360 Using machine learning to analyze voice and detect aspiration
Objectives/Goals: Aspiration causes or aggravates lung diseases. While bedside swallow evaluations are not sensitive/specific, gold standard tests for aspiration are invasive, uncomfortable, expose patients to radiation, and are resource intensive. We propose the development and validation of an AI...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124009865/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Objectives/Goals: Aspiration causes or aggravates lung diseases. While bedside swallow evaluations are not sensitive/specific, gold standard tests for aspiration are invasive, uncomfortable, expose patients to radiation, and are resource intensive. We propose the development and validation of an AI model that analyzes voice to noninvasively predict aspiration. Methods/Study Population: Retrospectively recorded [i] phonations from 163 unique ENT patients were analyzed for acoustic features including jitter, shimmer, harmonic to noise ratio (HNR), etc. Patients were classified into three groups: aspirators (Penetration-Aspiration Scale, PAS 6–8), probable (PAS 3–5), and non-aspirators (PAS 1–2) based on video fluoroscopic swallow (VFSS) findings. Multivariate analysis evaluated patient demographics, history of head and neck surgery, radiation, neurological illness, obstructive sleep apnea, esophageal disease, body mass index, and vocal cord dysfunction. Supervised machine learning using five folds cross-validated neural additive network modelling (NAM) was performed on the phonations of aspirator versus non-aspirators. The model was then validated using an independent, external database. Results/Anticipated Results: Aspirators were found to have quantifiably worse quality of sound with higher jitter and shimmer but lower harmonics noise ratio. NAM modeling classified aspirators and non-aspirators as distinct groups (aspirator NAM risk score 0.528+0.2478 (mean + std) vs. non-aspirator (control) risk score of 0.252+0.241 (mean + std); p Discussion/Significance of Impact: We report the use of voice as a novel, noninvasive biomarker to detect aspiration risk using machine learning techniques. This tool has the potential to be used for the safe and early detection of aspiration in a variety of clinical settings including intensive care units, wards, outpatient clinics, and remote monitoring. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2059-8661 |