Modeling and analysis of entropy in MHD unsteady flow of water-based nanofluids with carbon nanoparticles

Abstract This study explores the entropy generation characteristics in the flow of nanofluids over an unsteady stretching surface under the combined effects of magnetic field and suction/injection. The primary objective is to investigate that three different carbon-based nanoparticles Graphene, nano...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijendra Kumar Jarwal, Sushila Choudhary, Kalpna Sharma, Prasun Choudhary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2025-07-01
Series:Discover Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07256-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract This study explores the entropy generation characteristics in the flow of nanofluids over an unsteady stretching surface under the combined effects of magnetic field and suction/injection. The primary objective is to investigate that three different carbon-based nanoparticles Graphene, nano-diamond, and single-walled carbon nanotubes, dispersed in a water-based fluid, influence thermal performance and entropy production in magnetohydrodynamic flow scenarios. This work presents a novel comparison of high-conductivity nanofluids for precise thermal regulation applications. The flow governing partial differential equations, describing the unsteady nanofluid flow and heat transfer, are reduced to a system of ordinary differential equations through similarity transformations. These ODEs are numerically solved using MATLAB's built-in bvp4c solver. An increase in the magnetic parameter from $$M = 0$$ M = 0 to $$M = 3$$ M = 3 leads to a significant reduction in the momentum profiles from $$f^{\prime}\left( {\eta = 1} \right) = 0.38101$$ f ′ η = 1 = 0.38101 for graphene nanofluid to $$f^{\prime}\left( {\eta = 1} \right) = 0.10741$$ f ′ η = 1 = 0.10741 for nanodiamond fluid. Similarly, enhancing the injection parameter than a rise in velocity is noticed from $$f^{\prime}\left( {\eta = 1} \right) = 0.26662$$ f ′ η = 1 = 0.26662 (nanodiamond fluid) to $$f^{\prime}\left( {\eta = 1} \right) = 0.42372$$ f ′ η = 1 = 0.42372 (SWCNT-based nanofluid). Furthermore, an improvement in nanoparticle volume fraction $$\left( {0.05 \le \phi \le 0.10} \right)$$ 0.05 ≤ ϕ ≤ 0.10 augments the thermal boundary layer, with the wall temperature rising from $$\theta \left( {\eta = 1} \right) = 0.13774$$ θ η = 1 = 0.13774 for graphene nanofluid to $$\theta \left( {\eta = 1} \right) = 0.21466$$ θ η = 1 = 0.21466 for SWCNT-based nanofluid. The results highlight the potential of nanoparticle-enhanced fluids and magnetic/injection control for optimizing heat and momentum transfer in advanced cooling, biomedical, and microfluidic systems. These findings support applications in electronics cooling, targeted drug delivery, and energy storage technologies.
ISSN:3004-9261