility. The forecast accuracy rate is 100% for level-2 visibility, but the forecast for level-1 visibility is poor. (3) The minimum value of the average daily visibility of the Mianyang Airport in winter appeared at 09 : 00 and the maximum value appeared at 17 : 00. The level-1 visibility occurred and developed before 09 : 00 and faded and vanished between 08 : 00 and 15 : 00. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a91c30a400074e56ac3cc75ff3e4468b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-9317 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in Meteorology |
| spelling | doaj-art-a91c30a400074e56ac3cc75ff3e4468b2025-02-03T06:47:46ZengWileyAdvances in Meteorology1687-93172023-01-01202310.1155/2023/5847787Comparison of the Visibility Grading Forecast Method Based on Meteorological Factors and Environmental FactorsYanyan Long0Fei Li1Wenjun Sang2Civil Aviation Flight University of ChinaCivil Aviation Flight University of ChinaCivil Aviation Flight University of ChinaThe main visibility forecast factors were identified with the support of data from routine meteorological observations from the Mianyang Airport and the Mianyang Environmental Monitoring Station from 2015 to 2018, and a visibility grading forecast model was established and tested by dint of the multiple linear regression and the KNN algorithm based on big data mining technology, and the variation characteristics of visibility in winter at the Mianyang Airport were studied. The results showed that (1) in addition to having a significant positive correlation with wind speed, the visibility in winter at the Mianyang Airport has a significant negative correlation with relative humidity, dew point temperature, AQI, PM2.5 concentration, PM10 concentration, and CO, and it has the strongest correlation with relative humidity, and the correlation coefficient is −0.76. (2) The multivariate linear regression model and the KNN model were adopted for grading forecasting experiments on visibility, and the results revealed that both models could be used for visibility grading forecasts. The multiple regression model secures an accuracy of over 70% for forecasts of level 1–5 visibility. In terms of the KNN model, the forecast accuracy is the best when K = 3 or K = 5, notably for level-2, level-4, and level-5 visibility. The forecast accuracy rate is 100% for level-2 visibility, but the forecast for level-1 visibility is poor. (3) The minimum value of the average daily visibility of the Mianyang Airport in winter appeared at 09 : 00 and the maximum value appeared at 17 : 00. The level-1 visibility occurred and developed before 09 : 00 and faded and vanished between 08 : 00 and 15 : 00.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5847787 |
| spellingShingle | Yanyan Long Fei Li Wenjun Sang Comparison of the Visibility Grading Forecast Method Based on Meteorological Factors and Environmental Factors Advances in Meteorology |
| title | Comparison of the Visibility Grading Forecast Method Based on Meteorological Factors and Environmental Factors |
| title_full | Comparison of the Visibility Grading Forecast Method Based on Meteorological Factors and Environmental Factors |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the Visibility Grading Forecast Method Based on Meteorological Factors and Environmental Factors |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Visibility Grading Forecast Method Based on Meteorological Factors and Environmental Factors |
| title_short | Comparison of the Visibility Grading Forecast Method Based on Meteorological Factors and Environmental Factors |
| title_sort | comparison of the visibility grading forecast method based on meteorological factors and environmental factors |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5847787 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yanyanlong comparisonofthevisibilitygradingforecastmethodbasedonmeteorologicalfactorsandenvironmentalfactors AT feili comparisonofthevisibilitygradingforecastmethodbasedonmeteorologicalfactorsandenvironmentalfactors AT wenjunsang comparisonofthevisibilitygradingforecastmethodbasedonmeteorologicalfactorsandenvironmentalfactors |