Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments
Background Despite wide adoption in the healthcare of safety event report (SER) systems, there is a paucity of unified structures for prompt analysis and action while retaining reporter confidentiality. We used a synesis framework to change siloed reviews of safety reports to a comprehensive apprais...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2025-01-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open Quality |
Online Access: | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e002880.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832542672529653760 |
---|---|
author | Jamie Cargill Aarti Bavare Tiffany Wrenn Anne Lam Lauren Salinas Itode Idowu Asma Razavi Venessa Lynn Pinto Eric Williams |
author_facet | Jamie Cargill Aarti Bavare Tiffany Wrenn Anne Lam Lauren Salinas Itode Idowu Asma Razavi Venessa Lynn Pinto Eric Williams |
author_sort | Jamie Cargill |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background Despite wide adoption in the healthcare of safety event report (SER) systems, there is a paucity of unified structures for prompt analysis and action while retaining reporter confidentiality. We used a synesis framework to change siloed reviews of safety reports to a comprehensive appraisal of quality, safety, productivity and reliability to facilitate interventions.Methods After a needs assessment survey, we launched serial plan-do-study-act cycles to (1) enhance teams’ ability to access SERs, (2) facilitate regular multidisciplinary review of SERs to identify actionable opportunities, (3) allocate action priority using failure mode and effects analysis, and (4) launch actions and summarise data. Team of Teams model allowed for empowered execution. Measures included process—completion of review, team engagement, proportion of ‘open’ (those without action plan) reports within 1 month of filing; outcome—number of actions launched and completed, dissemination of actions and postintervention survey results; and balancing—resources invested.Results 26 multidisciplinary leaders reviewed 3175 of the 3406 total reported SERs across four clinical units over 18 months. The proportion of reviewed to total SERs increased significantly from the first 6 months (75%) to the second 12 months (99%) (p<0.001), and the proportion of ‘open’ to reviewed SERs decreased significantly from 43% to 5.3% (p<0.001). Many local- and organisational-level actions were launched efficiently by the engaged and aligned team. Action impact was assessed by reviewing trends in SER themes and findings, and actions and impact were disseminated at unit, divisional and organisational levels. Postintervention survey showed improvement in leaders’ perceptions about SER reviews.Summary We successfully implemented a sustainable process to comprehensively review, prioritise and act on SERs in our large institution and facilitated safety interventions using a synesis framework. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-a548aad33f3f4cb1a919786259168991 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2399-6641 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | Article |
series | BMJ Open Quality |
spelling | doaj-art-a548aad33f3f4cb1a9197862591689912025-02-03T19:00:13ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412025-01-0114110.1136/bmjoq-2024-002880Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environmentsJamie Cargill0Aarti Bavare1Tiffany Wrenn2Anne Lam3Lauren Salinas4Itode Idowu5Asma Razavi6Venessa Lynn Pinto7Eric Williams8Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USAPatient Safety, Texas Children`s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USAQuality and Patient Safety, Texas Children`s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care, Texas Children`s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USAPharmacy, Texas Children`s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USACritical Care, Cincinnati Children`s, Cincinnati, Ohio, USABackground Despite wide adoption in the healthcare of safety event report (SER) systems, there is a paucity of unified structures for prompt analysis and action while retaining reporter confidentiality. We used a synesis framework to change siloed reviews of safety reports to a comprehensive appraisal of quality, safety, productivity and reliability to facilitate interventions.Methods After a needs assessment survey, we launched serial plan-do-study-act cycles to (1) enhance teams’ ability to access SERs, (2) facilitate regular multidisciplinary review of SERs to identify actionable opportunities, (3) allocate action priority using failure mode and effects analysis, and (4) launch actions and summarise data. Team of Teams model allowed for empowered execution. Measures included process—completion of review, team engagement, proportion of ‘open’ (those without action plan) reports within 1 month of filing; outcome—number of actions launched and completed, dissemination of actions and postintervention survey results; and balancing—resources invested.Results 26 multidisciplinary leaders reviewed 3175 of the 3406 total reported SERs across four clinical units over 18 months. The proportion of reviewed to total SERs increased significantly from the first 6 months (75%) to the second 12 months (99%) (p<0.001), and the proportion of ‘open’ to reviewed SERs decreased significantly from 43% to 5.3% (p<0.001). Many local- and organisational-level actions were launched efficiently by the engaged and aligned team. Action impact was assessed by reviewing trends in SER themes and findings, and actions and impact were disseminated at unit, divisional and organisational levels. Postintervention survey showed improvement in leaders’ perceptions about SER reviews.Summary We successfully implemented a sustainable process to comprehensively review, prioritise and act on SERs in our large institution and facilitated safety interventions using a synesis framework.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e002880.full |
spellingShingle | Jamie Cargill Aarti Bavare Tiffany Wrenn Anne Lam Lauren Salinas Itode Idowu Asma Razavi Venessa Lynn Pinto Eric Williams Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments BMJ Open Quality |
title | Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments |
title_full | Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments |
title_fullStr | Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments |
title_full_unstemmed | Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments |
title_short | Synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments |
title_sort | synesis as a framework to enable safety interventions in complex healthcare environments |
url | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/14/1/e002880.full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamiecargill synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments AT aartibavare synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments AT tiffanywrenn synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments AT annelam synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments AT laurensalinas synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments AT itodeidowu synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments AT asmarazavi synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments AT venessalynnpinto synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments AT ericwilliams synesisasaframeworktoenablesafetyinterventionsincomplexhealthcareenvironments |