Results of Observational Study and Integration of Epinastine 0,05% in Treatment Algorythms of Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis

Objective. To assess tolerability and the time of onset of clinical effect of dual­-action antihistamine agents — Epinepta® (epinastine 0.05 %) and olopatadine 0.1 % in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC).Subjects and methods. This was a prospective multicenter observational study....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Yu. Maychuk, E. A. Drozdova, A. A. Tarkhanova, E. E. Zinych
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ophthalmology Publishing Group 2024-06-01
Series:Oftalʹmologiâ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2377
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849774150828163072
author D. Yu. Maychuk
E. A. Drozdova
A. A. Tarkhanova
E. E. Zinych
author_facet D. Yu. Maychuk
E. A. Drozdova
A. A. Tarkhanova
E. E. Zinych
author_sort D. Yu. Maychuk
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To assess tolerability and the time of onset of clinical effect of dual­-action antihistamine agents — Epinepta® (epinastine 0.05 %) and olopatadine 0.1 % in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC).Subjects and methods. This was a prospective multicenter observational study. One hundred fifty patients with SAC (n = 150) were included into the study and divided into two groups (n = 75) in each. Patients in group 1 received epinastine 0.05 %, while patients into group 2 received olopatadine 0.1 %. Evaluation of clinical symptoms severity was performed using itching scale, hyperemia Efrone scale, eyelid swelling scale, lacrimation P. Munk scale, Shirmer test and Norn probe. Patients and healthcare providers satisfaction rate was assessed by Likert scale, patients self-­control diary that helped to assess dry eye severity symptoms. Treatment period lasted 14 days.Results. Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis treatment with epinastine 0.05 % or olopatadine 0.1 % was equally effective. However epinastine 0.05 % was causing dry eye symptoms in lesser degree than olopatadine 0.1 %. These results refer to all parameters assessed by patients’ self­-control diary — itching, discomfort, burning, eye blockage feeling.Conclusion. The study evaluated epinastine 0.05 % advantages compared to olopatadine 0.1 % in tear film preservation and causing less pronounced symptoms of dry eye in patients with acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Monotherapy of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis with epinastine 0.05 % demonstrated high efficacy and lead to SAC clinical manifestations regress. Epinastine 0.05 % is recommended as a first line treatment of SAC.
format Article
id doaj-art-a3bda52fa4e1457ea3d0c662ff314bc7
institution DOAJ
issn 1816-5095
2500-0845
language Russian
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Ophthalmology Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Oftalʹmologiâ
spelling doaj-art-a3bda52fa4e1457ea3d0c662ff314bc72025-08-20T03:01:50ZrusOphthalmology Publishing GroupOftalʹmologiâ1816-50952500-08452024-06-0121238639210.18008/1816-5095-2024-2-386-3921158Results of Observational Study and Integration of Epinastine 0,05% in Treatment Algorythms of Patients with Seasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisD. Yu. Maychuk0E. A. Drozdova1A. A. Tarkhanova2E. E. Zinych3The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionSouth Ural State Medical UniversityThe S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionThe S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State InstitutionObjective. To assess tolerability and the time of onset of clinical effect of dual­-action antihistamine agents — Epinepta® (epinastine 0.05 %) and olopatadine 0.1 % in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC).Subjects and methods. This was a prospective multicenter observational study. One hundred fifty patients with SAC (n = 150) were included into the study and divided into two groups (n = 75) in each. Patients in group 1 received epinastine 0.05 %, while patients into group 2 received olopatadine 0.1 %. Evaluation of clinical symptoms severity was performed using itching scale, hyperemia Efrone scale, eyelid swelling scale, lacrimation P. Munk scale, Shirmer test and Norn probe. Patients and healthcare providers satisfaction rate was assessed by Likert scale, patients self-­control diary that helped to assess dry eye severity symptoms. Treatment period lasted 14 days.Results. Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis treatment with epinastine 0.05 % or olopatadine 0.1 % was equally effective. However epinastine 0.05 % was causing dry eye symptoms in lesser degree than olopatadine 0.1 %. These results refer to all parameters assessed by patients’ self­-control diary — itching, discomfort, burning, eye blockage feeling.Conclusion. The study evaluated epinastine 0.05 % advantages compared to olopatadine 0.1 % in tear film preservation and causing less pronounced symptoms of dry eye in patients with acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Monotherapy of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis with epinastine 0.05 % demonstrated high efficacy and lead to SAC clinical manifestations regress. Epinastine 0.05 % is recommended as a first line treatment of SAC.https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2377seasonal allergic conjunctivitisepinastineepinepta®antihistamine dual­action agents
spellingShingle D. Yu. Maychuk
E. A. Drozdova
A. A. Tarkhanova
E. E. Zinych
Results of Observational Study and Integration of Epinastine 0,05% in Treatment Algorythms of Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
Oftalʹmologiâ
seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
epinastine
epinepta®
antihistamine dual­action agents
title Results of Observational Study and Integration of Epinastine 0,05% in Treatment Algorythms of Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_full Results of Observational Study and Integration of Epinastine 0,05% in Treatment Algorythms of Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_fullStr Results of Observational Study and Integration of Epinastine 0,05% in Treatment Algorythms of Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_full_unstemmed Results of Observational Study and Integration of Epinastine 0,05% in Treatment Algorythms of Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_short Results of Observational Study and Integration of Epinastine 0,05% in Treatment Algorythms of Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_sort results of observational study and integration of epinastine 0 05 in treatment algorythms of patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
topic seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
epinastine
epinepta®
antihistamine dual­action agents
url https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2377
work_keys_str_mv AT dyumaychuk resultsofobservationalstudyandintegrationofepinastine005intreatmentalgorythmsofpatientswithseasonalallergicconjunctivitis
AT eadrozdova resultsofobservationalstudyandintegrationofepinastine005intreatmentalgorythmsofpatientswithseasonalallergicconjunctivitis
AT aatarkhanova resultsofobservationalstudyandintegrationofepinastine005intreatmentalgorythmsofpatientswithseasonalallergicconjunctivitis
AT eezinych resultsofobservationalstudyandintegrationofepinastine005intreatmentalgorythmsofpatientswithseasonalallergicconjunctivitis