Who lies to protect another? Motivational, behavioral, and socio-cognitive predictors of children’s interventional deception

The objective of the current study was to examine how the expected rewards, theory of mind, and false praise-telling relate to interventional deception that prevents moral transgression. A sample of 114 children aged 4-7 years participated in the study. The expected rewards ratio was a statistically...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Płotnikowska Joanna, Filip Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2024-01-01
Series:Psychology of Language and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2024-0007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570274713698304
author Płotnikowska Joanna
Filip Anna
author_facet Płotnikowska Joanna
Filip Anna
author_sort Płotnikowska Joanna
collection DOAJ
description The objective of the current study was to examine how the expected rewards, theory of mind, and false praise-telling relate to interventional deception that prevents moral transgression. A sample of 114 children aged 4-7 years participated in the study. The expected rewards ratio was a statistically significant predictor of interventional deception, with the children being most likely to deceive to prevent moral transgressions when the deception involved high personal gain. Overall, children who gave false praise and who passed the hidden emotion task were more likely to deceive than those who told another individual an unpleasant truth and failed the emotion understanding task. The results are discussed with respect to diverse developmental conceptions and studies on prosocial behaviors and sociocognitive and cultural factors involved in deception.
format Article
id doaj-art-a267354fc9204dbda50cb8149a999d62
institution Kabale University
issn 2083-8506
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Psychology of Language and Communication
spelling doaj-art-a267354fc9204dbda50cb8149a999d622025-02-02T15:49:16ZengSciendoPsychology of Language and Communication2083-85062024-01-0128113916810.58734/plc-2024-0007Who lies to protect another? Motivational, behavioral, and socio-cognitive predictors of children’s interventional deceptionPłotnikowska Joanna0Filip Anna11Department of Cognitive and Comparative Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland3Institute of Psychology, Ignatianum University in Cracow, PolandThe objective of the current study was to examine how the expected rewards, theory of mind, and false praise-telling relate to interventional deception that prevents moral transgression. A sample of 114 children aged 4-7 years participated in the study. The expected rewards ratio was a statistically significant predictor of interventional deception, with the children being most likely to deceive to prevent moral transgressions when the deception involved high personal gain. Overall, children who gave false praise and who passed the hidden emotion task were more likely to deceive than those who told another individual an unpleasant truth and failed the emotion understanding task. The results are discussed with respect to diverse developmental conceptions and studies on prosocial behaviors and sociocognitive and cultural factors involved in deception.https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2024-0007deceptionprosocialinterventional deceptionchildrenfalse praiselie
spellingShingle Płotnikowska Joanna
Filip Anna
Who lies to protect another? Motivational, behavioral, and socio-cognitive predictors of children’s interventional deception
Psychology of Language and Communication
deception
prosocial
interventional deception
children
false praise
lie
title Who lies to protect another? Motivational, behavioral, and socio-cognitive predictors of children’s interventional deception
title_full Who lies to protect another? Motivational, behavioral, and socio-cognitive predictors of children’s interventional deception
title_fullStr Who lies to protect another? Motivational, behavioral, and socio-cognitive predictors of children’s interventional deception
title_full_unstemmed Who lies to protect another? Motivational, behavioral, and socio-cognitive predictors of children’s interventional deception
title_short Who lies to protect another? Motivational, behavioral, and socio-cognitive predictors of children’s interventional deception
title_sort who lies to protect another motivational behavioral and socio cognitive predictors of children s interventional deception
topic deception
prosocial
interventional deception
children
false praise
lie
url https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2024-0007
work_keys_str_mv AT płotnikowskajoanna wholiestoprotectanothermotivationalbehavioralandsociocognitivepredictorsofchildrensinterventionaldeception
AT filipanna wholiestoprotectanothermotivationalbehavioralandsociocognitivepredictorsofchildrensinterventionaldeception