Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments

Background Despite wide adoption in the healthcare of safety event report (SER) systems, there is a paucity of unified structures for prompt analysis and action while retaining reporter confidentiality. We used a synesis framework to change siloed reviews of safety reports to a comprehensive apprais...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamie Cargill, Aarti Bavare, Tiffany Wrenn, Anne Lam, Lauren Salinas, Itode Idowu, Asma Razavi, Venessa Lynn Pinto, Eric Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-01-01
Series:BMJ Open Quality
Online Access:https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e002880.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542672529653760
author Jamie Cargill
Aarti Bavare
Tiffany Wrenn
Anne Lam
Lauren Salinas
Itode Idowu
Asma Razavi
Venessa Lynn Pinto
Eric Williams
author_facet Jamie Cargill
Aarti Bavare
Tiffany Wrenn
Anne Lam
Lauren Salinas
Itode Idowu
Asma Razavi
Venessa Lynn Pinto
Eric Williams
author_sort Jamie Cargill
collection DOAJ
description Background Despite wide adoption in the healthcare of safety event report (SER) systems, there is a paucity of unified structures for prompt analysis and action while retaining reporter confidentiality. We used a synesis framework to change siloed reviews of safety reports to a comprehensive appraisal of quality, safety, productivity and reliability to facilitate interventions.Methods After a needs assessment survey, we launched serial plan-do-study-act cycles to (1) enhance teams’ ability to access SERs, (2) facilitate regular multidisciplinary review of SERs to identify actionable opportunities, (3) allocate action priority using failure mode and effects analysis, and (4) launch actions and summarise data. Team of Teams model allowed for empowered execution. Measures included process—completion of review, team engagement, proportion of ‘open’ (those without action plan) reports within 1 month of filing; outcome—number of actions launched and completed, dissemination of actions and postintervention survey results; and balancing—resources invested.Results 26 multidisciplinary leaders reviewed 3175 of the 3406 total reported SERs across four clinical units over 18 months. The proportion of reviewed to total SERs increased significantly from the first 6 months (75%) to the second 12 months (99%) (p<0.001), and the proportion of ‘open’ to reviewed SERs decreased significantly from 43% to 5.3% (p<0.001). Many local- and organisational-level actions were launched efficiently by the engaged and aligned team. Action impact was assessed by reviewing trends in SER themes and findings, and actions and impact were disseminated at unit, divisional and organisational levels. Postintervention survey showed improvement in leaders’ perceptions about SER reviews.Summary We successfully implemented a sustainable process to comprehensively review, prioritise and act on SERs in our large institution and facilitated safety interventions using a synesis framework.
format Article
id doaj-art-a548aad33f3f4cb1a919786259168991
institution Kabale University
issn 2399-6641
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Quality
spelling doaj-art-a548aad33f3f4cb1a9197862591689912025-02-03T19:00:13ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412025-01-0114110.1136/bmjoq-2024-002880Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environmentsJamie Cargill0Aarti Bavare1Tiffany Wrenn2Anne Lam3Lauren Salinas4Itode Idowu5Asma Razavi6Venessa Lynn Pinto7Eric Williams8Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USAPatient Safety, Texas Children`s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USAQuality and Patient Safety, Texas Children`s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care, Texas Children`s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USAPharmacy, Texas Children`s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care, Cincinnati Children`s, Cincinnati, Ohio, USABackground Despite wide adoption in the healthcare of safety event report (SER) systems, there is a paucity of unified structures for prompt analysis and action while retaining reporter confidentiality. We used a synesis framework to change siloed reviews of safety reports to a comprehensive appraisal of quality, safety, productivity and reliability to facilitate interventions.Methods After a needs assessment survey, we launched serial plan-do-study-act cycles to (1) enhance teams’ ability to access SERs, (2) facilitate regular multidisciplinary review of SERs to identify actionable opportunities, (3) allocate action priority using failure mode and effects analysis, and (4) launch actions and summarise data. Team of Teams model allowed for empowered execution. Measures included process—completion of review, team engagement, proportion of ‘open’ (those without action plan) reports within 1 month of filing; outcome—number of actions launched and completed, dissemination of actions and postintervention survey results; and balancing—resources invested.Results 26 multidisciplinary leaders reviewed 3175 of the 3406 total reported SERs across four clinical units over 18 months. The proportion of reviewed to total SERs increased significantly from the first 6 months (75%) to the second 12 months (99%) (p<0.001), and the proportion of ‘open’ to reviewed SERs decreased significantly from 43% to 5.3% (p<0.001). Many local- and organisational-level actions were launched efficiently by the engaged and aligned team. Action impact was assessed by reviewing trends in SER themes and findings, and actions and impact were disseminated at unit, divisional and organisational levels. Postintervention survey showed improvement in leaders’ perceptions about SER reviews.Summary We successfully implemented a sustainable process to comprehensively review, prioritise and act on SERs in our large institution and facilitated safety interventions using a synesis framework.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e002880.full
spellingShingle Jamie Cargill
Aarti Bavare
Tiffany Wrenn
Anne Lam
Lauren Salinas
Itode Idowu
Asma Razavi
Venessa Lynn Pinto
Eric Williams
Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments
BMJ Open Quality
title Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments
title_full Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments
title_fullStr Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments
title_full_unstemmed Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments
title_short Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments
title_sort synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments
url https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e002880.full
work_keys_str_mv AT jamiecargill synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments
AT aartibavare synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments
AT tiffanywrenn synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments
AT annelam synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments
AT laurensalinas synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments
AT itodeidowu synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments
AT asmarazavi synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments
AT venessalynnpinto synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments
AT ericwilliams synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments