Potential Extensions of the US FRAX Algorithm

To determine if the revised US FRAX can identify those at high risk for fractures at any skeletal site, we studied 250 women and 249 men ≥40 years old from an age-stratified random sample of Rochester, MN residents. At baseline, femoral neck (FN) bone density was assessed, as were the clinical risk...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Joseph Melton, Elizabeth J. Atkinson, Sara J. Achenbach, John A. Kanis, Terry M. Therneau, Helena Johansson, Sundeep Khosla, Shreyasee Amin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Osteoporosis
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/528790
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551479378968576
author L. Joseph Melton
Elizabeth J. Atkinson
Sara J. Achenbach
John A. Kanis
Terry M. Therneau
Helena Johansson
Sundeep Khosla
Shreyasee Amin
author_facet L. Joseph Melton
Elizabeth J. Atkinson
Sara J. Achenbach
John A. Kanis
Terry M. Therneau
Helena Johansson
Sundeep Khosla
Shreyasee Amin
author_sort L. Joseph Melton
collection DOAJ
description To determine if the revised US FRAX can identify those at high risk for fractures at any skeletal site, we studied 250 women and 249 men ≥40 years old from an age-stratified random sample of Rochester, MN residents. At baseline, femoral neck (FN) bone density was assessed, as were the clinical risk factors included in FRAX, along with additional fracture risk factors such as bone turnover markers and fall history. Fracture ascertainment through periodic interviews and comprehensive medical record review was performed over 10 years of followup. In both women and men, a higher FRAX probability at baseline was associated with greater subsequent likelihood of a major osteoporotic fracture. However, a relative 10% increase in the FRAX 10-year fracture probability was also associated with a 1.4-fold increase (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–1.7) in other fractures in women and a 1.7-fold increase (95% CI 0.8–3.1) in men. Furthermore, FRAX predicted asymptomatic vertebral fractures and fractures generally in both sexes. The addition of risk factors not currently included in FRAX did not appear to improve the accuracy of fracture risk prediction. FRAX may provide a conservative estimate of risk for major osteoporotic fractures, but it also predicts fractures generally.
format Article
id doaj-art-a5854972b9b249d68fe042124ab75c4b
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8059
2042-0064
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Osteoporosis
spelling doaj-art-a5854972b9b249d68fe042124ab75c4b2025-02-03T06:01:21ZengWileyJournal of Osteoporosis2090-80592042-00642012-01-01201210.1155/2012/528790528790Potential Extensions of the US FRAX AlgorithmL. Joseph Melton0Elizabeth J. Atkinson1Sara J. Achenbach2John A. Kanis3Terry M. Therneau4Helena Johansson5Sundeep Khosla6Shreyasee Amin7Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USADivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USADivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USAWHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, UKDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USAWHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, UKDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USADivision of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USATo determine if the revised US FRAX can identify those at high risk for fractures at any skeletal site, we studied 250 women and 249 men ≥40 years old from an age-stratified random sample of Rochester, MN residents. At baseline, femoral neck (FN) bone density was assessed, as were the clinical risk factors included in FRAX, along with additional fracture risk factors such as bone turnover markers and fall history. Fracture ascertainment through periodic interviews and comprehensive medical record review was performed over 10 years of followup. In both women and men, a higher FRAX probability at baseline was associated with greater subsequent likelihood of a major osteoporotic fracture. However, a relative 10% increase in the FRAX 10-year fracture probability was also associated with a 1.4-fold increase (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–1.7) in other fractures in women and a 1.7-fold increase (95% CI 0.8–3.1) in men. Furthermore, FRAX predicted asymptomatic vertebral fractures and fractures generally in both sexes. The addition of risk factors not currently included in FRAX did not appear to improve the accuracy of fracture risk prediction. FRAX may provide a conservative estimate of risk for major osteoporotic fractures, but it also predicts fractures generally.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/528790
spellingShingle L. Joseph Melton
Elizabeth J. Atkinson
Sara J. Achenbach
John A. Kanis
Terry M. Therneau
Helena Johansson
Sundeep Khosla
Shreyasee Amin
Potential Extensions of the US FRAX Algorithm
Journal of Osteoporosis
title Potential Extensions of the US FRAX Algorithm
title_full Potential Extensions of the US FRAX Algorithm
title_fullStr Potential Extensions of the US FRAX Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Potential Extensions of the US FRAX Algorithm
title_short Potential Extensions of the US FRAX Algorithm
title_sort potential extensions of the us frax algorithm
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/528790
work_keys_str_mv AT ljosephmelton potentialextensionsoftheusfraxalgorithm
AT elizabethjatkinson potentialextensionsoftheusfraxalgorithm
AT sarajachenbach potentialextensionsoftheusfraxalgorithm
AT johnakanis potentialextensionsoftheusfraxalgorithm
AT terrymtherneau potentialextensionsoftheusfraxalgorithm
AT helenajohansson potentialextensionsoftheusfraxalgorithm
AT sundeepkhosla potentialextensionsoftheusfraxalgorithm
AT shreyaseeamin potentialextensionsoftheusfraxalgorithm