Comparison and Estimation of Surface Albedo of Various Levels of Land use by SEBAL and METRIC Methods

Using Landsat satellite images taken in 2015/08/10 and also SEBAL and metric methods, surface albedo amounts for various land uses in the northern half of the Ardabil province was estimated. ENVI4.8 and ArcGIS10.3 softwares were also used. To determine the type of usage of different levels, the maxi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehdi Asadi, Khalil Valizadeh khamran, Mohammad Baaghdeh, Hamed Adab
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Kharazmi University 2020-12-01
Series:تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3291-en.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575738715308032
author Mehdi Asadi
Khalil Valizadeh khamran
Mohammad Baaghdeh
Hamed Adab
author_facet Mehdi Asadi
Khalil Valizadeh khamran
Mohammad Baaghdeh
Hamed Adab
author_sort Mehdi Asadi
collection DOAJ
description Using Landsat satellite images taken in 2015/08/10 and also SEBAL and metric methods, surface albedo amounts for various land uses in the northern half of the Ardabil province was estimated. ENVI4.8 and ArcGIS10.3 softwares were also used. To determine the type of usage of different levels, the maximum likelihood algorithm classification method was used with Kappa coefficient of 86.14% and overall accuracy of 92.63%. The results indicated that the water levels with the mean value of 0.93 and 0.414, respectively, had the least amount of albedo in SEBAL and METRIC methods. Also, based on the results obtained from SEBAL and METRIC methods the city albedo is about 0.313 and 0.278 respectively.  These values are the highest levels of albedo among Land use levels. In this study, the amount of albedo in rangelands was determined to be between 0.183 to 0.266 in the SEBAL method and between 0.237 and 0.265 in METRIC method. The amount of albedo was also examined in agricultural (0.240 based on SEBAL method and 0.247 based on METRIC method) and forest lands (0.149 based on SEBAL method and 0.225 based on METRIC method). Finally, according to the results of Albedo values based on SEBAL and METRIC methods, it was concluded that due to the difference in net energy received at different levels, it is possible to estimate the level of albedo levels, which is very effective in estimating evapotranspiration by remote sensing methods.
format Article
id doaj-art-a5926293ccb847f09a3a08cdc3c59c7e
institution Kabale University
issn 2228-7736
2588-5138
language fas
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Kharazmi University
record_format Article
series تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی
spelling doaj-art-a5926293ccb847f09a3a08cdc3c59c7e2025-01-31T17:27:26ZfasKharazmi Universityتحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی2228-77362588-51382020-12-012059157171Comparison and Estimation of Surface Albedo of Various Levels of Land use by SEBAL and METRIC MethodsMehdi Asadi0Khalil Valizadeh khamran1Mohammad Baaghdeh2Hamed Adab3 Mehdi Asadi: Ph.D. Student, Agricultural Climatology, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran Khalil, Valizadeh Kamran: Associate Professor, Department of Remote Sensing, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran Mohammad baaghideh, Associate Professor of Climatology, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran Hamed, Adab: Assistant Professor of Climatology, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran Using Landsat satellite images taken in 2015/08/10 and also SEBAL and metric methods, surface albedo amounts for various land uses in the northern half of the Ardabil province was estimated. ENVI4.8 and ArcGIS10.3 softwares were also used. To determine the type of usage of different levels, the maximum likelihood algorithm classification method was used with Kappa coefficient of 86.14% and overall accuracy of 92.63%. The results indicated that the water levels with the mean value of 0.93 and 0.414, respectively, had the least amount of albedo in SEBAL and METRIC methods. Also, based on the results obtained from SEBAL and METRIC methods the city albedo is about 0.313 and 0.278 respectively.  These values are the highest levels of albedo among Land use levels. In this study, the amount of albedo in rangelands was determined to be between 0.183 to 0.266 in the SEBAL method and between 0.237 and 0.265 in METRIC method. The amount of albedo was also examined in agricultural (0.240 based on SEBAL method and 0.247 based on METRIC method) and forest lands (0.149 based on SEBAL method and 0.225 based on METRIC method). Finally, according to the results of Albedo values based on SEBAL and METRIC methods, it was concluded that due to the difference in net energy received at different levels, it is possible to estimate the level of albedo levels, which is very effective in estimating evapotranspiration by remote sensing methods.http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3291-en.pdfalbedosebalmetricremote sensingardabil.
spellingShingle Mehdi Asadi
Khalil Valizadeh khamran
Mohammad Baaghdeh
Hamed Adab
Comparison and Estimation of Surface Albedo of Various Levels of Land use by SEBAL and METRIC Methods
تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی
albedo
sebal
metric
remote sensing
ardabil.
title Comparison and Estimation of Surface Albedo of Various Levels of Land use by SEBAL and METRIC Methods
title_full Comparison and Estimation of Surface Albedo of Various Levels of Land use by SEBAL and METRIC Methods
title_fullStr Comparison and Estimation of Surface Albedo of Various Levels of Land use by SEBAL and METRIC Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Estimation of Surface Albedo of Various Levels of Land use by SEBAL and METRIC Methods
title_short Comparison and Estimation of Surface Albedo of Various Levels of Land use by SEBAL and METRIC Methods
title_sort comparison and estimation of surface albedo of various levels of land use by sebal and metric methods
topic albedo
sebal
metric
remote sensing
ardabil.
url http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3291-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdiasadi comparisonandestimationofsurfacealbedoofvariouslevelsoflandusebysebalandmetricmethods
AT khalilvalizadehkhamran comparisonandestimationofsurfacealbedoofvariouslevelsoflandusebysebalandmetricmethods
AT mohammadbaaghdeh comparisonandestimationofsurfacealbedoofvariouslevelsoflandusebysebalandmetricmethods
AT hamedadab comparisonandestimationofsurfacealbedoofvariouslevelsoflandusebysebalandmetricmethods