Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review

Objectives To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED).Design Scoping review.Methods Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency medici...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guillaume Martel, Andrew Petrosoniak, Marcel Émond, Jennifer Truchot, Valérie Boucher, Éliane Raymond-Dufresne, Winny Li, Eva Jouhair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e059442.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576637235888128
author Guillaume Martel
Andrew Petrosoniak
Marcel Émond
Jennifer Truchot
Valérie Boucher
Éliane Raymond-Dufresne
Winny Li
Eva Jouhair
author_facet Guillaume Martel
Andrew Petrosoniak
Marcel Émond
Jennifer Truchot
Valérie Boucher
Éliane Raymond-Dufresne
Winny Li
Eva Jouhair
author_sort Guillaume Martel
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED).Design Scoping review.Methods Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency medicine.Information sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science.Results A total of 4077 records were identified by our search strategy and 2476 abstracts were screened. One hundred and thirty full articles were reviewed and 81 full articles were included. Only 33 studies (40%) assessed safety-related issues, among which 11 chose a safety-related primary outcome. Latent safety threats (LSTs) assessment was conducted in 24 studies (30%) and the cancellation rate was described in 9 studies (11%). The possible negative impact of ISS on real ED patients was assessed in two studies (2.5%), through a questionnaire and not through patient outcomes.Conclusion Most studies use ISS for systems-based or education-based applications. Patient safety during ISS is often evaluated in the context of identifying or mitigating LSTs and rarely on the potential impact and risks to patients simultaneously receiving care in the ED. Our scoping review identified knowledge gaps related to the safe conduct of ISS in the ED, which may warrant further investigation.
format Article
id doaj-art-a6e0b952bd364a52b56a9bf54b355012
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-a6e0b952bd364a52b56a9bf54b3550122025-01-31T01:25:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-07-0112710.1136/bmjopen-2021-059442Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping reviewGuillaume Martel0Andrew Petrosoniak1Marcel Émond2Jennifer Truchot3Valérie Boucher4Éliane Raymond-Dufresne5Winny Li6Eva Jouhair7Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Michael`s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaVITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, Québec, CanadaEmergency Department, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada2 Axe de recherche en Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval Research Center, Quebec, Quebec, CanadaEmergency Department, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Québec, Canada5Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDépartement de médecine familiale et de médecine d`urgence, Université Laval Faculté de médecine, Quebec, Quebec, CanadaObjectives To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED).Design Scoping review.Methods Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency medicine.Information sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science.Results A total of 4077 records were identified by our search strategy and 2476 abstracts were screened. One hundred and thirty full articles were reviewed and 81 full articles were included. Only 33 studies (40%) assessed safety-related issues, among which 11 chose a safety-related primary outcome. Latent safety threats (LSTs) assessment was conducted in 24 studies (30%) and the cancellation rate was described in 9 studies (11%). The possible negative impact of ISS on real ED patients was assessed in two studies (2.5%), through a questionnaire and not through patient outcomes.Conclusion Most studies use ISS for systems-based or education-based applications. Patient safety during ISS is often evaluated in the context of identifying or mitigating LSTs and rarely on the potential impact and risks to patients simultaneously receiving care in the ED. Our scoping review identified knowledge gaps related to the safe conduct of ISS in the ED, which may warrant further investigation.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e059442.full
spellingShingle Guillaume Martel
Andrew Petrosoniak
Marcel Émond
Jennifer Truchot
Valérie Boucher
Éliane Raymond-Dufresne
Winny Li
Eva Jouhair
Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
BMJ Open
title Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_full Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_fullStr Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_short Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_sort is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe a scoping review
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e059442.full
work_keys_str_mv AT guillaumemartel isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT andrewpetrosoniak isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT marcelemond isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT jennifertruchot isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT valerieboucher isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT elianeraymonddufresne isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT winnyli isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT evajouhair isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview