On SU(3) Effective Models and Chiral Phase Transition
Sensitivity of Polyakov Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (PNJL) model and Polyakov linear sigma-model (PLSM) has been utilized in studying QCD phase-diagram. From quasi-particle model (QPM) a gluonic sector is integrated into LSM. The hadron resonance gas (HRG) model is used in calculating the thermal and dense d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Advances in High Energy Physics |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/563428 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832545530700365824 |
|---|---|
| author | Abdel Nasser Tawfik Niseem Magdy |
| author_facet | Abdel Nasser Tawfik Niseem Magdy |
| author_sort | Abdel Nasser Tawfik |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Sensitivity of Polyakov Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (PNJL) model and Polyakov linear sigma-model (PLSM) has been utilized in studying QCD phase-diagram. From quasi-particle model (QPM) a gluonic sector is integrated into LSM. The hadron resonance gas (HRG) model is used in calculating the thermal and dense dependence of quark-antiquark condensate. We review these four models with respect to their descriptions for the chiral phase transition. We analyze the chiral order parameter, normalized net-strange condensate, and chiral phase-diagram and compare the results with recent lattice calculations. We find that PLSM chiral boundary is located in upper band of the lattice QCD calculations and agree well with the freeze-out results deduced from various high-energy experiments and thermal models. Also, we find that the chiral temperature calculated from HRG is larger than that from PLSM. This is also larger than the freeze-out temperatures calculated in lattice QCD and deduced from experiments and thermal models. The corresponding temperature and chemical potential are very similar to that of PLSM. Although the results from PNJL and QLSM keep the same behavior, their chiral temperature is higher than that of PLSM and HRG. This might be interpreted due the very heavy quark masses implemented in both models. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a2ce214fa30248c0b3cbda8ab0c03312 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-7357 1687-7365 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in High Energy Physics |
| spelling | doaj-art-a2ce214fa30248c0b3cbda8ab0c033122025-02-03T07:25:33ZengWileyAdvances in High Energy Physics1687-73571687-73652015-01-01201510.1155/2015/563428563428On SU(3) Effective Models and Chiral Phase TransitionAbdel Nasser Tawfik0Niseem Magdy1Egyptian Center for Theoretical Physics (ECTP), Modern University for Technology and Information (MTI), Cairo 11571, EgyptWorld Laboratory for Cosmology And Particle Physics (WLCAPP), Cairo 11571, EgyptSensitivity of Polyakov Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (PNJL) model and Polyakov linear sigma-model (PLSM) has been utilized in studying QCD phase-diagram. From quasi-particle model (QPM) a gluonic sector is integrated into LSM. The hadron resonance gas (HRG) model is used in calculating the thermal and dense dependence of quark-antiquark condensate. We review these four models with respect to their descriptions for the chiral phase transition. We analyze the chiral order parameter, normalized net-strange condensate, and chiral phase-diagram and compare the results with recent lattice calculations. We find that PLSM chiral boundary is located in upper band of the lattice QCD calculations and agree well with the freeze-out results deduced from various high-energy experiments and thermal models. Also, we find that the chiral temperature calculated from HRG is larger than that from PLSM. This is also larger than the freeze-out temperatures calculated in lattice QCD and deduced from experiments and thermal models. The corresponding temperature and chemical potential are very similar to that of PLSM. Although the results from PNJL and QLSM keep the same behavior, their chiral temperature is higher than that of PLSM and HRG. This might be interpreted due the very heavy quark masses implemented in both models.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/563428 |
| spellingShingle | Abdel Nasser Tawfik Niseem Magdy On SU(3) Effective Models and Chiral Phase Transition Advances in High Energy Physics |
| title | On SU(3) Effective Models and Chiral Phase Transition |
| title_full | On SU(3) Effective Models and Chiral Phase Transition |
| title_fullStr | On SU(3) Effective Models and Chiral Phase Transition |
| title_full_unstemmed | On SU(3) Effective Models and Chiral Phase Transition |
| title_short | On SU(3) Effective Models and Chiral Phase Transition |
| title_sort | on su 3 effective models and chiral phase transition |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/563428 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelnassertawfik onsu3effectivemodelsandchiralphasetransition AT niseemmagdy onsu3effectivemodelsandchiralphasetransition |