The effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changes
Background and Study Aim. To compare the effects of three different sets method, which is frequently used in resistance training, on strength and hypertrophy values. Materials and Methods. Thirty-three young male athletes with similar daily activities and nutrient intakes at the Fitlife fitness c...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IP Iermakov S.S.
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Physical Education of Students |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://sportedu.org.ua/index.php/PES/article/view/1728 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850058484102463488 |
|---|---|
| author | Barbaros Demirtaş Onat Çetin Ergün Çakır Malik Beyleroğlu |
| author_facet | Barbaros Demirtaş Onat Çetin Ergün Çakır Malik Beyleroğlu |
| author_sort | Barbaros Demirtaş |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background and Study Aim. To compare the effects of three different sets method, which is frequently used in resistance training, on strength and hypertrophy values.
Materials and Methods. Thirty-three young male athletes with similar daily activities and nutrient intakes at the Fitlife fitness center in Sakarya were included in the study. Participants were randomly divided into three different groups as Modified German Volume Training (MGVT) (n=11, 21.5 ± 2.4 years), Super Set (SS) (n=11, 22.4 ± 2.9) and Giant Set (GS) (n=11, 23.0 ± 4.3 years). The study was started with a total of thirty-three people, but two participants in the Giant set group were excluded from the measurements because they left the study due to personal reasons. Strength, muscle thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements were made in the upper extremity muscles before and after the six-week training period.
Results. After six weeks of training, significant increases were observed in the cross-sectional area and thickness (p<0.05) of pectoralis major, deltoid, and latissimus dorsi muscle groups in all three groups, and in the strength parameter (p<0.05) in bench press, barbell row and shoulder press exercises. There was no difference in strength, muscle cross-sectional area and thickness parameters between the groups (p>0,05).
Conclusions. Modified German Volume Training (MGVT), Super Set (SS) and Giant Set (GS) methods reveal that there is no difference between the set methods in the 1 Repetition Maximum (1RM) strength and hypertrophy development of young male individuals who do not have a history of resistance exercise but have completed the adaptation period, and that there is an improvement in all set methods. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a7a9359f15e44b7e95dac0700a8cd8ce |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2308-7250 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | IP Iermakov S.S. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Physical Education of Students |
| spelling | doaj-art-a7a9359f15e44b7e95dac0700a8cd8ce2025-08-20T02:51:07ZengIP Iermakov S.S.Physical Education of Students2308-72502022-11-0126627027910.15561/20755279.2022.06011728The effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changesBarbaros Demirtaş0Onat Çetin1Ergün Çakır2Malik Beyleroğlu3Sakarya University of Applied SciencesYalova UniversityVan Yüzüncü Yıl UniversitySakarya University of Applied SciencesBackground and Study Aim. To compare the effects of three different sets method, which is frequently used in resistance training, on strength and hypertrophy values. Materials and Methods. Thirty-three young male athletes with similar daily activities and nutrient intakes at the Fitlife fitness center in Sakarya were included in the study. Participants were randomly divided into three different groups as Modified German Volume Training (MGVT) (n=11, 21.5 ± 2.4 years), Super Set (SS) (n=11, 22.4 ± 2.9) and Giant Set (GS) (n=11, 23.0 ± 4.3 years). The study was started with a total of thirty-three people, but two participants in the Giant set group were excluded from the measurements because they left the study due to personal reasons. Strength, muscle thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements were made in the upper extremity muscles before and after the six-week training period. Results. After six weeks of training, significant increases were observed in the cross-sectional area and thickness (p<0.05) of pectoralis major, deltoid, and latissimus dorsi muscle groups in all three groups, and in the strength parameter (p<0.05) in bench press, barbell row and shoulder press exercises. There was no difference in strength, muscle cross-sectional area and thickness parameters between the groups (p>0,05). Conclusions. Modified German Volume Training (MGVT), Super Set (SS) and Giant Set (GS) methods reveal that there is no difference between the set methods in the 1 Repetition Maximum (1RM) strength and hypertrophy development of young male individuals who do not have a history of resistance exercise but have completed the adaptation period, and that there is an improvement in all set methods.https://sportedu.org.ua/index.php/PES/article/view/1728muscle hypertrophystrengthmuscle thicknesscross-sectional area |
| spellingShingle | Barbaros Demirtaş Onat Çetin Ergün Çakır Malik Beyleroğlu The effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changes Physical Education of Students muscle hypertrophy strength muscle thickness cross-sectional area |
| title | The effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changes |
| title_full | The effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changes |
| title_fullStr | The effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changes |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changes |
| title_short | The effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changes |
| title_sort | effect of three different sets method used in resistance training on hypertrophy and maximal strength changes |
| topic | muscle hypertrophy strength muscle thickness cross-sectional area |
| url | https://sportedu.org.ua/index.php/PES/article/view/1728 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT barbarosdemirtas theeffectofthreedifferentsetsmethodusedinresistancetrainingonhypertrophyandmaximalstrengthchanges AT onatcetin theeffectofthreedifferentsetsmethodusedinresistancetrainingonhypertrophyandmaximalstrengthchanges AT erguncakır theeffectofthreedifferentsetsmethodusedinresistancetrainingonhypertrophyandmaximalstrengthchanges AT malikbeyleroglu theeffectofthreedifferentsetsmethodusedinresistancetrainingonhypertrophyandmaximalstrengthchanges AT barbarosdemirtas effectofthreedifferentsetsmethodusedinresistancetrainingonhypertrophyandmaximalstrengthchanges AT onatcetin effectofthreedifferentsetsmethodusedinresistancetrainingonhypertrophyandmaximalstrengthchanges AT erguncakır effectofthreedifferentsetsmethodusedinresistancetrainingonhypertrophyandmaximalstrengthchanges AT malikbeyleroglu effectofthreedifferentsetsmethodusedinresistancetrainingonhypertrophyandmaximalstrengthchanges |