Comparison of Conventional Polyethylene Wear and Signs of Cup Failure in Two Similar Total Hip Designs

Multiple factors have been identified as contributing to polyethylene wear and debris generation of the acetabular lining. Polyethylene wear is the primary limiting factor in the functional behavior and consequent longevity of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). This retrospective study reviewed the cli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas B. Pace, Kevin C. Keith, Estefania Alvarez, Rebecca G. Snider, Stephanie L. Tanner, John D. DesJardins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Advances in Orthopedics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/710621
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551692482117632
author Thomas B. Pace
Kevin C. Keith
Estefania Alvarez
Rebecca G. Snider
Stephanie L. Tanner
John D. DesJardins
author_facet Thomas B. Pace
Kevin C. Keith
Estefania Alvarez
Rebecca G. Snider
Stephanie L. Tanner
John D. DesJardins
author_sort Thomas B. Pace
collection DOAJ
description Multiple factors have been identified as contributing to polyethylene wear and debris generation of the acetabular lining. Polyethylene wear is the primary limiting factor in the functional behavior and consequent longevity of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). This retrospective study reviewed the clinical and radiographic data of 77 consecutive THAs comparing in vivo polyethylene wear of two similar acetabular cup liners. Minimum follow-up was 7 years (range 7–15). The incidence of measurable wear in a group of machined liners sterilized with ethylene oxide and composed of GUR 1050 stock resin was significantly higher (61%) than the compression-molded, GUR 1020, O2-free gamma irradiation sterilized group (24%) (P=0.0004). Clinically, at a 9-year average followup, both groups had comparable HHS scores and incidence of thigh or groin pain, though the machined group had an increased incidence of osteolysis and annual linear wear rate.
format Article
id doaj-art-a274db6704714c23be15b9235d29e573
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3464
2090-3472
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Orthopedics
spelling doaj-art-a274db6704714c23be15b9235d29e5732025-02-03T06:00:54ZengWileyAdvances in Orthopedics2090-34642090-34722013-01-01201310.1155/2013/710621710621Comparison of Conventional Polyethylene Wear and Signs of Cup Failure in Two Similar Total Hip DesignsThomas B. Pace0Kevin C. Keith1Estefania Alvarez2Rebecca G. Snider3Stephanie L. Tanner4John D. DesJardins5Department of Orthopaedics, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC 29605, USADepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USADepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC 29605, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC 29605, USADepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USAMultiple factors have been identified as contributing to polyethylene wear and debris generation of the acetabular lining. Polyethylene wear is the primary limiting factor in the functional behavior and consequent longevity of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). This retrospective study reviewed the clinical and radiographic data of 77 consecutive THAs comparing in vivo polyethylene wear of two similar acetabular cup liners. Minimum follow-up was 7 years (range 7–15). The incidence of measurable wear in a group of machined liners sterilized with ethylene oxide and composed of GUR 1050 stock resin was significantly higher (61%) than the compression-molded, GUR 1020, O2-free gamma irradiation sterilized group (24%) (P=0.0004). Clinically, at a 9-year average followup, both groups had comparable HHS scores and incidence of thigh or groin pain, though the machined group had an increased incidence of osteolysis and annual linear wear rate.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/710621
spellingShingle Thomas B. Pace
Kevin C. Keith
Estefania Alvarez
Rebecca G. Snider
Stephanie L. Tanner
John D. DesJardins
Comparison of Conventional Polyethylene Wear and Signs of Cup Failure in Two Similar Total Hip Designs
Advances in Orthopedics
title Comparison of Conventional Polyethylene Wear and Signs of Cup Failure in Two Similar Total Hip Designs
title_full Comparison of Conventional Polyethylene Wear and Signs of Cup Failure in Two Similar Total Hip Designs
title_fullStr Comparison of Conventional Polyethylene Wear and Signs of Cup Failure in Two Similar Total Hip Designs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Conventional Polyethylene Wear and Signs of Cup Failure in Two Similar Total Hip Designs
title_short Comparison of Conventional Polyethylene Wear and Signs of Cup Failure in Two Similar Total Hip Designs
title_sort comparison of conventional polyethylene wear and signs of cup failure in two similar total hip designs
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/710621
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasbpace comparisonofconventionalpolyethylenewearandsignsofcupfailureintwosimilartotalhipdesigns
AT kevinckeith comparisonofconventionalpolyethylenewearandsignsofcupfailureintwosimilartotalhipdesigns
AT estefaniaalvarez comparisonofconventionalpolyethylenewearandsignsofcupfailureintwosimilartotalhipdesigns
AT rebeccagsnider comparisonofconventionalpolyethylenewearandsignsofcupfailureintwosimilartotalhipdesigns
AT stephanieltanner comparisonofconventionalpolyethylenewearandsignsofcupfailureintwosimilartotalhipdesigns
AT johnddesjardins comparisonofconventionalpolyethylenewearandsignsofcupfailureintwosimilartotalhipdesigns