Intellectual property rights vs. public access rights: ethical aspects of the DeCSS decryptation program
<br><b>Introduction.</b> In 1999-2000, a Norwegian youth cracked a DVD-access code and published a decryptation program on the Internet. He was sued by the US DVD Copy Control Association (DVD-CCA) and the Norwegian Motion Picture Association (MAP), allies of the US Motion Picture...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Borås
2005-01-01
|
| Series: | Information Research: An International Electronic Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://informationr.net/ir/10-3/paper230.html |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | <br><b>Introduction.</b> In 1999-2000, a Norwegian youth cracked a DVD-access code and published a decryptation program on the Internet. He was sued by the US DVD Copy Control Association (DVD-CCA) and the Norwegian Motion Picture Association (MAP), allies of the US Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), arrested by Norwegian police and charged with data crime. Two Norwegian court rulings in 2003 unanimously ruled that the program did not amount to a breach of Norwegian law, and he was fully acquitted. In the US, there have been related cases, some with other outcomes. <br><b>Method.</b> Based on a theoretical framework developed by Zwass, the paper discusses these court rulings and the wider issues of intellectual property rights versus public access rights. <br><b>Analysis.</b> The DVD-Jon case illustrates that intellectual property rights can conflict with public access rights, as the struggle between proprietary software and public domain software, as well as the SPARC and Open Archives Initiative reflect. <br><b>Results.</b> An assessment of the DVD-Jon case based on the Zwass framework does not give a clear information ethics answer. The analysis depends on whether one ascribes to consequentialist (e.g., utilitarian) or de-ontological reflection, and also on which side of the digital gap is to be accorded most weight. <br><b>Conclusion.</b> While copyright interests are being legally strengthened, there may be ethically- grounded access rights that outweigh property rights. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1368-1613 |