Assessment of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 Prediction Capability with Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test

The Power Burst Facility (PBF) was designed to provide experimental data to determine the thresholds for failure during accident conditions. Thus, the PBF benchmark using severe accidental analysis codes is essential to designing reactor for current directions. This assessment verified and validated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noppawan Rattanadecho, Somboon Rassame, Kampanart Silva, Chris Allison, Judith Hohorst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7456380
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559160915394560
author Noppawan Rattanadecho
Somboon Rassame
Kampanart Silva
Chris Allison
Judith Hohorst
author_facet Noppawan Rattanadecho
Somboon Rassame
Kampanart Silva
Chris Allison
Judith Hohorst
author_sort Noppawan Rattanadecho
collection DOAJ
description The Power Burst Facility (PBF) was designed to provide experimental data to determine the thresholds for failure during accident conditions. Thus, the PBF benchmark using severe accidental analysis codes is essential to designing reactor for current directions. This assessment verified and validated that the RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 code can be used to assess the Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test (SFD-ST) performed in the PBF facility. This study compares the cladding temperatures and hydrogen production results calculated by the RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 code with experimental data and calculated results from the SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.2 and SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.3 codes. The interested parameters are cladding temperature and hydrogen production since the cladding temperature affects hydrogen production and consequently influences the accident scenario. The calculated cladding temperatures and hydrogen production results from the RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 code are in a good agreement with the experimental data and are generally more reasonable than the calculated results from the SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.2 and SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.3 codes. There are some discrepancies in the cladding temperature and hydrogen production results but they are expected.
format Article
id doaj-art-a400b693d5804d02bccbb9b34014d5ef
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6075
1687-6083
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
spelling doaj-art-a400b693d5804d02bccbb9b34014d5ef2025-02-03T01:30:40ZengWileyScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations1687-60751687-60832017-01-01201710.1155/2017/74563807456380Assessment of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 Prediction Capability with Severe Fuel Damage Scoping TestNoppawan Rattanadecho0Somboon Rassame1Kampanart Silva2Chris Allison3Judith Hohorst4Department of Nuclear Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phayathai Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, ThailandDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, 254 Phayathai Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, ThailandThailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (Public Organization), 9/9 Moo 7, Saimoon, Ongkharak, Nakorn Nayok 26120, ThailandInnovation Systems Software, 2585 Briar Creek Ln., Ammon, Idaho 83406, USAInnovation Systems Software, 2585 Briar Creek Ln., Ammon, Idaho 83406, USAThe Power Burst Facility (PBF) was designed to provide experimental data to determine the thresholds for failure during accident conditions. Thus, the PBF benchmark using severe accidental analysis codes is essential to designing reactor for current directions. This assessment verified and validated that the RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 code can be used to assess the Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test (SFD-ST) performed in the PBF facility. This study compares the cladding temperatures and hydrogen production results calculated by the RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 code with experimental data and calculated results from the SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.2 and SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.3 codes. The interested parameters are cladding temperature and hydrogen production since the cladding temperature affects hydrogen production and consequently influences the accident scenario. The calculated cladding temperatures and hydrogen production results from the RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 code are in a good agreement with the experimental data and are generally more reasonable than the calculated results from the SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.2 and SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.3 codes. There are some discrepancies in the cladding temperature and hydrogen production results but they are expected.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7456380
spellingShingle Noppawan Rattanadecho
Somboon Rassame
Kampanart Silva
Chris Allison
Judith Hohorst
Assessment of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 Prediction Capability with Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
title Assessment of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 Prediction Capability with Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test
title_full Assessment of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 Prediction Capability with Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test
title_fullStr Assessment of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 Prediction Capability with Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 Prediction Capability with Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test
title_short Assessment of RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.4 Prediction Capability with Severe Fuel Damage Scoping Test
title_sort assessment of relap scdapsim mod3 4 prediction capability with severe fuel damage scoping test
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7456380
work_keys_str_mv AT noppawanrattanadecho assessmentofrelapscdapsimmod34predictioncapabilitywithseverefueldamagescopingtest
AT somboonrassame assessmentofrelapscdapsimmod34predictioncapabilitywithseverefueldamagescopingtest
AT kampanartsilva assessmentofrelapscdapsimmod34predictioncapabilitywithseverefueldamagescopingtest
AT chrisallison assessmentofrelapscdapsimmod34predictioncapabilitywithseverefueldamagescopingtest
AT judithhohorst assessmentofrelapscdapsimmod34predictioncapabilitywithseverefueldamagescopingtest