The basic reproduction number is a reliable indicator in infectious diseases, but has misleading meta-analysis
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Masoud Mohammadi |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Infection and Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187603412500156X |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
SARS-Cov-2 Incidence Monitoring and Statistical Estimation of the Basic and Time-Varying Reproduction Number at the Early Onset of the Pandemic in 45 Sub-Saharan African Countries.
by: Oduro, Michael Safo, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Methodology for Estimating the Basic Reproductive Number of Current Variants of the Virus SARS-CoV-2
by: A. N. Gerasimov, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
On the basic reproduction number $R_0$ in sexual activity models for HIV/AIDS epidemics: Example from Yunnan, China
by: Nicolas Bacaër, et al.
Published: (2007-07-01) -
Network-level reproduction number and extinction threshold for vector-borne diseases
by: Ling Xue, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Evaluating the impact of large-scale nucleic acid testing and home quarantine on a novel emerging infectious disease prevention and control: a dynamic modeling approach
by: Zuiyuan Guo, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)