Repair of Ceramic Ware in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (case study of the extreme North-East of Europe)

The paper deals with the regional data on the repair of ceramic wares in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (VI–III millennia BC). Holes of various types at the edges of cracks on the broken pot or cracks that threatened its safety, as well as the remains of adhesive materials that sealed the repair seam,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Viktor N. Karmanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: State institution «Tatarstan Аcademy of Sciences» 2024-08-01
Series:Археология евразийских степей
Subjects:
Online Access:https://evrazstep.ru/index.php/aes/article/view/1354
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832586468956045312
author Viktor N. Karmanov
author_facet Viktor N. Karmanov
author_sort Viktor N. Karmanov
collection DOAJ
description The paper deals with the regional data on the repair of ceramic wares in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (VI–III millennia BC). Holes of various types at the edges of cracks on the broken pot or cracks that threatened its safety, as well as the remains of adhesive materials that sealed the repair seam, are evidence of ancient repairs of pots. As a result, it was determined that the oldest evidence of ware repair in the region is associated with early pottery (VI millennium BC). The need for pottery repair increases by the final Neolithic (second half of the IV millennium BC) and decreases in the Eneolithic (III millennium BC). The use of organic clamps and sealants is also uneven in diachrony. The use of adhesive materials is not revealed in Early Neolithic assemblages, on the contrary, it increases by the Final Neolithic, and in the Eneolithic it may be the only method of repair. Five samples of sealants from the Final Neolithic–Eneolithic Chuzhyael culture were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. It was found that the adhesive materials were tar obtained by the “double pot” method – heating the raw material in one pot while pouring the product into another container. The informative potential of the studied category of sources is determined by the complex of actions, tools and materials involved in pottery repair. Like any evidentially reconstructed artefact “biography”, pottery “history” can tell us about behavior of people and assess their needs and lifestyles.
format Article
id doaj-art-a62b858501604593bf2498ef197a77bc
institution Kabale University
issn 2587-6112
2618-9488
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher State institution «Tatarstan Аcademy of Sciences»
record_format Article
series Археология евразийских степей
spelling doaj-art-a62b858501604593bf2498ef197a77bc2025-01-25T12:25:09ZengState institution «Tatarstan Аcademy of Sciences»Археология евразийских степей2587-61122618-94882024-08-01422824010.24852/2587-6112.2024.4.228.240Repair of Ceramic Ware in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (case study of the extreme North-East of Europe)Viktor N. Karmanov0Institute of Language, Literature and History of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Kommunisticheskaya St., Syktyvkar, 167982, Russian FederationThe paper deals with the regional data on the repair of ceramic wares in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (VI–III millennia BC). Holes of various types at the edges of cracks on the broken pot or cracks that threatened its safety, as well as the remains of adhesive materials that sealed the repair seam, are evidence of ancient repairs of pots. As a result, it was determined that the oldest evidence of ware repair in the region is associated with early pottery (VI millennium BC). The need for pottery repair increases by the final Neolithic (second half of the IV millennium BC) and decreases in the Eneolithic (III millennium BC). The use of organic clamps and sealants is also uneven in diachrony. The use of adhesive materials is not revealed in Early Neolithic assemblages, on the contrary, it increases by the Final Neolithic, and in the Eneolithic it may be the only method of repair. Five samples of sealants from the Final Neolithic–Eneolithic Chuzhyael culture were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. It was found that the adhesive materials were tar obtained by the “double pot” method – heating the raw material in one pot while pouring the product into another container. The informative potential of the studied category of sources is determined by the complex of actions, tools and materials involved in pottery repair. Like any evidentially reconstructed artefact “biography”, pottery “history” can tell us about behavior of people and assess their needs and lifestyles.https://evrazstep.ru/index.php/aes/article/view/1354archaeologyneolithiceneolithicancient potteryceramicsrepairdrillingadhesive materialsealanttar
spellingShingle Viktor N. Karmanov
Repair of Ceramic Ware in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (case study of the extreme North-East of Europe)
Археология евразийских степей
archaeology
neolithic
eneolithic
ancient pottery
ceramics
repair
drilling
adhesive material
sealant
tar
title Repair of Ceramic Ware in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (case study of the extreme North-East of Europe)
title_full Repair of Ceramic Ware in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (case study of the extreme North-East of Europe)
title_fullStr Repair of Ceramic Ware in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (case study of the extreme North-East of Europe)
title_full_unstemmed Repair of Ceramic Ware in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (case study of the extreme North-East of Europe)
title_short Repair of Ceramic Ware in the Neolithic and Eneolithic (case study of the extreme North-East of Europe)
title_sort repair of ceramic ware in the neolithic and eneolithic case study of the extreme north east of europe
topic archaeology
neolithic
eneolithic
ancient pottery
ceramics
repair
drilling
adhesive material
sealant
tar
url https://evrazstep.ru/index.php/aes/article/view/1354
work_keys_str_mv AT viktornkarmanov repairofceramicwareintheneolithicandeneolithiccasestudyoftheextremenortheastofeurope