A comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting
Assigning an economic value to cultural ecosystem services is important to promote their sustainable and rational use. Valuation of such services requires a non-market approach as they are not traded on markets and, thus, have no directly observable market price. The System of Environmental-Economic...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | One Ecosystem |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/108556/download/pdf/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832595273023488000 |
|---|---|
| author | Anna Bronzes Lars Hein Rolf Groeneveld Alim Pulatov |
| author_facet | Anna Bronzes Lars Hein Rolf Groeneveld Alim Pulatov |
| author_sort | Anna Bronzes |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Assigning an economic value to cultural ecosystem services is important to promote their sustainable and rational use. Valuation of such services requires a non-market approach as they are not traded on markets and, thus, have no directly observable market price. The System of Environmental-Economic Accounting – Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) aims to develop a systematic approach to value ecosystem services aligned with the valuation approach of the national accounts. However, valuing cultural services in SEEA-EA is challenging and different approaches have been developed. In this study, we compare four prominent approaches for valuing cultural ecosystem services: resource rent, travel cost method, simulated exchange value and consumer expenditure. We test and compare these methods in a case study of Ugam Chatkal State Nature National Park in Uzbekistan and examine to what degree the methods are aligned with accounting valuation principles. We note that the methods assess value in a different way and, accordingly, we find considerable differences amongst approaches in recreational value: values ranged between US$1.62M and US$65.19M annually. The lowest value was provided by the resource rent approach and the highest value by the travel cost method including consumer surplus. This latter method is not aligned with SEEA-EA accounting; however, even the three methods that are aligned with accounting principles provide quite different value estimates. The two other approaches, simulated exchange value and consumer expenditure, provided an annual value of US$24.46M and US$13.5M, respectively. We find that a resource rent method is likely to underestimate the 'true' value of the service when used for accounting and that the simulated exchange value method seems to be best aligned with the valuation needs for cultural services for SEEA-EA. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a3951ee53f7847d59ece868c20beb674 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2367-8194 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
| record_format | Article |
| series | One Ecosystem |
| spelling | doaj-art-a3951ee53f7847d59ece868c20beb6742025-01-19T08:30:19ZengPensoft PublishersOne Ecosystem2367-81942025-01-011013510.3897/oneeco.10.e108556108556A comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accountingAnna Bronzes0Lars Hein1Rolf Groeneveld2Alim Pulatov3Environmental Sciences, Open UniversiteitEarth Systems and Global Change, Wageningen UniversityEnvironmental Economics and Natural Resources, Wageningen UniversityEcoGIS Center, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization EngineersAssigning an economic value to cultural ecosystem services is important to promote their sustainable and rational use. Valuation of such services requires a non-market approach as they are not traded on markets and, thus, have no directly observable market price. The System of Environmental-Economic Accounting – Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) aims to develop a systematic approach to value ecosystem services aligned with the valuation approach of the national accounts. However, valuing cultural services in SEEA-EA is challenging and different approaches have been developed. In this study, we compare four prominent approaches for valuing cultural ecosystem services: resource rent, travel cost method, simulated exchange value and consumer expenditure. We test and compare these methods in a case study of Ugam Chatkal State Nature National Park in Uzbekistan and examine to what degree the methods are aligned with accounting valuation principles. We note that the methods assess value in a different way and, accordingly, we find considerable differences amongst approaches in recreational value: values ranged between US$1.62M and US$65.19M annually. The lowest value was provided by the resource rent approach and the highest value by the travel cost method including consumer surplus. This latter method is not aligned with SEEA-EA accounting; however, even the three methods that are aligned with accounting principles provide quite different value estimates. The two other approaches, simulated exchange value and consumer expenditure, provided an annual value of US$24.46M and US$13.5M, respectively. We find that a resource rent method is likely to underestimate the 'true' value of the service when used for accounting and that the simulated exchange value method seems to be best aligned with the valuation needs for cultural services for SEEA-EA.https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/108556/download/pdf/ecosystem accountingcultural ecosystem service |
| spellingShingle | Anna Bronzes Lars Hein Rolf Groeneveld Alim Pulatov A comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting One Ecosystem ecosystem accounting cultural ecosystem service |
| title | A comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting |
| title_full | A comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting |
| title_short | A comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting |
| title_sort | comparison of valuation methods for cultural ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting |
| topic | ecosystem accounting cultural ecosystem service |
| url | https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/108556/download/pdf/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annabronzes acomparisonofvaluationmethodsforculturalecosystemservicesinsupportofecosystemaccounting AT larshein acomparisonofvaluationmethodsforculturalecosystemservicesinsupportofecosystemaccounting AT rolfgroeneveld acomparisonofvaluationmethodsforculturalecosystemservicesinsupportofecosystemaccounting AT alimpulatov acomparisonofvaluationmethodsforculturalecosystemservicesinsupportofecosystemaccounting AT annabronzes comparisonofvaluationmethodsforculturalecosystemservicesinsupportofecosystemaccounting AT larshein comparisonofvaluationmethodsforculturalecosystemservicesinsupportofecosystemaccounting AT rolfgroeneveld comparisonofvaluationmethodsforculturalecosystemservicesinsupportofecosystemaccounting AT alimpulatov comparisonofvaluationmethodsforculturalecosystemservicesinsupportofecosystemaccounting |