Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines

BACKGROUND: In 2022, the WHO announced that the 6-month BPaL/M regimen should be used for drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). We estimate the patient and provider costs of BPaL compared to current standard-of-care treatment in the Philippines.METHODS: Patients on BPaL under operational research, or 9–11-mont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Evans, K. Hirasen, D.J. Casalme, M.T. Gler, A. Gupta, S. Juneja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union) 2024-06-01
Series:IJTLD Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/iuatld/ijtldo/2024/00000001/00000006/art00002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592300826427392
author D. Evans
K. Hirasen
D.J. Casalme
M.T. Gler
A. Gupta
S. Juneja
author_facet D. Evans
K. Hirasen
D.J. Casalme
M.T. Gler
A. Gupta
S. Juneja
author_sort D. Evans
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: In 2022, the WHO announced that the 6-month BPaL/M regimen should be used for drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). We estimate the patient and provider costs of BPaL compared to current standard-of-care treatment in the Philippines.METHODS: Patients on BPaL under operational research, or 9–11-month standard short oral regimen (SSOR) and 18–21-month standard long oral regimen (SLOR) under programmatic conditions were interviewed using the WHO cross-sectional TB patient cost tool. Provider costs were assessed through a bottom-up and top-down costing analysis.RESULTS: Total patient costs per treatment episode were lowest with BPaL (USD518.0) and increased with use of SSOR (USD825.8) and SLOR (USD1,023.0). Total provider costs per successful treatment were lowest with BPaL (USD1,994.5) and increased with SSOR (USD3,121.5) and SLOR (USD10,032.4). Compared to SSOR, BPaL treatment was cost-effective at even the lowest willingness to pay threshold. As expected, SLOR was the costliest and least effective regimen.CONCLUSIONS: Costs incurred by patients on BPaL were 37% (95% CI 22–56) less than SSOR and 50% (95% CI 32–68) less than SLOR, while providers could save 36% (95% CI 21–56) to 80% (95% CI 64–93) per successful treatment, respectively. The study shows that treatment of DR-TB with BPaL was cost-saving for patients and cost-effective for the health system.
format Article
id doaj-art-a1b662e6baa34942b03c3609f5500c7c
institution Kabale University
issn 3005-7590
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union)
record_format Article
series IJTLD Open
spelling doaj-art-a1b662e6baa34942b03c3609f5500c7c2025-01-21T10:44:17ZengInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union)IJTLD Open3005-75902024-06-011624224910.5588/ijtldopen.24.00942Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the PhilippinesD. Evans0K. Hirasen1D.J. Casalme2M.T. Gler3A. Gupta4S. Juneja5Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg,Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg,TB-HIV Innovations and Research Foundation,TB-HIV Innovations and Research Foundation,TB Alliance, New York, NY, USATB Alliance, New York, NY, USABACKGROUND: In 2022, the WHO announced that the 6-month BPaL/M regimen should be used for drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). We estimate the patient and provider costs of BPaL compared to current standard-of-care treatment in the Philippines.METHODS: Patients on BPaL under operational research, or 9–11-month standard short oral regimen (SSOR) and 18–21-month standard long oral regimen (SLOR) under programmatic conditions were interviewed using the WHO cross-sectional TB patient cost tool. Provider costs were assessed through a bottom-up and top-down costing analysis.RESULTS: Total patient costs per treatment episode were lowest with BPaL (USD518.0) and increased with use of SSOR (USD825.8) and SLOR (USD1,023.0). Total provider costs per successful treatment were lowest with BPaL (USD1,994.5) and increased with SSOR (USD3,121.5) and SLOR (USD10,032.4). Compared to SSOR, BPaL treatment was cost-effective at even the lowest willingness to pay threshold. As expected, SLOR was the costliest and least effective regimen.CONCLUSIONS: Costs incurred by patients on BPaL were 37% (95% CI 22–56) less than SSOR and 50% (95% CI 32–68) less than SLOR, while providers could save 36% (95% CI 21–56) to 80% (95% CI 64–93) per successful treatment, respectively. The study shows that treatment of DR-TB with BPaL was cost-saving for patients and cost-effective for the health system.https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/iuatld/ijtldo/2024/00000001/00000006/art00002bedaquilinepretomanidlinezolideconomic evaluationcost analysis
spellingShingle D. Evans
K. Hirasen
D.J. Casalme
M.T. Gler
A. Gupta
S. Juneja
Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines
IJTLD Open
bedaquiline
pretomanid
linezolid
economic evaluation
cost analysis
title Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines
title_full Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines
title_fullStr Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines
title_full_unstemmed Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines
title_short Cost and cost-effectiveness of BPaL regimen used in drug-resistant TB treatment in the Philippines
title_sort cost and cost effectiveness of bpal regimen used in drug resistant tb treatment in the philippines
topic bedaquiline
pretomanid
linezolid
economic evaluation
cost analysis
url https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/iuatld/ijtldo/2024/00000001/00000006/art00002
work_keys_str_mv AT devans costandcosteffectivenessofbpalregimenusedindrugresistanttbtreatmentinthephilippines
AT khirasen costandcosteffectivenessofbpalregimenusedindrugresistanttbtreatmentinthephilippines
AT djcasalme costandcosteffectivenessofbpalregimenusedindrugresistanttbtreatmentinthephilippines
AT mtgler costandcosteffectivenessofbpalregimenusedindrugresistanttbtreatmentinthephilippines
AT agupta costandcosteffectivenessofbpalregimenusedindrugresistanttbtreatmentinthephilippines
AT sjuneja costandcosteffectivenessofbpalregimenusedindrugresistanttbtreatmentinthephilippines